資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.191.128.22)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Assessing the Effects of Ability Grouping on EFL Student English Listening and Reading Proficiencies
書刊名:
人文社會科學研究
作者:
劉慧如
作者(外文):
Liu, Hui-ju
出版日期:
2009
卷期:
3:2
頁次:
頁133-148
主題關鍵詞:
語言表現
;
能力分班
;
性別差異
;
Language performance
;
Ability grouping
;
Gender differences
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:
8
點閱:23
將學生依不同能力等級分班實施英語教學已是台灣高等教育的常見措施。本研究主要探討能力分班教學的成效,是否在不同能力等級的班級中學習的大學生其英語聽力與閱讀能力能持續顯著地進步。研究樣本包括122位大學一年級的學生,他們在入學之後馬上就依其英語能力被編入不同能力等級的班級。統計方法的使用是在探究下列三個研究問題:(1)被分配到不同能力等級的學生其英語聽力與閱讀能力在學年末是否能有顯著的進步?(2)被分配到不同能力等級的學生其整體的英語能力在學年末是否能有顯著的進步?(3)學生的英語聽力、閱讀與整體的英語能力的變化是否存在顯著的能力等級的差異?研究結果顯示不同能力等級學生的英語能力在學年末都有顯著的進步,唯一沒有顯著差異的是高級班學生的英語閱讀能力。研究期間能力等級對學生的英語閱讀與聽力的進展存在有高度顯著的影響效果。
以文找文
Grouping students of similar ability for English instruction has become a common practice in higher education in Taiwan. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether EFL college students of different abilities are able to make significant progress in their language performance in homogeneously grouped classes over time. The sample was 122 freshmen who had been assigned to different levels of English classes after entering the university. Statistical methods were conducted to address the following research questions: (1) whether ability-grouped students' listening and reading proficiencies significantly improved over the one-year period after being grouped, (2) whether the overall English proficiency of homogeneously grouped EFL students significantly improved over time, and (3) whether there are significant level differences in students' progress in English listening, reading, and overall proficiency scores over the duration of the study. The findings indicate that students at all ability levels attain significantly higher English proficiency scores over time, except for the reading proficiency scores for the high-ability group. Both the timing and level effects are highly significant on students' progress in English reading and listening performance.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Ireson, J.、Hallam, S.、Plewis, I.(2001)。Ability grouping in secondary schools: Effects on pupils' self-concepts。British Journal of Educational Psychology,71(2),315-326。
2.
Marsh, H. W.、Chessor, D.、Craven, R.、Roche, L.(1995)。The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again。American Educational Research Journal,32(2),285-319。
3.
Gamoran, Adam、Nystrand, Martin、Berends, Mark、LePore, Paul C.(1995)。An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping。American Educational Research Journal,32(4),687-715。
4.
Fuligni, A. J.、Eccles, J. S.、Barber, B. L.(1995)。The long-term effects of seventh-grade ability grouping in mathematics。Journal of Early Adolescence,15(1),58-89。
5.
Rogers, K. B.、Kimpston, R. D.(1992)。Acceleration: What we do vs. what we know。Educational Leadership,50(2),58-61。
6.
Cheung, C. K.、Rudowicz, E.(2003)。Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong。The Journal of Educational Research,96(4),241-254。
7.
Ireson, J.、Hallam, S.、Hurley, C.(2005)。What are the effects of ability grouping on GCSE attainment?。British Educational Research Journal,31(4),443-458。
8.
Kulik, James A.、Kulik, Chen-Lin C.(1992)。Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs。Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),73-77。
9.
Liang, T. L.(2003)。Cooperative learning: An alternative to ability grouping。Journal of Paisa Humanities and Social Sciences,2,141-175。
10.
Liu, W. C.、Wang, C. K. J.、Parkins, E. J.(2005)。A Longitudinal Study of Students' Academic Self-Concept in a Streamed Setting: The Singapore Context。British Journal of Educational Psychology,75,567-586。
11.
Rogers, K. B.(2002)。Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers。Roeper Review,24(3),102-107。
12.
Slavin, R. E.(1988)。Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schools。Educational Leadership,46(1),67-77。
13.
Slavin, R. E(1991)。Are cooperative learning and untracking harmful to the gifted。Educational Leadership,48(6),68-71。
14.
Slavin, R. E.(1993)。Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives。Elementary School Journal,93(5),535-552。
15.
Tieso, C. L.(2003)。Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore。Roeper Review,26(1),29-37。
16.
Gamoran, A.(1992)。Is ability grouping equitable?。Educational Leadership,50(2),11-17。
17.
Slavin, Robert E.(1990)。Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis。Review of Educational Research,60(3),471-499。
18.
De Fraine, Bieke、Van Damme, Jan、Onghena, Patrick(2007)。A longitudinal analysis of gender differences in academic self-concept and language achievement: A multivariate multilevel latent growth approach。Contemporary Educational Psychology,32(1),132-150。
19.
Hallinan, Maureen T.(1994)。Tracking: From Theory to Practice。Sociology of Education,67(2),79-84。
20.
Slavin, R. E.(1987)。Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis。Review of Educational Research,57(3),293-336。
21.
余綺芳(19941200)。The Assessment of Ability Grouping in the College Lab Program: The Soochow Experience。東吳外語學報,10,45-77。
22.
Figlio, D. N.、Page, M. E.(2002)。School choice and the distributional effects of ability tracking: Does separation increase inequality?。Journal of Urban Economics,51,497-514。
23.
Kulik, C. L. C.、Kulik, J. A.(1982)。Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings。American Educational Research Journal,19(3),415-428。
會議論文
1.
Braddock, J. H.、Slavin, R. E.(1992)。Why ability grouping must end: Achieving excellence and equity in American education。The Common Destiny Conference。Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University。
圖書
1.
Fiedler-Brand, E.、Lange, R. E.、Winebrenner, S.(1992)。Tracking, ability grouping and the gifted。Norristown, PA:Pennsylvania Association for Gifted Education。
2.
Hoffer, T. B.、Gamoran, A.(1993)。Effects of instructional differences among ability groups on student achievement in middle-school science and mathematics。DeKalb, IL:Madison, WI:Social Science Research Institute:Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools。
3.
Loveless, T.(1998)。The tracking and ability grouping debate。Washington, DC:Thomas B. Fordlham Foundation。
4.
Oakes, J.(1985)。Keeping track: How schools structure inequality。Birmingham, NY:New Haven:Vail-Ballou Press:Yale University Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
從一所頂尖大學英文輔導班學生觀點初探英文能力分級教學之成效與影響
2.
Conceptualisation of English Ability Grouping for Non-English Majors in Taiwanese Higher Education
3.
課程分級分流實施成效間之研究--以臺灣北區某私立大學為例
4.
私立科技大學四技大一新生英文能力分級教學成效分析
5.
科技大學新生對大一英文分級教學問卷調查研究
6.
Perceptions of Academic Self in Ability-Grouped English Classroom: A One-Year Study of Gender Differences
7.
英語分級教學成效分析--以中區某科技大學為例
8.
The Relationship between EFL Student Academic Self-Concept and Language Performance
9.
Evaluation of Ability Grouping and Mixed-Ability Grouping Practices in Junior High English Class
10.
Student-centered vs. Teacher-centered Approach in an EFL Lab Listening Class
11.
Restructuring of the FEL Lab Listening Class: The Soochow University Experience
12.
The Assessment of Ability Grouping in the College Lab Program: The Soochow Experience
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code