:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:軍隊的階級倫理如何框住人際互動:憲兵義務役士兵的軍事社會化經驗
書刊名:復興崗學報
作者:錢淑芬廖帝涵
作者(外文):Chein, Shu-fenLiao, Ti-han
出版日期:2009
卷期:96
頁次:頁79-105
主題關鍵詞:軍事社會化階級互動全控機構Military socializationRank framework of military ethicsInteractionTotal institution
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:69
軍事社會化是義務役男入伍後,從老百姓蛻變成為軍人的過程。在這個過程中,階級是軍人身份的刻印,也是啟動義務役男學習如何„當兵‟的按鈕。因為軍中的人際關係與互動,已經被定格在階級倫理的框架下。義務役士兵在軍事社會化的過程中,面對場域的全控性和微觀權力的教化技術,如何透過人際互動體會階級對軍人的意義,進而影響他學習如何扮演軍人的角色,這是研究者感到興趣的問題。本文主旨,就在於從軍事社會化的脈絡,以義務役士兵的處境和視界,來理解他們的軍中人際互動的主觀經驗,以詮釋軍階倫理對他們學習如何當兵所具有的意義。其次,由於義務役士兵剛入伍時,面對軍隊全控性的場域和微觀權力的教化技術,在心理和生理上往往會因為文化震撼,而出現部隊的適應徵候。希望研究結果對於探討士兵經歷文化震撼的壓力與因應,可以作為未來研究的基礎。
A civilian is transformed into a solider through the military socialization. The soldiers with the rank that represents their status in the military stratification has influences for them in learning how to be a solider in this process. The soldiers' interaction at armed forces are limited to the rank framework of military ethics. Since the soldiers are personally on the total institution, also are personally to go through the situation that is forced by the micropower with function of discipline and sanction in the military socialization. The author intends to investigate how the draft soldiers understand the rank implications at armed forces through the interaction of subject and object in the military socialization, and how such experiences affect them to learn how to play their military role. The author adopts "in-depth interview" to collect data. Then the author interprets those data in the social context of military institutes, from the view of the draft soldiers to understand their experiences about the interpersonal relationship and interaction at armed forces, in order to realize the meaning of the rank of military ethics for them being a solider. Secondary, because of the cultural shock, once the draft soldiers firstly get into the situation that is full of restrictions and forces by the micropower on the everyone's behaviors in every day probably causes mental or physical symptoms. As a result of this study, the author plans further to investigate the soliders' inadaptability and coping under the stresses in the process of soldiers' military socialization.
期刊論文
1.孫敏華(20001100)。役男服役歷程及影響其適應因素之研究--以個案縱貫法探討。軍事社會科學學刊,7,103-133。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hebden, J. E.(1986)。Adopting an Organization's Culture: The Socialization of Graduate Trainees。Organizational Dynamics,Summer,54-72。  new window
3.陳曉天(20000600)。員工組織社會化程度與升遷關係之研究。商管科技季刊,1(2),185-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Jones, G. R.(1986)。Socialization tactics, self-efficacy and newcomer adjustment to the organization。Academy of Management Journal,29,262-279。  new window
5.錢淑芬(19990600)。國軍軍官人事行政「階職制度」的分析--從唐代武官考銓制度的啟示談起。復興崗學報,66,213-245。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.卓淑玲、邱發忠(19991200)。士兵生活適應問題、因應策略及相關變項關係之初探。復興崗學報,68,165-202。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Soeters, J.、Recht, R.(1998)。Culture and discipline in military academies: an international comparison。Journal of Political and Military Sociology,26(2),169-189。  new window
8.孫敏華(20001200)。役男壓力來源、因應方式與軍中適應關係之研究。中華心理衛生學刊,13(4),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡文佩、李選、盧成皆(19960900)。入伍新兵壓力感受與其身心困擾之探討。長庚護理,7(3)=15,57-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.錢淑芬(19930600)。國軍軍事學校「軍事社會化」之研究。復興崗學報,49,333-364。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.洪光遠(19980100)。新新人類部隊生活適應問題的探討。軍事社會科學半年刊,1,131-151。  延伸查詢new window
12.錢淑芬(19910600)。從軍隊的「角色訓練制度」論「角色認知」對軍隊生活適應的影響。復興崗學報,45,443-462。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Soeters, J.(1997)。Value 0rientations in Military Academies: A Thirteen Country Study。Armed Forces & Society,20(1),7-32。  new window
會議論文
1.錢淑芬(2003)。從軍事組織文化論人文教育與軍官角色性格。軍事社會科學知識的應用與發展:第六屆國軍軍事社會科學研討會。臺北:政治作戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心。1-51。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Andersen, Margaret L.、Taylor, Howard F.(2000)。Sociology: Understanding a diverse society。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning。  new window
2.國防部(1999)。中華民國軍人禮節。聯勤北部印製廠。  延伸查詢new window
3.歐振文(2001)。現代大兵族。臺北:黎明文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Robbins, P. S.(1988)。Organization Behavior concepts, controversies, and applications。New York:print-Hall。  new window
5.Hofstede, Geert Jan、Pedersen, Paul B.、Hofstede, Gert(2002)。Exploring Culture。London:Intercultural Press Inc.。  new window
6.Blumer, Herbert(1969)。Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method。University of California Press。  new window
7.Dreyfus, Hubert L.、Rabinow, Paul、錢俊(1995)。傅柯:超越結構主義與詮釋學。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
8.Hofstede, Geert H.、Hofstede, Gert Jan(2005)。Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
9.Goffman, E.(1961)。Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates。London:Penguin。  new window
10.Jenkins, Richard、王志弘、許妍飛(2006)。社會認同。台北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Merquior, J. G.、陳瑞麟(1998)。傅柯。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
12.Smart, Barry、蔡采秀(1998)。傅柯。臺北:巨流圖書。  延伸查詢new window
13.Hofstede, Geert H.(1980)。Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values。Beverly Hills, California:Sage。  new window
14.Schein, Edgar H.(1985)。Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view。Jossey-Bass。  new window
圖書論文
1.Maanen, J. Van、Schein, E. H.(1979)。Towards a Theory of Organizational Socialization。Research in Organizational Behavior。Greenwich, CT:JAI Press。  new window
2.Maanen, J. Van(1976)。Breaking in: Socialization to Work。Handbook of Work, Organizational and Society。Chicago:Rand-McNally。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE