:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:看不見的因素:科技社群定住區位之鄰近性考量--以新竹地區為例
書刊名:建築與規劃學報
作者:薛卜賓胡太山解鴻年 引用關係賈秉靜賴玫樺
作者(外文):Shiue, Bu-binHu, Tai-shanHsieh, Hung-nienChia, Ping-chingLai, Mei-hua
出版日期:2010
卷期:11:1
頁次:頁53-76
主題關鍵詞:新竹科學園區定住區位選擇鄰近性Hsin-chu science industrial parkResidential location choiceProximity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:29
本研究立基於社會、認同與認知鄰近性之觀點,探討科技社群是否經由購屋動機、資訊搜尋與定住區位選擇流程中,其購屋資訊學習在非正式互動、社會網絡建立與共同的學習文化下,而能直接評估居住環境。因此,研究目的著重於檢定個體鄰近性對於定住區位選擇產生影響的假說下,並進一步以迴歸分析探討相關個體鄰近性因子與空間鄰近性之關聯,期望能從中解析新竹地區空間發展變遷的背後涵義。研究發現,科技社群選擇住宅行爲是經兩種不同的鄰近性路徑進行,其一是對於園區知識網絡、地方環境認同而依附於居住環境行爲之內部鄰近性(社會、認同鄰近);另一則是爲了獲取住宅資訊學習之外部鄰近性(認知鄰近)。在個體鄰近性的作用下,其空間發展變遷所呈現的是,社會、認同鄰近必須在空間上彼此聚集鄰近在同一地區;而外部認知鄰近性雖非空間鄰近性之直接因子,但卻有助於科技人才社會鄰近性之互動。故此,個體鄰近性產生內生的拉力促使新竹地區之空間擴展逐漸趨於減緩。
Based on the viewpoint of social, identified and cognitive proximity, this study will discuss whether science and technology social workers are able to evaluate their living environment directly in the process of motivating housing purchase, searching for information, and making residential location decisions when they learn about housing purchase based on informal interactions, social networking, and common learning culture. This study uses regression analysis to explore the correlation between individual proximity factors and spatial proximity based on the hypothesis that individual proximity impacts residential location choices of science and technology social workers. Through this analysis, the authors hope to find explanation behind the spatial development transformation of Hsinchu District. The result of this study indicates that housing choice behaviors of science and technology social workers follow two different proximity paths. First, internal proximity factors (social and identified proximity) show that the groups identify with knowledge networks within HSIP and the local environment, and thus conform to residential environmental behaviors. Second, external proximity (cognitive proximity) refers to the acquisition of housing information. Under the influence of individual proximity, social and identified proximity require agglomeration in the same geographic area. Although external cognitive proximity does not lead directly to spatial proximity, it benefits science and technology professionals through social proximity interactions. As a result, the pulling force created by individual proximity slowed down the spatial expansion of Hsinchu District.
期刊論文
1.胡太山、解鴻年、薛卜賓、賈秉靜(20061200)。從人口與定住向度探討高科技區域空間之演進--以新竹科學園區暨周邊地區為例。環境與世界,14,1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Boschma, Ron A.、Lambooy, Jan G.(1999)。Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography。Journal of Evolutionary Economics,9(4),411-429。  new window
3.Torre, A.、Gilly, J. P.(2000)。On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics。Regional Studies,34(2),169-180。  new window
4.Audretsch, D. B.、Feldman, M. P.(1996)。R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production。The American Economic Review,86(3),630-640。  new window
5.Mitchell, A. A.(1981)。The dimensions of advertising involvement。Advances in Consumer Research,8(1),25-30。  new window
6.林楨家、馮正民、李洋寧(20040900)。知識可及性對創新的影響:以臺灣北部區域電子產業為例。運輸計劃,33(3),577-601。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.胡太山、張素莉(20010400)。技術基礎設施、產業聚群與與地方創新網絡建構之初探--以新竹科學園區暨周邊地區為例。建築與規劃學報,2(1),27-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Baptista, R.(1996)。Research round up: industrial clusters and technological innovation。Business Strategy Review,7(2),59-64。  new window
9.胡太山、解鴻年、王俊堯(20020500)。新竹科學園周邊地區社經發展變遷之調查研究。都市與計劃,29(1),37-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hu, Tai-shan、Lin, Chien-yuan、Chang, Su-Li(200506)。Role of Interaction between Technological Communities and Industrial Clustering in Innovative Activity: The Case of Hsinchu District, Taiwan。Urban Studies,42,1139-1160。  new window
11.Tiebout, Charles M.(1956)。A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure。Journal of Political Economy,64(5),416-424。  new window
12.Boschma, R. A.(2005)。Proximity and Innovation: a critical assessment。Regional Studies,39(1),61-74。  new window
13.Murray, Keith B.(1991)。A test of services marketing theory: Consumer information acquisition activities。Journal of Marketing,55(1),10-25。  new window
14.Williams, Daniel R.、Patterson, Michael E.、Roggenbuck, Joseph W.、Watson, Alan E.(1992)。Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining Emotional and symbolic attachment to place。Leisure Sciences,14(1),29-46。  new window
15.Rosen, Sherwin(1974)。Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition。Journal of Political Economy,82(1),34-55。  new window
16.Leckie, Gloria J.、Pettigrew, Karen E.、Sylvain, Christian(1996)。Modeling the Information Seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers。Library Quarterly,66(2),161-193。  new window
17.Granovetter, Mark S.(1985)。Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness。American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510。  new window
18.胡太山、解鴻年(2004)。高科技地區社群定住區演化之初探-以新竹地區為例。「城市規劃滙刊」,151,74-78。  延伸查詢new window
19.張聖琳(2004)。跨海的家-從飄洋過海的矽谷地景談美國郊區住宅亞太化現象。「造園季刊」,51,5-10。  延伸查詢new window
20.Amin, A.、Wilkinson F.(1999)。Learning, proximity and industrial performance: An introduction。Cambridge Journal of Economics,23(2),121-125。  new window
21.Boschma, R. A.(2004)。Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective。Regional Studies,38(9),1001-1014。  new window
22.Harrison, B. ,(1992)。“Industrial districts: Old wines in new bottles”。Regional Studies,26(5),469–483。  new window
23.Hugstand, P., J. W. Taylor and G. D. Bruce,(1987)。“The effects of social class and perceived risk on consumer information search”。Journal of Services Marketing,1(1),47-52。  new window
24.Lin, Chien-Yuan,(1997)。“Technopolis development: An assessment of the Hsinchu experience”。International Planning Studies,2(2),257-272。  new window
25.Maskell, P. and A. Malmberg,(1999)。“The competitiveness of firms and regions: „Ubiquitification‟ and the importance of localized learning”。European Urban and Regional Studies,6(1),9-25。  new window
26.Masser, I.,(1991)。“By accident or design: Some lessons from technology led local economic development initiatives”。Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies,3,78-93。  new window
會議論文
1.Chang, Sheng-Lin,(1999)。“Image is more important than experience: A case study of hi-tech home building in response to shifting home identities”。Orlando, Florida, USA。  new window
2.Oh, Deog-Seong and Sang-Ryong Cha ,(2001)。“Critical success factors of technopolis for regional innovation: Case study of Daedeok Science Town”。Taejon, Korea。  new window
3.Wu, Kang-Li,(1998)。“A study of the impact of science park development on housing development: A case study of Silicon Valley and its implications for Taiwan‟s science park planning”。Taipei, Taiwan。  new window
研究報告
1.Verspagen, B. and W. Schoenmakers,(2000)。The spatial dimension of knowledge spillovers in europe: evidence from firm patenting data。  new window
學位論文
1.呂清松(1997)。科學園區對地方發展之論爭與臺灣實證:新竹科學園區個案研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.沈道剛(2002)。「科學園區員工住宅需求及通勤行為之研究 」。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪芳傑(2000)。「科學園區科技人員住宅區位選擇因素 之研究-以新竹科學工業園區為例 」。  延伸查詢new window
4.張瑋寧(1996)。「高科技人口住宅市場 NBER 模式之研究-以新竹科學工業園區為例 」。  延伸查詢new window
5.莊錦爐(1998)。「新竹科學園區員工住宅需求對周邊房地產影響之研究 」。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃若帆(2003)。「以 Logit 模式分析科技人員住宅選擇之研究 」。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Allen, T. J.(1977)。Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
2.Friedmann, John(1966)。Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
3.Porter, M. E.(1998)。On Competition。Harvard Business School。  new window
4.McAndrew, Francis T.(1993)。Environmental Psychology。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing。  new window
5.Polanyi, Karl、黃樹民、石佳音、廖立(1944)。The Great Transformation: the Political and Economic Origins of Our Time。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
6.Nelson, Richard R.、Winter, Sidney G.(1982)。An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change。Cambridge, Massachusetts:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Saxenian, Anna Lee(1994)。Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
8.Antonelli, C. ,(1995)。The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics。Boston, MA。  new window
9.Oakey, R. P. ,(1981)。High Technology Industry and Industrial Location。Farnborough。  new window
10.Perez, C. and L. Soete,(1988)。“Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows”。Technical Change and Economic Theory。London。  new window
11.Smilor, R., Kozmetsky, W. and Gibson D.,(1988)。Creating the Technopolics。Cambridge, MA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lundvall, B. A.(1993)。“Explaining interfirm cooperation and innovation: Limits of the transaction-cost approach”。The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks。London:Routledge。  new window
2.Edquist, Charles、Johnson, Bjorn(1997)。Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation。Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations。London:Pinter Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE