:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:街頭「飆」舞的晚期現代性意涵--我尬舞,故我在
書刊名:運動文化研究
作者:盧玉珍 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Yuh-jen
出版日期:2011
卷期:17
頁次:頁7-56
主題關鍵詞:嘻哈街舞準市民社會流動現代性當下世界顛倒看Hip-hop danceQuasi-civil societyLiquid modernityCarpe diemInverted bodily spectacles
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:140
本文旨在探討以「飆舞」為名的街舞賽會,及現代性在臺灣所驅動的翻轉流變。「飆舞」一詞是在1995年後,成為臺灣流行的口頭禪,它與臺灣社會的開放及嘻哈的落地生根相關,嘻哈街舞因此被視為一種尋找社群連帶感的跨國文化行動。研究問題包括:透過飆舞現象,現代性在臺灣所彰顯的特殊性是什麼?在全球化驅動下,臺灣街舞團體如何立足於嘻哈文化的在地脈絡中?而這個跨國文化行動又如何被在地議題所挪用及轉譯?在晚期資本主義商業機制下,賽會又如何操演街舞的流行?研究顯示,臺灣社會對主體性與認同的追求,亟需一個圖像作為其信念的基礎。嘻哈「做自己」的青少年跨文化圭臬及「世界顛倒看」的反權威意象,遂被挪用為政治對抗氛圍的代言。流動現代性在臺灣的特殊情境中,於是結合了文化面與政治面,共構了特有的嗆聲文化。而在全球化連動下,飆舞凝聚了一個13-25歲的次文化準市民社會,透過「認知地圖」的嬉遊方式立足於在地脈絡中。這個以街舞展演現代性自我的階層,是以「身體玩音樂」學習成為男子漢,並以「世界顛倒看」的舞蹈方式,構成一種綜攝性慾、潛能、力量的公共奇觀。賽會乃利用「當下」所撩撥的”WOW”能量,構連奇觀的群眾魅力,透過異業結盟而操作「迷文化」的全球流行。
This essay explores Hip-Hop dance practice in Taiwan as a quasi-civil society of subculture as well as an act of community consciousness from the bottom up. Practiced mostly by high school and college youth, this type of dance is commonly labeled as ”biao-wu,” an untranslatable term that combines velocity, violence, and dancing pleasure originated from Taipei City government-held block parties in 1995. Since then, biao-wu, linking street dance, rap music, and graffiti with advertisements, has served multiple purposes, including health education, party politics, dance battles and commercial marketing. Given that Pop culture's edge is often shifting, what makes Hip-Hop dance sui generis in Taiwan is that dance competitions often regulate ”biao-wu” hip-hoppers' nomadic life-style in which a cognitive map is formulated to trace the progression of dancing techniques, and a social text is constructed through their carpe diem engagements in search of a physical culture that appears as community solidarity. Ultimately, Breaking's inverted bodily spectacles have been appropriated by polities to represent an antagonistic political atmosphere, while the young hip-hoppers simply want to be themselves in terms that I battle, therefore I am. As such, a unique confronting culture emerges from ”liquid modernity” along with consumer cultures and politics in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.鄭天明、曹又心、李佳豪(20071000)。成本在活動精熟度與持久利益之關係研究--以街舞休閒活動為例。藝術學報,81,227-247。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Foucault, Michel、吳宗寶(19920800)。論康德的「何謂啟蒙」。當代,76,22-31。  延伸查詢new window
3.石元康(19900300)。個殊性原則與現代性:黑格爾論市民社會。當代,47,20-28。  延伸查詢new window
4.李永熾(19900300)。市民社會與國家。當代,47,29-38。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊凱麟(20080900)。分裂分析傅柯(4):界限存有論與邊界--事件系譜學。中外文學,37(3)=422,45-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Mauss, Marcel、Brewster, Ben(1973)。Techniques of the Body。Economy and Society,2(1),70-88。  new window
7.黎聖峰(1995)。這場面是青少年最想要的。聯合報,版11。  延伸查詢new window
8.(2008)。街舞3名師‧碩博士竹科工程師。自由時報。  延伸查詢new window
9.林柏勳、張金鶚(2002)。街舞! 對抗? 中正紀念堂: 人、活動與公共空間之探討。都市與計畫,115-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李靜怡(2005)。台灣青少年嘻哈文化的認同與實踐(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lu, Yuh-jen(2002)。Wrestling with the Angels: Choreographing Chinese Diaspora in the United States, 1930s-1990a,New York。  new window
