臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：我國高速公路電子收費系統政策變遷之分析：整合型分析模式
書刊名：政治科學論叢
作者：陳恒鈞
作者(外文)：Chen, Hen-chin
出版日期：2009
卷期：39
頁次：頁1-53
主題關鍵詞：政策變遷；高速公路電子收費系統；整合型分析模式；非漸進調適方式；Policy change；Electronic toll collection system；Integrative analysis model；Non-incremental adjustment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:30
Once a policy has been made, it becomes prey to all sorts of political realities and social dynamics that constantly affect and shape how the policy is viewed as time passes. Such real-world dynamics often force policy to change. While the Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) system is basically a sound policy, there has been an extremely big gap between final results and initial expectations. This paper tries to analyze why changes in the form of ETC are not incremental and directional, but rapid, dramatic and non-incremental. In addition, it seeks to probe factors which can account for such changes, and examine the relationship between these factors. To address these issues, this paper first of all examines different models of policy change, and thenpresents an integrative model, composed of time, policy ideas, the decision-making of key individuals and the manner of institutional operation. Secondly, the policy-making process of ETC is divided into five stages in order to understand key factors in policy changes. Thirdly, these factors are divided into four categories, in accordance with the variables of the integrative model. Based on these factors, this paper adopts a method of semi-structured interview. Fourthly, it attempts to analyze the results of interviews by using the software NUD∗IST Vivo. Lastly, combining theories into a short discussion, this paper offers some genreal conclusions. This paper finds that not all policy changes are incremental. In fact, if we regard policy as a temporal state, then policy change probably reflects the mainstream politics of the period and wider public opinion. In addition, we find that the variables of an integrative model are suitable for explaining changes in ETC policy. In short (1) the interactions between policy ideas and images are the main factors behind change; (2) the decisions from key individuals as also an important factor in change; (3) the interactions between policy ideas and the decisions of key individuals affects OBU users. Conversely, non-users are affected by the interactions between the decisions of key individuals and the manner of institutional operation; (4) institutions act as instruments of policy change.
期刊論文
1.劉宜君、陳敦源、蕭乃沂、林昭吟(20050600)。網絡分析在利害關係人概念之應用--以我國全民健保政策改革為例。臺灣社會福利學刊，4(1)，95-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sebenius, J. K.(1992)。Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities。International Organization，46(1)，323-366。  new window
3.John, Peter(2003)。Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change?。Policy Studies Journal，31(4)，481-498。  new window
4.Van Waarden, Frans(2002)。Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks。European Journal of Political Research，21(1)，29-52。  new window
5.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1996)。Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions。Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions，9(3)，247-264。  new window
6.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1984)。The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life。American Political Science Review，78(3)，734-749。  new window
7.Lindblom, Charles Edward(1959)。The Science of "Muddling Through"。Public Administration Review，19(2)，79-88。  new window
8.李心怡(2006)。立院共犯結構「利」委介入害慘ETC。新台灣新聞週刊。  延伸查詢new window
9.李靜(2002)。微波、紅外線系統業者惡鬥，ETC 建置再延。新台灣新聞週刊。  延伸查詢new window
10.Baumgartner, F. R.、B. D. Jones.(1991)。“Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems.”。Journal of Politics，53，1044-1074。  new window
11.Dudley, G.(1999)。“Transplanting Ideas in Policy Networks: Reinventing Local Government and the Case of Steel Action.”。Local Government Studies，25(3)，76-89。  new window
12.Hall, P.(1993)。“Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy-making in Britain.”。Comparative Politics，44(5)，936-957。  new window
13.Hilgartner, S.、C. L. Bosk.(1988)。“The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Areas Model.”。American Journal of Sociology，84(1)，53-78。  new window
14.Jacobson, J. K.(1995)。“Much ado about Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy.”。World Politics，47，283-310。  new window
15.Sabatier, P. A.(1998)。“An Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance to Europe.”。Journal of European Public Policy，5(1)，98-130。  new window
16.Starkie, D.(1984)。“Policy Changes, Configurations and Catatroples.”。Policy and Politics，12(1)，71-74。  new window
會議論文
1.Hay, C.(1998)。Political time and temporality of crisis on institutional change as punctuated evaluation。  new window
圖書
1.Hogwood, W. Brian、B. Guy Peters.(1983)。Policy Dynamics。NY：St.Martin’s Press。  new window
2.Peters, B. Guy(1986)。American Public Policy: Promise and Performance。Chatham, NJ：Chatham House。  new window
3.de Nooy, Wouter、Mrvar, Andrej、Batagelj, Vladimir(2005)。Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Reich, R. B.(1988)。The Power of Public Ideas。Cambridge, Mass：Havard University Press。  new window
5.Edelman, Murray(1971)。Politics as Symbolic Action。Chicago, IL：Markham。  new window
6.Lester, J. P.、Stewart, J. Jr.(2000)。Public policy: An evolutionary approach。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth。  new window
7.Dunleavy, P.(1991)。Democracy, Bureaucracy, and Public Choice。London：Harvester Wheatsheaf。  new window
8.Truman, D.(1962)。The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion。New York：Knopf。  new window
9.John, Peter(1998)。Analysing Public Policy。New York, NY：Continuum International Publishing。  new window
10.Zahariadis, Nikolaos(2003)。Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies。Washington, DC：Georgetown University Press。  new window
11.Schattschneider, Elmer Eric(1960)。The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America。Holt, Rinehart, and Winston。  new window
12.Baumgartne, F. R.、Jones, B. D.(1993)。Agendas and Instability in American Politics。Chicago, IL：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.吳定(2006)。公共政策辭典。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.Hayes, Michael T.(1992)。Incrementalism and Public Policy。New York：Longman。  new window
15.Kingdon, John W.(1995)。Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies。Longman。  new window
16.Patton, C. V.、Sawicki, D. S.(1993)。Basic methods of policy analysis and planning。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
17.Babbie, Earl R.、陳文俊(2005)。社會科學研究方法。臺北：雙葉書廊有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.周育仁、鄭又平(1998)。政治經濟學。台北：空中大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Easton, David、Dennis, J.(1965)。A framework for political analysis。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
20.Wilson, James Q.(1989)。Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do it?。Basic Books。  new window
21.Dye, Thomas R.(1995)。Understanding Public Policy。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall。  new window
22.Lindblom, Charles Edward(1977)。Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems。New York, NY：Basic Books。  new window
23.林水波、張世賢(2006)。公共政策。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
24.Stone, Deborah A.(1997)。Policy paradox: The art of political decision making。New York：W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
25.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
26.Dudley G.、J. Richardson.(2000)。Why dose Policy Change? Lessons from British Transport Policy 1945-1999。London and New York。  new window
27.Kay, A.(2006)。The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory and Evidence。Cheltenham, UK：Edward Elgar。  new window
28.Marsh, D.、R. A. W. Rhodes.(1992)。Policy Networks in Britsh Government。Oxford。  new window
29.Sabatier, P. A.、H. C. Jenkins-Smith.(1993)。“The Study of Policy Process.”。Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach。Boulder, CO。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳敦源(1999)。民意與公共政策。公共管理。台北：商鼎文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Peters, B. G.(1996)。Political Institutions, Old and New。A New Handbook of Political Science。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：588（臺灣：568，外國：20） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67265651
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上