:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣農產品貿易競爭力指標之研究
書刊名:貿易調查叢刊
作者:楊明憲 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Min-hsien
出版日期:2009
卷期:20:2
頁次:頁1-40
主題關鍵詞:競爭力農產品貿易顯示性比較利益CompetitivenessAgricultural product tradeRevealed comparative advantage
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:120
摘 要 本文從貿易競爭的觀點,分析有關產業競爭力指標的構成及內涵, 提出以貿易表現指標(Trade Performance Index, TPI)的運用為主,研究目的 即在於建立各項產業競爭力指標,並解讀其內涵,以作為產業競爭策略 與受進口損害救助之參考。研究結果顯示:台灣新鮮食品在進口國市場 占有率並沒有隨加入世界貿易組織(World Trade Organization, WTO)之後 進口市場的擴大而提高,此係地理專業和產品專業的優勢衰退所致;另 在個別產品的顯示性比較利益指數(Balassa Index, BI)表現,僅有填充用之 羽毛及羽絨、活魚(內陸活鰻養殖)、冷凍魚、澱粉製品等四種產品的BI 值大於1,顯示在出口市場上具有顯示性比較利益而可專業生產之外,其 餘農產品皆不具競爭力。在此情形下之政策涵義,有可能國內生產的部 分將為進口所取代,故在防衛機制或受進口損害救助方面,即須特別的 注意。
Abstract From the viewpoint of trade competition, this study applied Trade Performance Index (TPI) to decompose the index content. Its purpose is to provide more information about competition identity in order to judge competition strategies and import relief. The result indicates that the share of Taiwan’s fresh food in foreign imported market doesn’t increase on Taiwan’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). It is a result of a decrease in the advantage of geography profession and product profession. In addition, the performance of Balassa Index (BI), which reveals comparative advantage, has only feathers and down, fish (Inland live eel aquaculture), frozen fish and starch products with BI number larger than 1. The result also shows that only the aforementioned enjoy comparative advantage in domestic production and export, the rest of domestic agricultural products lacks competitiveness. In such conditions, some of the domestic agricultural products will be replaced by foreign import, and the government should come up with a Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM) and relief measures to protect domestic farmers against damage inflicted by import.
期刊論文
1.Grein, A. F.、Craig, C. S.(1996)。Economic Performance Over Time: Does Porter's Diamond Hold at the Nation Level?。International Executive,38(3),303-322。  new window
2.Dunning, John H.(1995)。Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in An Age of Alliance Capitalism。Journal of International Business Studies,26(3),461-491。  new window
3.Balassa, B.(1965)。Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage。Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies,33,99-117。  new window
4.D'Cruz, Joseph R.、Rugman, A. M.(1993)。Developing International Competitiveness: The Five Partners Model。Business Quarterly,58(2),60-72。  new window
5.周濟(1996)。「從總體經濟面看國家競爭力」。《經濟前瞻》,48,50。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Zhang, Yimin and Qiao Hua(1998)。“The International Competitive Power of Chinese Machinery Industry,”。  new window
研究報告
1.工研院(1997)。「我國IC 產業國際競爭力研究」。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳中峻(2006)。「我國農產品受進口損害救濟制度之檢討與進口損害指標之建立」。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Porter, Michael E. and Clayton M. Christensen(1999)。“Microeconomic Competitiveness: Findings from the 1999 Executive Survey,”。  new window
圖書
1.余朝權(1994)。產業競爭分析專論。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.金偉燦、莫伯尼、黃秀媛(2005)。藍海策略:開創無人競爭的全新市場。天下文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Porter, Michael E.(1985)。Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance。New York, NY:Schuster Inc.。  new window
4.Kotler, Philip J.(1991)。Marketing Management: analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control。Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Massel, Mark S.(1962)。“Indicators of Competition,”。Competition and Monopoly:Legal and Economic Issues。Washington, DC。  new window
6.McNulty, Paul J.(1975)。“Economic Theory and the Meaning of Competition,”。The Competitive Economy。Morristown, N. J。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE