:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「姐姐媽媽真偉大!」--女性從軍議題之比較法脈絡觀察
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:陳宜倩 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Yi-chien
出版日期:2010
卷期:26
頁次:頁135-191
主題關鍵詞:女性主義法學性別平等性別勞動區隔女性軍人男子氣概Feminist jurisprudenceSex/gender equalityGender divisions of laborWomen soldiersMasculinity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:382
  • 點閱點閱:157
本文採比較法學及女性主義法學視角,藉對台灣女性軍人之訪談,搜尋並定性本國與他國相較之下最迫切的軍事性別議題。次在美國、德國及台灣各自社會脈絡下,從三國關於女性從軍實際案例之法律論述出發,以微觀方式初探女性從軍議題在各國性別平等論述之再現。文末提議一方面在方法上能夠理解各國現存之性別議題與論述,提問是否有發展全球女性主義理論之可能;一方面整理台灣在地性別平等論述之演繹,以促進軍事體系之性別平等實踐。台灣女軍人在入學之際即遭遇不同的入學錄取名額限制與評價標準,然而越來越多的個別女性報考投效軍旅,加上女性主義團體之性別平等倡議,究竟何者為女性成功進入軍校軍隊且確保有平等機會與滿意職業生涯的關鍵要件?首要突破乃為招生招募之性別限額、軍事教育的性別差別待遇、就業之性別區隔、職業與家庭責任之兼顧。男女有別、性別隔離乃為長期孕育「女性為次等公民」劣勢的「自然」土壤。我們需揭示女性在公領域曾經且持續遭受歧視,且由於在私領域男女高度融合,非如其他分散又隔絕之政治少數,歧視反而更加細緻、幽微,法律的正式挑戰可作為一種方法,來創造協商與改變空間,但更重要是提高偵測並解構性別迷思之社會文化條件,營造更大規模的公共討論平台。
This research employs multiple standpoints including comparative law, feminist jurisprudence and gender study, and conducts interviews with women soldiers to navigate and locate urgent issues on gender and the military in Taiwan. In this article, I conduct a comparative law and public policy analysis in three different jurisdictions including the US, Germany and Taiwan. This project suggests, on the one hand, a methodological inquiry into the possibility of a global feminism to understand and to contextualize each country's unique set of issues; on the other hand, addresses gender equality within cultural and legal discourse concerning women soldiers. As prevalent today, women in the military in Taiwan were selected separately from men using a different set of criteria, and women are mostly limited to administrative work along the gender divide. The military school system currently admits only a certain quota of female students. However, this practice has been challenged both by individual women who want to cross the gender divide, and by feminists who advocate for gender equality as a national agenda. What could then be the key factors to integrate female soldiers successfully and ensure they have equal opportunities to engage in all levels and gain no less satisfaction? Firstly, we need to challenge the female quota on gaining entrance to military schools, the sex-based treatment in military education and on job assignments, and also tackle the dilemma of work and family. The pervasiveness of gender divide in all aspects of social life hinders women's efforts to achieve their full potential in military. We must reveal the continuous, long-existing gender discrimination against women in the public sphere since the private lives of men and women are highly integrated. Thus, gender discrimination against women is most difficult to identify, sometimes too subtle to tell. To launch a legal challenge can be one of the ways to negotiate and gain more power to fight against gender discrimination, at the very least, to facilitate a change in culture and education so as to alter people's behavior and to create a public platform for dialogues and debates.
期刊論文
1.陳宜倩(20081200)。改寫異性戀霸權腳本?--通姦罪與罰之女性主義法學透視。世新法學,2(1),1-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.司法院(1994)。司法院公報36(12),1。  延伸查詢new window
3.司法院(1996)。司法院公報38(8),45。  延伸查詢new window
4.司法院(1998)。司法院公報40(5),22。  延伸查詢new window
5.司法院(1998)。司法院公報40(8),1。  延伸查詢new window
6.李亞明、李嬌瑩(200006)。從女性主義看中共解放軍女性軍人之發展。復興崗學報,69,29-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.沈明室(1999)。女性擔任戰鬥性職務之研究。軍事社會科學半年刊,4,45-62。  延伸查詢new window
8.沈明室(199909)。戰爭與女性軍人--以美國為例。國防雜誌,15(3),57-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.沈明室(199911)。各國女性軍人發展概述。國防雜誌,15(5),33-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.洪文龍(2000)。哥哥爸爸真偉大?當兵的男性經驗。兩性平等教育季刊,12,47-50。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳竹梅(2004)。從「美伊戰爭」潔西卡林琪獲救事件談戰爭的文化研究。復興崗學報,81,55-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.楊智傑(2002)。女性不用當兵?--檢討釋字490號中提及的兩性差異操作標準。憲政時代,28(1),45-65。  延伸查詢new window
13.Brittenham, K.(2004)。Equal protection theory and the Harvey Milk High School: Why anti-subordination alone is not enough。Boston College Law Review,45(4),869-904。  new window
14.Gill, L.(1997)。Creating citizens, making men: The military and masculinity in Bolivia。Cultural Anthropology,12(4),527-550。  new window
15.Laubinger, H.、Repkeitz, U.(2000)。Freiwilliger Waffendienst von Frauen in der Bundeswehr。Verwaltungsarchiv,91(2),297。  new window
16.Mückl, S.(2000)。Zulässigkeit des freiwilligen Dienstes von Frauen in der Bundeswehr-Kollision von nationalem Verfassungsrecht und europäischem Gemeinschaftsrecht。Jura,8,406-415。  new window
17.Nielsen, V.(2001)。Women in uniform: Examines how far women have been integrated in NATO forces。NATO Review,49(2),26-27。  new window
18.畢恆達(20000800)。走入歧途的男性氣概養成過程。兩性平等教育季刊,12,44-46。  延伸查詢new window
19.蔡綺(20071100)。美國二次大戰期間女性形象戰爭海報之研究。商業設計學報,11,118-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.焦興鎧(20011200)。歐洲聯盟兩性工作平等法制之研究。歐美研究,31(4),753-818。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.虞立莉(20031200)。性別與軍隊組織:我國中高階女性軍人與軍隊體制互動經驗探討。社區發展季刊,104,381-401。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.周海娟(20040600)。從「巾幗英雄」到「職業婦女」:我國女性在軍隊中角色的歷史變遷。東吳社會學報,16,149-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.蕭尤雯(20040400)。性別角色對女性軍人工作表現之探討--以擔任領導職的女性軍官為例。憲兵半年刊,58,118-132。  延伸查詢new window
24.Case, M. A.(2000)。"The very stereotype the law condemns": Constitutional sex discrimination law as a quest for perfect proxies。Cornell Law Review,85(5),1447-1491。  new window
學位論文
1.湯愛梅(2005)。國軍兩性平權之質化研究--以軍職與母職衝突為中心    (碩士論文)。國防管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chen, Y. C.(2001)。Men for feminism: Self-development as a core value in achieving gender equality-A comparative study of childcare leave laws with proposals for reform in Taiwan(博士論文)。Cornell University Law School。  new window
3.王志弘(2000)。軍隊文化、男性氣概與性傾向壓迫--台灣男同性戀者的兵役經驗分析(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.裴學儒(2001)。軍隊文化、男性氣概與性傾向壓迫--臺灣男同性戀者的兵役經驗分析(碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.秦光輝(1997)。「當兵」現形記--從臺灣男性兵役經驗看軍隊父權體制再生產的性別邏輯(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.高穎超(2006)。做兵、儀式、男人類:台灣義務役男服役過程之陽剛氣質研究(2000-2006)(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.林政彥(2001)。從同性戀者入伍服役政策論同性戀者權利主體地位之建構與解構(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張文萃(1985)。阿猴寮女兵傳。台北:韜略。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳宜倩(2002)。男性支持女性主義。當代公法新論(下)。台北:元照出版。  延伸查詢new window
