超越相互依賴和對抗？韓國政府財閥政策變遷的研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	超越相互依賴和對抗？韓國政府財閥政策變遷的研究
書刊名：	問題與研究
作者：	林文斌
作者(外文)：	Lin, Wen-pin
出版日期：	2010
卷期：	49:4
頁次：	頁65-105
主題關鍵詞：	韓國經濟；政府；財閥；金融改革；公司治理；Korea economy；Government；Chaebol；Financial reform；Corporate governance
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(2) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:23 點閱:92

韓國財閥如現代、三星、LG，目前已是全球知名企業。他們的崛起與韓國政府的強烈支持有重大關係：政府支持財閥，分擔其投資分險、給予寡、獨占市場控制；財閥則回報政府以提供就業機會、賺取外匯、促進經濟成長。然而在此光明表象下，韓國政府與財閥間也有為人詬病的陰暗關係：政府官員收受財閥政治獻金及其他種種「政治規費」，財閥則被回報以財經措施上的優惠。而隨著政治民主化，政府遭受國民逐漸上升的監督，要求政府和財閥的透明關係，並控制富可敵國的財閥。然而財閥則因經濟自由化而日益壯大，不再受制於政府的管控。韓國政府的財閥政策因此面臨兩難：壓制財閥恐提高財閥成本，不利經濟；放縱財閥則又招來國民批評。即使1980年代以來歴任總統都採取所謂的財閥政策，以及金融危機後的產業重組、防止經濟集中、財務改革與透明化、公司治理改革等四大面向的財閥政策，以降低韓國財閥的經濟集中度。但本文分析結果認為，四大面向的改革並未達成目標，政府與財閥關係仍然相互依賴。不過，政府對財閥的公司治理改革，給予社會團體以小股東的身分監督財閥，或許可能在政府與財閥間設下一道防火牆。

以文找文

Korean conglomerates, or chaebols in Korean, such as Samsung, Hyundai, LG, are now familiar and global enterprises. However, the rising of chaebols was supported and often pushed by Korean government. For instance, government and chaebols shared investment risks and their aims to keep national market oligarchic or monopolistic, etc. Chaebols returned by creating employment opportunities, earning foreign exchanges, and driving economic development. But underneith the shining surface lies a dark and notorious side: for economic, financial, and tax welfare, chaebols often bribed government officials with huge sum of illegal money, and officials sometimes also charged chaebols “political fees”. As to Korean democratic development, government was asked to be more accountable to the people, and relations between government and chaebols also are to be more open and transparent, and to even restrain the huge and wealthy chaebols. However, chaebols through economic development and liberalization has become difficult to control, Korean government therefore faced a dilemma: either regulate chaebols with risk of economic downturn due to chaebols’ cost-up or continue with laissez-faire with increasing discontent from people. After serial government’s chaebol policy since the 1980s and post-financial crisis, political and economic reforms were focused on four aspects: industrial restructuring, prevention of wealth concentration, reforms of financial transparency, and corporate governance reforms for decreasing the economic power and concentration of chaebols. However, this article argues that the main goal of the chaebol policy was not attainted; the government-chaebol relations are still a form of mutual dependence and confrontation. Yet the rising of small shareholder's power in corporate governance reforms may empower social groups to build a firewall between government and chaebols.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Khatri, Naresh、Tsang, Eric W. K.、Begley, Thomas M.(2006)。Cronyism: A Cross-Cultural Analysis。Journal of International Business Studies，37(1)，61-75。
2.	Chang, H. J.、Park, H. J.、Yoo, C. G.(1998)。Interpreting the Korean crisis: financial liberalization, industrial policy and corporate governance。Cambridge Journal of Economics，22，753-746。
3.	Moon, Myung-Jae、Ingraham, Patricia(1998)。Shaping administrative reform and governance: An examination of the political nexus triads in three Asian countries。Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration，11(1)，77-100。
4.	Moon, Chung-in(1988)。The Demise of a Developmentalist State? The Politics of Stabilization and Structural Adjustment。Journal of Developing Societies，4，67-84。
5.	Lee, Chung H.(1992)。The Government, Financial System, and Large Private Enterprises in the Economic Development of South Korea。World Development，20(2)，187-197。
6.	Chang, Ha-Joon(1998)。Korea: the misunderstood crisis。World Development，26(8)，1555-1561。
7.	Haggard, Stephan、Mo, Jongryn(2000)。The Political Economy of the Korean Financial Crisis。Review of International Political Economy，7(2)，197-218。
8.	Laffont, J. J.、Tirole, J.(1991)。The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture。The Ouarterly Journal of Economics，106(4)，1089-1127。
9.	Wade, Robert、Veneroso, Frank(1998)。The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model Versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex。New Left Review，228，3-22。
10.	Stigler, George J.(1971)。The Theory of Economic Regulation。The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science，2(1)，1-21。
11.	Choi, Jongmoo Jay、Park, Sae Woon、Yoo, Sean Sehyun(2007)。The value of outside directors: evidence from corporate governance reform in Korea。Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis，42(4)，941-962。
12.	Krueger, Anne O.(1974)。The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society。American Economic Review，64(3)，291-303。
13.	朴一(2000)。韓国経済の危機と構造改革の葛藤：経危機を前後する政府•企業間關係の変化と連続性。社会科学研究，51(1)，頁67-90。延伸查詢
14.	高龍秀(2001)。韓国における財閥改革とコーボレート•ガバナンス。社会科学研究 (東京大学)，52(5)，頁125-147。延伸查詢
15.	高龍秀(2004)。韓国ファミリービジンネスの淘汰生きと殘りーSK グルーブを中心に。甲南経済学論集，45(2)，頁31-58。延伸查詢
16.	Amsden Alice H. and Yoon-Dae Euh(1980)。South Korea’s 1980s Financial Reforms: Good bye Financial Repression （ Maybe ）, Hello New Institutional Restraints,”。World Development，vol. 21 No. 3，pp. 379~390。
17.	Business Korea, “(1999)。Chaebols Move to Expand Empires,”。Business Korea,，p. 43.。
18.	Business Korea,(2001)。“Conglomerates Dominate Non-banking Sector,”。Business Korea,，August，p. 19。
19.	Business Korea,(2001)。“New Big Deal: Major Industries Need Downsizing,”。Business Korea，Feb，pp. 30~34。
20.	Bussiness Korea,(2005)。“The Samsung Empire,”。Business Korea，Oct.，14。
21.	Bussiness Korea,(2005)。“Untangling the X-File: A Media-driven War called the X-file Scandal,”。Business Korea，Sep.，10。
22.	Ha, Yong-Chool and Wang Hwi Lee,(2007)。The Politics of Economic Refrom in South Korea,”。Asian Survey,，Vol. 47, No. 6，pp. 894~914。
23.	Kim, Eun Mee,(1988)。From Doninance to Symbiosis: State and Chaebol in Korea,”。Pacific Focus，Vol. 3, No. 2，pp. 105~121。
24.	Kwon, O. Yul,(2006)。Recent Changes in Korea’s Business Environment: Views of Foreign Business People in Korea,”。Asia Pacific Business Review,，Vol. 12, No. 1，pp. 77~94。
25.	Schopf, James C.,(2001)。An Explanation for the End of Political Bank Robbery in the Republic of Korea。Asian Survey，Vol. 41, No. 5，pp. 693~715。
26.	Soh, Changrok,(2004)。Heavy and Chemical Industrialization（HCI）Policy as a Mega-policy。The Korean Journal of Policy Studies,，Vol. 8, No. 2，pp. 13~29。
27.	Tae, Yun(1999)。Neoliberailsm and the decline of the developmental state。Journal of Contemporary Asia,，Vol. 29, No. 4，pp. 441~452。
28.	Thurbon, Elizabeth(2001)。Two Paths to Financial Liberalization: South Korea and Taiwan。The Pacific Review，14(2)，241-267。