圖書
1.Giddens, Anthony(1990)。The Consequence of Modernity。Polity Press。  new window
2.George, Nelson、何穎怡、蕭秀琴(2002)。嘻哈美國。臺北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
3.迪克‧何柏第、蔡宜剛(2006)。次文化--風格的意義。臺北:巨流圖書公司印行。  延伸查詢new window
4.Martin, John(1972)。The Modern Dance。New York:Dance Horizons。  new window
5.陳學明(2003)。文化工業。臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Alexander, Victoria D.、張正霖、陳巨擘(2006)。藝術社會學:精緻與通俗形式之探索。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊孟瑜(1998)。飆舞:林懷民與雲門傳奇。台北:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
8.Garcia-Canclini, Nestor(1995)。Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity。Minneapolis, MN:the University of Minnesota Press。  new window
9.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Bauman, Zygmunt、歐陽景根(2002)。流動的現代性。上海:上海三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.Călinescu, Matei(1987)。Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
12.Bauman, Zygmunt(2000)。Liquid Modernity。Polity Press:Blackwell。  new window
13.Anderson, Benedict(1991)。Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism。Verso。  new window
14.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet、徐宗國(1997)。質性研究概論。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.林益民、莊育麟(2003)。青少年街頭文化素描街舞與同人誌。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Jenkins, Henry、蕭可斑(2007)。Wow效應: 流行文化如何抓得住你。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.Rofel, Lisa、黃新(1999)。另類的現代性: 改革開放時代中國性別化的渴望。南京。  延伸查詢new window
18.Rose, Tricia(1944)。Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America。Middletown, Connecticut。  new window
19.Laban, Rudolf von(1974)。The Language of Movement。Boston。  new window
20.Banes, Sally(1993)。Democracy's Body: Judson Dance Theater, 1962-1964。Durham ; London。  new window
21.卡維波(2004)。「減肥瘦身」的女性主義標準答案錯在哪裡? 從「飲食消費的現代化」到「性感美貌的多元與普及」。身體政治與媒體批判。中壢。  延伸查詢new window
22.Taylor, Charles、林信安(2001)。市民社會與大眾文化。回顧現代文化想像。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.Mauss, Marcel、林宗錦(2008)。身體技術。人類學與社會學五講。桂林。  延伸查詢new window
24.Hills, Matt、朱華瑄(2005)。序言。Fan Culture。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.盧玉珍(2004)。拉邦動作分析。舞蹈辭典。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
26.盧玉珍(1998)。拉邦動作分析介紹。國際舞蹈理論技巧研習營報告書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
27.Adorno, Theodor、Horkheimer, Max(1999)。The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception。The Culture Studies Reader。New York。  new window
28.Banes, Sally(2004)。Breaking。That's the Joint! The Hip Hop Studies Reader。New York。  new window
29.Kant, Immanuel(1959)。What Is Enlightenment?。Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What Is Enlightenment。New York。  new window
30.Morelli, Sarah(2011)。Who Is a Dancing Hero? Rap, Hip-Hop, and Dance in Korean Popular Culture。Rap and Hip-Hop outside the USA。Middletown, Connecticut。  new window
31.Duncan, Isadora(1969)。I See America Dancing。Isadora Duncan: The Art of the Dance。New York。  new window
32.Forman, Murray(2004)。'Represent': Race, Space, and Place in Rap Music。That's the Joint! The Hip-Hop Studies Reader。New York。  new window
33.Siegel, Marcia B.(2010)。Using Lexicons for Performance Research: Three Duets。New Approaches to Theatre Studies and Performance Analysis。New York。  new window
34.Condry, Ian(2001)。A History of Japanese Hip Hop: Street Dance, Club's Scene, Pop Market。Global Noise: Rap and Hip Hop outside the USA。Middletown, Connecticut。  new window
35.Gilroy, Paul(2003)。The Black Atlantic as a Counterculture of Modernity。Theorizing Diaspora: A Reader, Keyworks in Cultural Studies。Malden, MA。  new window
36.Hazzard-Donald, Katrina(2004)。Dance in Hip-Hop Culture。That's the Joint! The Hip-Hop Studies Reader。New York。  new window
其他
1.陳文獻(1996)。青春不留白『舞』夜狂飆—員林青商會主辦的慶祝青年節街頭,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.牛慶福,董智森(1995)。總統府前飆舞, 在野議員不以為然。  延伸查詢new window
3.伊蓮(2004)。不是「偶像崇拜」,是「迷文化」。  延伸查詢new window
4.江妙瑩(1995)。我們在這裡飆舞: 參加者的看法。  延伸查詢new window
5.江妙瑩(1995)。專家學者對總統府廣場解嚴看法。  延伸查詢new window
6.陶福媛(2008)。紐約倫敦各一起‧穿垮褲秀內褲被控猥褻。  延伸查詢new window
7.許司任(1995)。臺北飆舞風吹到彰化週六晚上旭光路「舞出咱的一片天」。  延伸查詢new window
8.郭乃日(1995)。舉辦飆舞 酷? 三黨代表 辯。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳宜君(2007)。韓流新品‧B-Boys街舞尬世界: 國際比賽表現不俗‧南韓政府全力扶植‧嘻哈+傳統打擊樂‧改造舶來品‧就要觀光客「照過來」!。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳春木,林日熙(1985)。街頭作畫‧盡情跳舞‧西門鬧區‧生氣蓬勃。  延伸查詢new window
11.(1995)。阻路飆舞, 市民看法兩極: 議員公布民意調查, 贊成與反對者比例相當。  延伸查詢new window
12.(1998)。羅東青年節很環保明慶祝活東捐贈回收、義賣舊衣物所得建立心靈環保。  延伸查詢new window
13.(2009)。深陷「嗆聲」泥淖裡的台灣民主。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳志華(1993)。舞壇爭霸比創意。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳榮裕(1995)。郭為藩: 反對飆舞、師生戀及直接處罰。  延伸查詢new window
16.江昭青(1995)。交大百年壽辰‧熱力四射: 兩岸五校同步慶生‧七日晚飆舞暖場。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊金嚴(1995)。馬路上飆舞‧陳水扁要大人體諒。  延伸查詢new window
18.何穎怡(1995)。迴帶機: 和文化評論工作者林谷芳一起接受專訪。  延伸查詢new window
19.周春來(1995)。飆舞學日本定期舉辦。  延伸查詢new window
20.林安寧(1995)。舞會現場群眾反應。  延伸查詢new window
21.盧健英(1995)。一九九五年, 臺灣的文化很政治。  延伸查詢new window
22.林淑玲(1995)。新聞幕後活動搞得轟轟烈烈‧不必花錢還可倒賺‧市民辦晚會名利。  延伸查詢new window
23.南方朔(2004)。另一種專業: 商業遊戲--全球流行的嘻哈產業。  延伸查詢new window
24.張自強(1992)。打歌秀‧唱開知名度。  延伸查詢new window
25.賴珮如(2002)。街舞大賽‧高中生舞力對決。  延伸查詢new window
26.Foucault, Michel,李康。什麼是啟蒙?,http://westofsun.blog.163.com/blog/static/2091925200681304758387, 20090329。  new window
27.趙敏鳳(1997)。舞林英雄帖, 有請青少年。  延伸查詢new window
28.鄭念琪(1995)。飆舞‧讓青少年共享路權。  延伸查詢new window
29.吳翠珍。媒體教育與流行文化,http://www.fubon.org/Uploads/{4401FB5F-2D2F-48A2-885F-E4B52190348F}_%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94see%20see%E7%9C%8BNO.14dov, 20060125。  new window
圖書論文
1.Jameson, Fredric(1988)。Cognitive Mapping。Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture。Urbana:University of Illinois Press。  new window
2.Habermas, Jürgen(1983)。Modernity: an Incomplete Project。The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture。Bay Press。  new window
3.Foucault, M.(1997)。What is enlightenment?。Ethics: subjectivity and truth。NY:The New Press。  new window
4.Nixon, Sean(1997)。Exhibiting masculinity。Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE