Objective: Healthcare management journals provide not only new knowledge for healthcare professionals but also reflect the development of healthcare management practices. This study used content analysis to review and compare the articles published by two major healthcare management journals, the Journal of Healthcare Management (JHM) and Hospital, in Taiwan. Methods: A total of 579 articles published between 2000 and 2008 in Hospital and JHM were reviewed. The content analyses covered research topic, article category, sampling method, reliability and validity, and statistical methodology. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were employed to compare the differences in the articles from the two target journals. Results: Overall, the most published categories of articles in Hospital and JHM were "quality management" and "health insurance and health care market", respectively. Among the research methods, survey research was the most commonly utilized method in both journals. The use of statistical analysis such as regression or ANOVA was common in JHM. In contrast, many published articles did not use any statistical analysis or used only descriptive statistics in Hospital. Conclusion: Since 2000, the focal issues in healthcare management in Taiwan have been the healthcare services market, health insurance, and quality management as determined by articles published in Hospital and JHM. Hospital is a practice oriented journal and JHM is a theoretical and academically oriented journal. Future improvement in the quality of articles published by Hospital and JHM should focus on sampling methods and the reliability and validity of research measurements.