研究報告
1.	飯島高雄(2004)。韓国「構造改革」の理論分析：韓国の構造改革が示唆するもの。東京。延伸查詢
2.	경제개혁연대經濟改革團結聯盟、사외이사의 실질적인 독립성 분석外部獨立董事之實質獨立性分析서울首爾：경제개혁연대經濟改革團結聯盟(2008)。사외이사의 실질적인 독립성 분석（外部獨立董事之實質獨立性分析）（。서울（首爾）：。延伸查詢
3.	경제개혁연대經濟改革團結聯盟(2000)。2008 재벌의 경제력 집중과：업종 다각화현황 분석(財閥經濟力集中暨經營多角化之現況分析）。서울（首爾。延伸查詢
4.	공정거래위원회（韓國公平交易委員會）(2007)。200 년 대규모기업집단：소유지분구조에대한 정보공개（2007 年大規模企業集團：所有權結構公開資訊)。서울（首爾）：。延伸查詢
5.	공정거래위원회（韓國公平交易委員會）(2009)。공정위，자산 5 조원 이상 48 개 상호출자제한기업집단 지정（公平會指定之超過五兆韓圜的48個限制相互出資企業集團）。서울（首爾）：。延伸查詢
6.	Abe Makoto Yukihito Sato and Mamoru Nagano(1999)。Economic Crisis and Korea/Taiwan。Tokyo。
7.	Cho, Yoon Je and Joon Kyung Kim, Credit Policies and the Industrialization of Korea, KDIResearch Monograph(199)。Credit Policies and the Industrialization of Korea,。Seoul。
8.	Financial Supervisory Service,(2004)。Financial Supervisory System in Korea 2003。Seoul。
9.	OECD,(2004)。Economic Survey of Korea, 2004。Paris。
10.	Yoo, Seong Min and Youngjae Lim(199)。Big Business in Korea: New Learning and PolicyIssues。
11.	Yoo, Seong Min(1999)。Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Policy Issues Befroe and During theCrisis。

學位論文
1.	Jang, Guhn-Choon(2000)。The Political Economy of Privatization: The Policy Enviornment of Privatization for State-Owned Banks in Korea。

圖書
1.	Haggard, Stephan、Maxfield, Sylvia、Schneider, Ben R.(1997)。Theories of Business and Business-State Relations。Business and the State in Developing Countries。Ithaca, NY：Cornell University Press。
2.	Haggard, Stephen(1990)。Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrialized Countries。Ithaca。
3.	Shin, Jang-Sup and Ha-Joon Chang,(2003)。Restructuring Korea Inc.。London：Routledge Curzon。
4.	Kirk, Donald(1994)。Korean Dynasty: Hyundai and Chung Ju Yung。Armonk, NY：M. E. Sharpe。
5.	Zhang, Xiaoke(2003)。The Changing Politics of Finance in Korea and Thailand: From Deregulation to Debacle。Routledge。
6.	Tiberghien, Yves(2007)。Entrepreneurial States: Reforming Corporate Government in France, Japan, and Korea。Ithaca：Cornell University Press。
7.	Kang, David C.(2002)。Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines。Cambridge University Press。
8.	Kim, Eun-Mee(1997)。Big Business, Strong State: Collusion and Conflict in South Korean Development, 1960-1990。New York：State University of New York Press。
9.	Woo, Jung-en(1991)。Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization。New York：Columbia University Press。
10.	Cardoso, Fernando Henrique、Faletto, Enzo、Urquidi, Marjory Mattingly(1979)。Dependency and Development in Latin America。University of California Press。
11.	Weiss, Linda(1998)。The Myth of The Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era。Polity Press。
12.	Evans, Peter B.(1979)。Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil。Princeton University Press。
13.	Haggard, Stephan、Mo, Jongryn(2000)。The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis。Washington, DC：Institute for International Economics。
14.	Evans, Peter B.(1995)。Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。
15.	Amsden, Alice Hoffenberg(1989)。Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization。Oxford University Press。
16.	蔡增家(20050000)。南韓轉型 : 政黨輪替與政經體制的轉變(1993-2003)。臺北：巨流。延伸查詢
17.	Johnson, Chalmers(1982)。MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975。Stanford University Press。
18.	Wade, Robert(1990)。Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialiation。Princeton University Press。
19.	大西裕(2005)。韓国経済の政治分析：大統領の政策選択。東京。延伸查詢
20.	内橋賢悟(2009)。50‐60 年代の韓国金融改革と財閥形成：「制度移植」の思わざる結果。東京。延伸查詢
21.	玉置直司(2003)。韓国はなぜ改革できたのか。東京。延伸查詢
22.	池東旭(2002)。韓国財閥の興亡：癒着と相克のドラマ。東京。延伸查詢
23.	佐桑徹(2001)。韓国財閥解体。東京。延伸查詢
24.	高安雄一(2005)。韓国の構造改革。東京。延伸查詢
25.	高龍秀(2000)。韓国の経済システム：囯際資本移動の拡大と構造改革の進展。東京。延伸查詢
26.	高龍秀(2009)。韓国の企業•金融改革。東京。延伸查詢
27.	趙淳(2005)。韓国経済発展のダイナミズム。東京。延伸查詢
28.	鄭章淵(2009)。韓国財閥史の研究：分断体制資本主義と韓国財閥。東京。延伸查詢
29.	Bridges, Brian,(2001)。rea after the Crash: The Politics of Economic Recovery。London:。
30.	Chang, Sea-Jin(200)。Financial Crisis and Transformation of Korean Business Groups: The Riseand Fall of Chaeb。Cambridge。
31.	Cole, David C. and Yung Chul Park, Financial Development in Korea,(1983)。Financial Development in Korea。Cambridge, Massachusetts。
32.	Cumings Bruce Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern HistoryNew York: W. W. Norton、Company(1997)。Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History。New York:。
33.	Evans, Peter, ,(1997)。State Structures, Government-Business Relations, and Economic Transformation。Business and the State in Developing Countries。Ithaca。
34.	Hwang, Inhak and Jung-Hwan Seo,(2004)。Corporate Governance and Chaebol Reform in Korea,”。Competition and Corporate Governance in Korea: Reforming and Restructuring the Chaebol。Cheltenham, UK。
35.	Jon Sung Wook(2001)。The Korea Corporate Sector: Crisis and Reform。Korea’s Economic Prospects: From Financial Crisis to Prosperity。Cheltenham UK:。
36.	Jwa Sung Hee and Insill Yi(2001)。The Korean Financial Crisis: Evaluation and Lessons。Korea’s Economic Prospects: From Financial Crisis to Prosperity。Cheltenham UK:。
37.	Jwa Sung Hee(2004)。The Chaebol Corporate Policy and Korea’s Development Paradigm。Competition and Corporate Governance in Korea。Cheltenham UK:。
38.	Jwa Sung Hee(2001)。A New Paradigm for Korea’s Economic Development。Hampshire UK:。
39.	Kang C. S. Eliot(2003)。The Developmental State and Democratic Consolidation in South Korea。Korea’s Democratization。New York:。
40.	Kim, Byung-Kook,(2003)。The Politics of Chaebol Reform, 1980-1997。Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol。New York。
41.	Lee, Yeon-ho and Hyuk-Rae Kim,(2000)。The Dilemma of Market Liberalization。Politics and Markets in the Wake of the Asian Crisis。London:。
42.	Lew, Seok-Jin,(1999)。Democratization and Government Intervention in the Economy: Insights onthe Decision-Making Process form the Automobile Industrial Policies。Democracy and the Korean Economy。Stanford:。
43.	Lim, Wonhyuk,(2003)。The Emergence of the Chaebol and the Origins of the Chaebol Problem。Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol。New York:。
44.	Mo, Jongryn and Chung-In Moon,(2003)。Business and Government under Kim Dae-jung。Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol。New York:。
45.	Moon, Chung-In,(1994)。Changing Patterns of Business-Governement Relations in South Korea。Business and Governement in Industrializing Asia。Ithaca。
46.	Schneider, Ben Ross and Syliva Maxfield, “(1997)。Business and the State in Developing Countries。Business, the State, and Economic Performance in Developing Countries。Ithaca。
47.	Shin, Kwanghik,(2003)。Competition Law and Policy。Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reformingthe Chaebol。New York。
48.	Woo-Cumings, Meredith,(2001)。Miracle as Prologue: The State and the Reform of The Corporate Sector in Korea。Rethinking the East Asian Miracle。New York。
49.	Sakong, Il,(1993)。Korea in the World Economy。Washington, D.C.:,。
50.	Kim, Eun Mee,(1994)。Big Business, Strong State: Collusion and Conflict。Albany, NY:。

圖書論文
1.	Johnson, Chalmers(1987)。Political Institutions and Economic Performamce: The Government--Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan。The Political Economy of New Asian Industrialism。London：Cornell University Press。
2.	Nam, S. W.(1996)。The Principal Transactions Bank System in Korea and a Search for a New Bank-Business Relationship。Financial Degregulation and Integration in East Asia。Chicago：Lodon：The University of Chicago pressed。
3.	安倍誠(2005)。韓国における財閥問題：現状・諸議論・政策対応。経済危機後の韓国：成熟期，に向けての経済・社会的課題。東京：日本貿易振興機構アジア経済研究所。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	臺灣與韓國大型造船產業之比較政治經濟分析(1970~2001年)：從發展型國家到資本主義多樣性的觀點
2.	南韓與臺灣憲政體制之比較--「形異實同」的憲政體制
3.	韓國產業銀行民營化轉型案例分析
4.	民主化後臺灣與韓國檢察獨立的差異：權力結構與競爭度變化的解釋
5.	南韓「總統制」下總統與國會的對抗僵局
6.	地域權力的空間化：以南韓區域發展為例
7.	韓國民主化與國家認同--美國、核武、與統一
8.	立法從嚴、執法更嚴：韓國政治資金與選舉經費管理
9.	政府契約用人制度變革之研析
10.	內部民族主義與外部全球化：南韓財閥經濟發展的政治經濟分析(1961-2004)
11.	南韓民主化過程之簡析--以Huntington民主化理論為分析觀點
12.	政府改造與彈性用人政策
13.	論我國政務人員法制之建構與運作

1.	東亞民眾的制度不信任感及其政治回應行為
2.	當代轉型正義的制度與規範脈絡－兼論南韓與台灣的經驗比較
3.	政黨體系與民主鞏固：台灣與南韓的比較分析
4.	製造創意：韓國文化內容產業政策的起源與發展
5.	誰否決？新興市場金融自由化改革的政治分析：智利、南韓與巴西經驗的比較
6.	台韓轉型--經濟發展策略的政經途徑分析(1987-2004)
7.	日本、韓國、台灣金融體制改革的比較政治經濟分析

1.	從困境中奮起：另眼看1945年後的東亞史
2.	當代轉型正義的制度與規範脈絡：兼論南韓與臺灣的經驗比較
3.	東亞金融政治 : 日韓臺金融體制的形成、發展與轉變
4.	韓國義務教育之探究
5.	南韓轉型 : 政黨輪替與政經體制的轉變(1993-2003)
6.	臺韓中小企業邁向隱形冠軍之研究
7.	韓國民主化與國家認同--美國、核武、與統一
8.	韓國經濟中的政府與同業組合：以大韓紡織協會為事例

無相關著作

1.	規費作為政策工具--以高速公路通行費相關問題為中心
2.	提高罰金罰鍰及規費問題
3.	財政收支劃分法修正後地方財政問題之探討
4.	凍省後縣市財政健全之道--以臺中市為例
5.	稅負規費徵收對臺灣地區小型汽車銷售量之影響--模糊迴歸與傳統迴歸於公共政策探討之應用
6.	平衡小汽車成長可行措施之模糊多評準決策--羅吉斯特模型與模糊TOPSIS方法之應用實證
7.	受益者付費原則與規費徵收
8.	從法律面探討行政規費之徵收
9.	規費制度之概況及其改進
10.	縣市鄉鎮各項規費收入之探討
11.	德國聯邦預算監督機制之探討
12.	清代庫倫的規費、雜賦與商人
13.	從各國專利制度中探討我國延長設計專利權期限之可行性
14.	校園開放政策及其法令之研究分析
15.	國際投資保障條約下投資人對地主國仲裁費用問題

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