:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教育行動研究的困境與挑戰
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:潘世尊 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Shih-tsun
出版日期:2014
卷期:30
頁次:頁119-147
主題關鍵詞:行動研究教育知識教育實務Action researchEducational knowledgeEducational practice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:2046
  • 點閱點閱:159
行動研究,乃教育實務工作者解決實務上的問題與發展教育知識之有效途徑。在台灣,近十幾年來,行動研究已被許多教育實務工作者所採用,惟依筆者的經驗與見聞,它的進行與發展也面臨一些困境和挑戰。首先,教育實務/學術工作者在進行或評估行動研究時,常受量或質的研究傳統所不當支配。其次,台灣的學校制度與組織文化,難以促使教師主動深入探究教育實務上的問題;華人傳統文化與教師慣有之工具與技術導向的思維模式,又影響行動研究的實施成效。最後,台灣教育學術社群近年較少呼應國際潮流創新行動研究之內涵;同時,也少見研究者針對台灣社會文化傳統及學校制度與教師特質,論述行動研究的實施與推動之問題和解決方案。本文針對這些困境與挑戰加以反思,並提出可能的因應與突破之道。
Action research is a useful approach for educational practitioners to solve practical problems and develop educational knowledge. It has been implemented by a number of educational practitioners over the past 10 years in Taiwan. However, several predicaments and challenges exist in its implementation and development according to the author's experiences and visions. First, educational practitioners/academic researchers predominantly use quantitative and qualitative traditions of methodology when they implement or evaluate action research. Next, the system and organizational culture of Taiwan's schools do not facilitate teachers to actively and deeply examine the problems in their educational practices. Moreover, traditional cultures of Chinese and the orientation of instrumental and technical thinking generally employed by Taiwan's teachers negatively affect action research. Finally, it is extremely rare for educational researchers to respond to an international trend and innovate the contents of action research in these past years. In addition, for the implementation and promotion of action research in Taiwan, few researchers attempt to argue the problems and the strategies that could solve them based on Taiwan's social and cultural traditions and teachers' traits. This paper focused on examining these predicaments and challenges, and proposing potential approaches for breakthrough.
期刊論文
1.高博銓(20090600)。教師行動研究的問題與展望。中等教育,60(2),32-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.鄒慧英、黃秀霜、陳昌明(20111000)。從PISA 2009建構反應題剖析臺灣學生的閱讀問題。課程與教學,14(4),25-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.沈碩彬(20081000)。臺灣中小學行動研究論文評析。研習資訊,25(5),81-88。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃麗蓉、賴思儀、楊淑晴(20111200)。中學生的歷史概念、歷史學習態度與歷史批判思考傾向。教育實踐與研究,24(2),65-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.曾慶豹(20100600)。批判理論的效果歷史--法蘭克福學派在臺灣的接受史。哲學與文化,37(6)=433,111-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.歐用生(20120000)。教師的課程理論化:從詩性智慧到A/r/t。Education Journal,40(1/2),15-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.王嘉陵(20040100)。行動研究--課程改革的「解藥」或「安慰劑」?。課程與教學,7(1),139-151+185。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.周淑卿(20120000)。課程美學研究在臺灣:議題與問題。Education Journal,40(1/2),31-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.翁福元、林松柏(20051200)。行動研究運用於教師專業發展初探--中部縣市某高中教師從事行動研究為例。教育科學期刊,5(2),78-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.葉興華(20011100)。臺北市國小推展行動研究之探究--從「臺北市第一屆教育行動研究成果發表會論文集」分析。臺北市立師範學院學報,32,211-236。  延伸查詢new window
11.謝寶梅(2003)。台灣教師參與行動研究之趨勢與評析。教育資料集刊,28,389-405。  延伸查詢new window
12.Marshall, P.、Willson, P.、de Salas, K.、McKay, J.(2010)。Action research in practice: Issues and challenges in a financial services case study。The Qualitative Report,15(1),76-93。  new window
13.Terry, B.(2011)。Breakthroughs in action research through poetry。Educational Action Research,19(1),5-21。  new window
14.Threlfall, S. J.(2013)。Poetry in action research: An innovative means to a reflective learner in higher education。Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives,14(3),360-367。  new window
15.Winter, R.(2002)。Truth or fiction: Problems of validity and authenticity in narratives of action research。Educational Action Research,10(1),143-154。  new window
16.范文芳(20010100)。改進語文教學培養思辨能力。語文學報,7,93-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.潘世尊(20081100)。王財貴的兒童讀經教育理論之析評。弘光人文社會學報,9,55-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Berk, L. E.、Winsler, A.(1995)。Scaffolding children''s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education。School Psychology International,19(2),189-191。  new window
19.楊深坑(19981200)。教育知識的國際化或本土化?--兼論臺灣近年來的教育研究。Education Journal,26(2)/27(1),361-381。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Carr, W.(1987)。What is an Educational Practice?。Journal of Philosophy of Education,21(2),163-175。  new window
21.劉祐彰(20071200)。中小學教師進行課程行動研究的困境與省思。中等教育,58(6),22-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.林佩璇(20091200)。課程行動研究的實踐論述:從自我到社會文化。教育實踐與研究,22(2),95-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.簡成熙(20021200)。本土教育理論之建構:教育哲學工作者的反省。教育科學期刊,2(2),36-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Carr, W.、Kemmis, S.(2005)。Staying critical。Educational Action Research,13(3),347-357。  new window
