:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:改進公務人員考績制度的議題探討:公平原則觀點
書刊名:文官制度
作者:張瓊玲
作者(外文):Chang, Chiung-ling
出版日期:2009
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁171-197
主題關鍵詞:公平原則考績制度考績指標Equal principlePerformance appraisal systemPerformance index
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:63
期刊論文
1.林水波(19890600)。考績正義論。行政學報,21,1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張瓊玲(20050700)。公務人員考績制度之功能發揮與檢討展望。考銓季刊,43,122-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳金貴(19981000)。結合效率與民主的人事政策: 政策再造中人力再造計畫的探討。公務人員月刊,28,3-21。  延伸查詢new window
4.丘昌泰(19980500)。建立績效導向的公務員俸給政策:公共管理的觀點。空大行政學報,8,103-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Greenberg, Jerald(1990)。Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts。Journal of Applied Psychology,75(5),561-568。  new window
6.Greenberg, Jerald(1987)。A taxonomy of organizational justice theories。Academy of Management Review,12(1),9-22。  new window
學位論文
1.洪國平(1998)。中華民國公務人員考績制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄒美完(2006)。考績公平認知對工作士氣影響之研究--以臺北市公立高中職學校人事人員為例(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Flynn, N.(1997)。Public Sector Management。NJ。  new window
2.徐木蘭(2000)。360度績效評估是政府部門的胎盤素。行政管理論文選輯。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hodgetts, R. M.、Kuratko, D. F.(1986)。Effective Small Business Management。Orlando, FL:Academic Press College Division。  new window
4.Tornow, W. W.、London, M.、CCL Associates(1998)。Maximizing the Value of 360-degree Feedback。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
5.Thibaut, J.、Walker, L.(1975)。Procedure justice: A psychological analysis。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.林水波(1989)。考績制度--理論研析與經驗驗證。台北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Denhardt, J. V.、Denhardt, R. B.(2003)。The New Public Serving: Serving, not Steering。Armonk, New York:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
8.Latham, G. P.、Wexley, K. N.(1994)。Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal。Reading, MA:Addison Wesley。  new window
9.吳瓊恩、李允傑、陳銘薰(2001)。公共管理。台北:智勝文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Fenwick, John(1995)。Managing Local Government。London:Chapman and Hall。  new window
11.Parsons, Talcott(1951)。Social System。New York:Glencoe, Ill:Free Press。  new window
12.Walster, E.、Walster, G. W.、Berscheid, E. S.(1978)。Equity: Theory and Research。Boston, Massachusetts:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
13.Nozick, Robert(1974)。Anarchy, State and Utopia。Blackwell。  new window
14.Homans, George Caspar(1961)。Social behavior: Its elementary forms。Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.。  new window
15.Rawls, John(1999)。A Theory of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.銓敘部(2008)。民國九十六年銓敘統計年報,http://www.mocs.gov.tw, 2009/01/20。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.施能傑(1993)。考績謬誤的類型與原因:理論闡述與經驗分析。行政管理論文選輯。銓敘部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Leventhal, Gerald S.、Karuza, Jurgis、Fry, William R.(1980)。Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preference。Justice and Social Interaction。New York:Springer。  new window
3.Bies, R. J.、Moag, J. S.(1986)。International Justice: Communication Criteria for Fairness。Research In Organizational Behavior。Greenwich, CT:JAI Press。  new window
4.Leventhal, G. S.(1976)。Fairness in social relationships。Contemporary topics in social psychology。Morristown, NJ:General Learning Press。  new window
5.Leventhal, Gerald S.(1980)。What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships。Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research。Plenum Press。  new window
6.Adams, John Stacey(1965)。Inequity in social exchange。Advances in experimental social psychology。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE