臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：交通案例與廢棄物清理案例之量刑因素資訊整合實驗：以犯後態度與犯罪所生之損害為例
書刊名：管理學報
作者：張寧 引用關係／汪明生 引用關係／黃國忠
作者(外文)：Chang, Ning／Wang, Ming-shen／Huang, Kuo-chung
出版日期：2011
卷期：28:6
頁次：頁565-577
主題關鍵詞：司法改革；量刑；資訊整合理論；Judicial reform；Sentencing；Information integration theory；IIT
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:63
本研究將法官的量刑行為視為一種決策，以探討法庭中的各種角色就量刑因素的結合模式與量刑的刑度是否存有差異。研究方法主要採用資訊整合理論（Information Integration Theory, IIT）的實驗方法（Anderson, 1981, 1982），將受測者分為法官、檢察官、律師、受刑人、一般民眾等五種角色，選定高雄、台南、屏東等地區之受測者，分別接受「交通事故」與「廢棄物清理」兩種案例施測，以獲取「犯罪所生之損害」及「犯罪後之態度」兩項量刑因素的資訊結合模式。研究發現如下：一、五種角色的各別的受測者較多使用「等權重平均模式」結合犯罪所生之損害及犯罪後之態度兩項量刑因素。二、案例類型對刑度產生影響，且廢棄物清理案例明顯重於交通案例。三、角色不同在交通事故案例之量刑無顯著差異；但在廢棄物清理案例，則有顯著差異，且主要集中在一般民眾與其他角色之間。四、在進行司法改革10年之後，法官等利害關係人對量刑因素之認知已略顯不同。
This study regards the sentences from the judge as a decision-making to discuss whether is any difference in the integration models of sentencing factors and seriousness among the roles in the court. The research adopts the experimental methods of Information Integration Theory (IIT), and divides the subjects into five roles: judges, prosecutors, lawyers, inmates and the general public. The subject were drawn from Kaohsiung, Tainan and Pingtung areas in Taiwan and tested in the cases of "traffic accidents" and "waste disposal". Through the experiments, the study acquired the integration modes of "the damage from crimes" and "the attitudes after committing crimes" in the measurement of punishment.Here are the research findings: 1. Individual subject from the five roles mostly uses "equal weight averaging rule" to combine the two factors of "the damages from crimes" and "the attitudes after committing crimes." 2. The types of case have significant influence over sentences. The waste disposal are serious than the traffic cases. 3. There is no significant difference in penalty measurement in traffic accident cases among the five roles. However, there are significant variations in waste disposal cases, especially between the general public and the other roles. 4. Through a decade after the justice reform, there have been slight differences in cognitive models of sentences.
期刊論文
1.汪明生、張寧(19981200)。環境污染案例與交通過失案例之量刑因素結合模式。管理學報，15(4)，665-682。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.洪鴻智(20021200)。科技風險知覺與風險消費態度的決定--灰色訊息關聯分析之應用。都市與計劃，29(4)，575-593。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳運財、邱仁楹(2005)。最高法院撤銷發回更審原因之檢討。東海大學法學研究，22，151-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaplan, M. F.(1977)。Discussion Polarization Effects in a Modified Jury Decision Paradigm: Informational Influences。Sociometry，40(3)，262-271。  new window
5.Ostrom, T. M.、Werner, C.、Saks, M. J.(1978)。An Integration Theory Analysis of Jurors' Presumptions of Guilt or Innocence。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，36(4)，436-450。  new window
6.Troutman, C. M.、Shanteau, J.(1976)。Do Consumers Evaluate Product by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information。Journal of Consumer Research，3(2)，101-106。  new window
7.Weld, H. P.、Danzig, E. R.(1940)。A Study of the Way in Which a Verdict Is Reached by a Jury。American Journal of Psychology，53(2)，518-536。  new window
8.Weld, H. P.、Roff, M.(1938)。A Study in the Formation of Opinion Based upon Legal Evidence。American Journal of Psychology，51(4)，609-628。  new window
9.Anderson, N. H.(1959)。Test of Model for Opinion Change。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology，59(1)，371-381。  new window
10.Bower, G. H.(1978)。Experiments on Story Comprehension and Recall。Discourse Processes，1(1)，211-232。  new window
11.郭棋湧(2001)。司法院89年度研究發展項目研究報告--交通過失犯量刑之研究。司法研究年報，21，252-253。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.許金釵(2006)。美國聯邦量刑準據之研究--兼論我國建立量刑準據之可行性。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳碧珍(2006)。群體共識判斷中社會影響網絡之研究--資訊整合理論之應用(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王兆鵬、林定香、楊文山(2003)。揭開法官量刑心證的黑盒子：司法統計實證研究。台北：台北律師公會 ; 民間司法改革基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡墩銘(1991)。審判心理學。臺北市：水牛圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Anderson, N. H.(1982)。Methods of Information Integration Theory。New York, NY：Academic Press。  new window
4.Anderson, N. H.(1996)。A Functional Theory of cognition。Hillsdale, New Jersey：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Anderson, N. H.(2001)。Empirical Direction in Design and Analysis。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Hammond, Kenneth R.、McClelland, Gary H.、Mumpower, Jeryl(1980)。Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and Procedures。Praeger Publishers。  new window
7.Anderson, Norman Henry(1981)。Foundations of information integration theory。Academic Press。  new window
8.羅大華(2002)。刑事司法心理學理論與霣踐。北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.Brehmer, B.、Joyce, C. R. B.(1988)。Human Judgment: The SIT View。Amsterdam。  new window
10.Hammond, K. R.(1966)。The Psychology of Egon Brunswick。New York。  new window
11.Posner, M. I.(1989)。Foundations of Cognitive Science。Cambridge。  new window
12.Wigmore, J. H.(1937)。The Science of Judicial Proof, as Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials。Boston：Little, Brown Book Group。  new window
13.Wrightsman, Lawrence S.(2000)。Forensic Psychology, Belmont。Scotland。  new window
14.Kaplan, M. F.(1975)。Informational Integration in Social Judgment: Ineraction of Judge and Informational Components。Human Judgment and Decision Processes。New York。  new window
15.Hastie, R.(1986)。A Primer of Information-Processing Theory for the Political Scientist。Political Cognition。New Jersey。  new window
其他
1.Shanteau, J. C.(1984)。Functional Measurement Number One: Manual for Program FM#1，Manhattan。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hammer, T.(2003)。Introduction。Youth unemployment and social exclusion in Europe: A comparative study。UK：The policy press。  new window
2.Hastie, R.(1993)。Algebraic models of juror decision making。Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hammond, Kenneth R.、Stewart, Thomas R.、Brehmer, Berndt、Steinmann, Derick O.(1975)。Social Judgment Theory。Human Judgment and Decision Processes。Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1451（臺灣：1433，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67469984
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上