25.Elliott, John(1987)。Educational theory, practical philosophy and action research。British Journal of Educational Studies,35(2),149-169。  new window
26.但昭偉(19951200)。教育研究的三部曲及其可能的謬誤。初等教育學刊,4,249-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.彭泗清(19931200)。中國人「做人」的概念分析。本土心理學研究,2,297-313。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.林昱貞(20021200)。批判教育學在臺灣:發展與困境。教育研究集刊,48(4),1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Elliott, John(2007)。Assessing the quality of action research。Research Papers in Education,22(2),229-246。  new window
30.Carr, W.(2006)。Philosophy, methodology and action research。Journal of Philosophy of Education,40(4),421-435。  new window
研究報告
1.陳惠邦、李麗霞(1999)。行行重行行 : 師院語文科教材教法中國小低年級寫作教學之探究。新竹市:國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林淑女(2011)。臺北市教師行動研究之批判論述分析(博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃鴻博(1998)。在國民小學實施STS教育之合作行動研究(博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.謝昭賢(2000)。以合作行動研究發展STS教師專業能力(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.李惠琪(2001)。國小教師從事「教育行動研究」之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Zuber-Sherritt, O.(1996)。New Directions in Action Research。London, UK:The Falmer Press。  new window
2.Elliott, P. W.(2012)。Participatory action research: Challenges, complications, and opportunities。Saskatoon, SK:Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan。  new window
3.Piaget, Jean、Cook, M.(1954)。The Construction of Reality in the Child。New York:Basic Books。  new window
4.Elliott, J.(1991)。Action research for education change。Open University Press。  new window
5.潘世尊(2007)。教育、理論與行動研究。臺北:華騰文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Habermas, J.、McCarthy, T.(1984)。The Theory of Communicative Action。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
7.Foucault, M.、尙衡(1998)。性意識史:第一卷導論。臺北市:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
8.潘世尊(2005)。教育行動研究:理論、實踐與反省。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Carr, W.(1995)。For education: Towards critical educational inquiry。Buckingham。  new window
10.Lyotard, Jean-François、Bennington, Geoff、Massumi, Brian、Jameson, Fredric(1984)。The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
11.Argyris, Chris、Schön, Donald A.(1974)。Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness。Jossey-Bass。  new window
12.王文科(1990)。教育研究法。五南圖書出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
14.陳惠邦(1998)。教育行動研究。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
15.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
16.Carr, Wilfred、Kemmis, Stephen(1986)。Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research。Falmer Press。  new window
17.Aristotle、Crisp, Roger(2000)。Nicomachean Ethics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
18.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
19.LeCompte, Margaret Diane、Goetz, Judith Preissle(1984)。Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research。Academic Press。  new window
20.Brown, T.、Jones, L.(2001)。Action research and postmodernism: congruence and critique。Philadelphia:Open University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.蕭昭君(2004)。國內教育行動研究解放了什麼?一個師資培育者的閱讀與困惑。教育研究方法論:觀點與方法。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Stenhouse, L.(1988)。Case study methods。Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook。Oxford:Pergamon。  new window
3.Kemmis, S.(2001)。Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas。Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice。London:Sage Publications。  new window
4.張世平(1991)。行動研究法。教育研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kemmis, S.(1988)。Action research。Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook。Oxford:Pergamon Press。  new window
6.Kemmis, S.(1996)。Emancipatory aspirations in a postmodern Era。New directions in action research。The Falmer Press。  new window
7.Hirst, P. H.(1973)。The nature and scope of educational theory--Reply to D. J. O'Connor。New essays in the philosophy of education。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
8.黃光國(1988)。人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。中國人的心理。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hirst, P. H.(1983)。Educational theory。Educational theory and its foundation disciplines。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
10.楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理--理念與方法篇。台北:桂冠圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.O'Connor, D. J.(1973)。The Nature and Scope of Educational Theory。New Essays in the Philosophy of Education。London, UK:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE