:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從PISA 2009建構反應題剖析臺灣學生的閱讀問題
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:鄒慧英 引用關係黃秀霜 引用關係陳昌明 引用關係
作者(外文):Tzou, HueyingHuang, Hsiu-shuangChen, C. M.
出版日期:2011
卷期:14:4
頁次:頁25-48
主題關鍵詞:國際學生能力評量計畫建構反應題閱讀素養PISAConstructed-response itemReading literacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:202
國際學生能力評量計畫PISA 2009調查報告出爐,臺灣2009的表現與2006相去不遠,為進一步深思與探究臺灣學生的閱讀評量表現,本文以文本分析法剖析臺灣學生於PISA 2009閱讀評量建構反應題可能隱含的閱讀問題。本研究以臺灣學生於PISA 2009閱讀評量標準版範例試題中的三道建構反應題之作答文本進行分析討論,結果發現臺灣低表現水準學生的問題有四:(1)使用注音符號、錯別字或語句不通順;(2)未作答的比例偏高;(3)無法掌握題目關鍵,所寫答案與題目要求不符;(4)忽略應依據文本作答。
As it is evident from the results of the Program for International Students Assessment (PISA) 2009, the average performances of Taiwan students were not much different between the PISA 2006 and PISA 2009 survey cycles. In order to have a deep understanding of Taiwan students' performance on the reading assessment, the current study uses textual analysis for the constructed response items to explore students' potential reading problems. Three constructed-response items released in the PISA 2009 results are used for the analyses and discussion. The study concludes that low performers in Taiwan have the following characteristics. They tend to use phonetic symbols rather than Chinese characters. Misuses of words and/or grammar are often seen in their responses. The nonresponse rate is relatively high, and if there are valid responses, they do not correspond to the questions appropriately, which implies that students are not able to handle what has been measured. Sometimes, students even ignore the prompts and give their answers which are either not related to the prompts provided or not tied to the questions being asked.
期刊論文
1.何琦瑜(20070906)。從閱讀到寫作--中小學現況大調查。天下雜誌,138-151。  延伸查詢new window
2.Perin, D.、Hare, R.(2010)。A contextualized reading-writing intervention for community college students。Community College Research Center (CCRC) Brief,44,1-4。  new window
3.Wu, M. L.、Les, M.(2008)。The difference between boys and girls。EQ,Summer 2008,35-36。  new window
4.柯華葳(20070906)。促進國際閱讀素養研究(PIRLS)最新發現--臺灣需要更多「閱讀策略」教學。天下雜誌,2007,152-158。  延伸查詢new window
5.Pajares, Frank、Valiante, Giovanni(1999)。Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students。Contemporary Educational Psychology,24(4),390-405。  new window
6.Pajares, F.(2003)。Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature。Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,19,139-158。  new window
會議論文
1.Mendelovits, J.、Searle, D.(2009)。PISA for teachers: Interpreting and using information from an international reading assessment in the classroom。Paper presented at ACER Research Conference 2009, Assessment and Student Learning: Collecting, interpreting and using data to inform teaching。Perth, Australia。  new window
圖書
1.Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy(2010)。Time to act: An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success。New York, NY:Carnegie Corporation of New York。  new window
2.Carley, K.(1993)。Coding Choices for Textual Analysis: A Comparison of Content Analysis and Map Analysis。Sociological Methodology。Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishing。  new window
3.Graham, S.、Hebert, M. A.(2010)。Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report。Washington, DC:Alliance for Excellent Education。  new window
4.OECD(2010)。PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science。OECD Publishing。  new window
其他
1.OECD(2010b)。PISA 2009 Results: Student engagement, strategies and practices,http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264083943-en。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top