3.Balkin, J. M.、Siegel, R. B.(2003)。The American civil rights tradition: Anticlassification or antisubordination? The origins and fate of antisubordination theory (Symposium)。Issues in Legal Scholarship, Article 11。  new window
4.Cohn, C.(2001)。Wars, wimps and women: Talking gender and thinking war。The gendered society reader。USA:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Janofsky, M.(2000803)。Top air force officer warns academy officials。N.T. Times。  new window
6.Levit, N.(1998)。The gender line: Men, women and the law。New York::New York University Press。  new window
7.Morgan, D. C.(1999)。Anti-subordination analysis after United States v. Virginia: Evaluating the constitutionality of K-1 single-sex public schools。The University of Chicago Legal Forum。  new window
8.Koetz, Hein、Zweigert, Konrad(1998)。An Introduction to Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press:Clarendon。  new window
9.郭玲惠(1999)。男女工作平等:法理與判決之研究。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Elisabetta, A.、Valena, E.、Russo, E.、Lorenza, S.、沈明室、洪陸訓(1998)。女性軍人的形象與現實。台北:政戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
11.顧燕翎(20000000)。女性主義理論與流派。臺北市:女書文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李建良、簡資修(2000)。憲法解釋之理論與實務(第二輯)。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
13.楊連仲、Harrell, M. C.、Laura, Miller L.(1999)。女性軍人的新契機:對戰備、團結與士氣的影響。台北:國防部史政編譯局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王芝剛(19980616)。陸官花木蘭柔中帶剛不讓鬚眉。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳詠航,黃敬平,李菁豪(20070531)。西點生性醜聞,陸官連坐,牽線學生記二大過二小過。立委譏:台軍官變「三七仔」,http://www.gsrat.net/news/newsclipDetail.php?ncdata_id=4121, 20090302。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂昭隆(19981108)。「給我們任戰鬥職的機會」,江麗君,體力戰技不輸人,運輸官上級派職非所願。  延伸查詢new window
4.張澄煇(20070222)。生前告白:謠言毀名節、申訴都碰壁。  延伸查詢new window
5.許正雄(19990730)。黃慧芬,第一位海軍女蛟龍、也是水中爆破大隊首位女隊員完成山、傘訓後,將是海陸空三棲女戰士。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉文俊(20000723)。雷家佳讓賢,張穎華母親致電感謝,http://www.ettoday.com/2003/07/23/326-1487159.htm, 20090302。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bundeswehr(2003)。Frauen in der Bundeswehr. Hintergrund und Diskussion,http:///www.bundeswehr.de/ie/forces/hintergrund/struk_hg_frauen_disk.php, 20080823。  new window
8.Jacinto, L.(20030114)。Girl power: Women join the boys in combat, but not without a fight,http://www.realnews .com/girl_power.htm, 2000414。  new window
9.National Women(2001)。Be all that we can be: Lessons from the military for improving our nation’s child care system, the national women’s law centers report,http://www.nwlc.org/details.cfm?id= §ion=childcare, 2000325。  new window
10.Ross, C.(20100215)。Home fires: Women'€™s Work,http://opinionator.blog.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/womens-work/。  new window
圖書論文
1.林明鏘(1996)。德國公務員之兩性工作平等制度--兼論我國公務員兩性平等政策及其執行。歐美兩性工作平等制度之比較研究。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.虞立莉(2003)。美伊戰爭中的美國女性軍人。美伊戰爭研究專輯之二。台北:政治作戰學校軍社中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃昭元(2005)。純男性軍校與性別歧視:評United States v. Virginia 一案判決。美國最高法院重要判決之研究:一九九六∼一九九九。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.雷文玫(2000)。性別平等的違憲審查:從美國女性主義法學看我國大法官幾則有關男女實質平等的解釋。憲法解釋之理論與實務。台北:中研院人文社會科學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE