:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:資訊社會的解構實踐--Derrida、Foucault和Baudrillard的觀點
書刊名:資訊社會研究
作者:劉平君 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Ping-chun
出版日期:2011
卷期:20
頁次:頁83-108
主題關鍵詞:德希達傅科布希亞權力解構資訊社會DerridaFoucaultBaudrillardDeconstructionPowerInformation society
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:40
  • 點閱點閱:137
本文結合Derrida的延異概念與Foucault的權力觀,並以Baudrillard所描繪的現代到後現代圖像為例來看資訊社會的解構實踐。 本文認為資訊社會的訊息川流中呈現著由權力主體/客體 (媒體或大眾) 所執行,以指涉真實的符號差異來生產意義 (權力) 的結構差異化過程。此活躍的權力鬥爭和權力流動不是權力的解放,而是總體性權力管治的 (再) 生產。 資訊社會的符號天空也展示著由空白主體 (大眾) 所操作,依感覺美學的符號延異來空洞化意義 (真實/權力) 的解構現象。此純粹差異的延異遊戲才是解放權力的解構實踐,且其並非無機的資訊機器所架構之冷冰冰的生化世界,而是空白主體依感覺來延展符號並綻放出感動與歡愉的活生生世界。
This article elaborates on the practice of deconstruction in information society with Derrida’s discussion of differance, Foucault's notion of power, and Baudrillard’s analysis of image as it evolves from the modern to the postmodern society. It argues that the message flow in information society presents the differentiated operation of meaning(and power) structure. This structure is (re)produced with the consistent claiming of reality carried out by social subject. Nevertheless, the active struggle and dynamics is not equivalent with the emancipation of the social subject from the subjection of power. In effect, it (re)produces the relationship of powerful government. This article argues that the information society is characteristic of the phenomenon of deconstruction, in which meaning (and power) is emptied out in order to declare reality is impossible. Therefore, deconstruction is a game of affirming emptiness. Its play with “the symbol” for the purpose of being meaninglessness constitutes its tactics to undo power in information society.
期刊論文
1.唐士哲(20050700)。在速度的廢墟中挺進:電子媒介新聞的唯物批判觀點。新聞學研究,84,79-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝清俊(19920900)。資訊社會與倫理。新聞學研究,46,1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Derrida, Jacques、Allison, David B.(1973)。Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs。Evanston, IL:Northwestern UP。  new window
2.Storey, J.(2001)。Culture theory and popular culture: An introduction。New York:Prentice Hall。  new window
3.Deleuze, G.(1998)。Foucault。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
4.Sim, Stuart(1999)。Derrida and the End of History。Cambridge, UK:Icon Books。  new window
5.詹乃璇、周汶昊(2002)。布希亞與千禧年。臺北:果實。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lyotard, Jean-Francois(1971)。Discourse, figure。Paris:Klincksieck。  new window
7.Derrida, J.、Bass, A.(1981)。Position。London:The Athlone Press。  new window
8.Jordan, Tim、江靜之(2003)。網際網路的衝擊--網際空間與網際網路的文化與政治。臺北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
9.Baudrillard, Jean、Glaser, Sheila Faria(1994)。Simulacra and Simulation。Michigan。  new window
10.Foucault, Michel(1980)。Power and Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977。New York:Pantheon。  new window
11.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian、Jameson, Fredric(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
12.Derrida, Jacques、Bass, Alan(1978)。Writing and Difference。London:Routledge。  new window
13.蔡錚雲(2006)。另類哲學:現代社會的後現代文化。台北:邊城出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Derrida, Jacques、Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty(1976)。Of Grammatology。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
15.Hall, Stuart(1997)。Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices。SAGE Publication Ltd.。  new window
16.Baudrillard, Jean、Foss, Paul、Patton, Paul、Johnston, John(1983)。In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities, or the End of the Social。Semiotext(e)。  new window
17.Baudrillard, Jean、Grant, Iain Hamilton(1993)。Symbolic Exchange and Death。London:Sage Publications。  new window
18.何乏筆、Gros, F.(2006)。傅科考。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.Anderson, N. A.(2003)。Discursive analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Kosellek, Laclau, Luhmann。UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Foucault, M.(1983)。Afterword by Michel Foucault: the subject and power。Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE