:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:倫理規範的發展與公共性反思:以美國及臺灣人類學為例
書刊名:文化研究
作者:劉紹華 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Shao-hua
出版日期:2012
卷期:14
頁次:頁197-228
主題關鍵詞:倫理規範倫理審查公共人類學臺灣人類學美國人類學Code of ethicsEthical reviewPublic anthropologyTaiwan anthropologyAmerica anthropology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:47
本文以美國及台灣兩地人類學會倫理規範的發展過程為例,探討當前台灣的研究倫理討論中所呈現出的公共性問題。理解兩國人類學在發展過程中所面臨的特殊堅持,以及因而引發的倫理價值爭論與困境,有助於我們思考學術規範法制化所形塑的倫理意義與限制。在社會變遷的浪潮中,人類學的學科特性不斷提醒學者在面對倫理挑戰時,必須透過困惑、思索、掙扎,以謀求符合學科核心價值,但亦應參酌個人特殊情境與經驗的倫理決定。對於學科價值的論辯、對於非主流者的理解、以及對於多元文化的敏感性,是人類學倫理思考的根本。專業倫理規範應成為推動研究倫理的重心,並據此展開公共討論。
This article reveals the problem of publicness during the establishment of ethical oversight of human research in Taiwan. Through examining the development of anthropological codes of ethics in the United States and Taiwan, we come to understand the particular concerns of anthropology in these two societies, and that insight helps us reckon with the significance and constraints of institutionalizing research ethical oversight. Anthropology generally reminds scholars of their individual responsibility to grapple with ethical challenges in the context of cultural difference and social change. Constantly reflecting on the disciplinary cores, understanding the subaltern, and remaining sensitive to cultural difference constitute the fundamental ethical guidance of anthropology. Anthropological code of ethics should become the essence when making the discussion on research ethics public.
期刊論文
1.戴華、甘偵蓉、鄭育萍(20101200)。人文社會科學與研究倫理審查:執行研究倫理治理架構計畫的考察與反思。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(1),10-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.Boas, Franz(18961218)。The Limitations of the Comparative Method of Anthropology。Science,4(103),901-908。  new window
3.Geertz, Clifford(1984)。Anti Anti-Relativism。American Anthropologist,86(2),263-278。  new window
4.劉紹華、林文玲(2012)。應用人類學的倫理桃戰:美國經驗的啟發。華人應用人類學,1(1),117-135。  延伸查詢new window
5.Adams, Richard Newbold(1981)。Ethical Principles in Anthropological Research: One or Many?。Human Organization,40(2),155-160。  new window
6.American Anthropologist(1949)。Proceedings of the American Anthropological Association for the Year Ending December 1948。American Anthropologist,51(2),345-378。  new window
7.Beals, Ralph L.、Executive Board(1967)。Background Information on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics。American Anthropological Association Fellow Newsletter,8,1-13。  new window
8.Liu, Shao-hua(2010)。Anthropological Ethics in the Shadows: Researching Drug Use and AIDS Intervention in Southwest China。Asian Anthropology,9,77-94。  new window
9.Mead, Margaret(1969)。Research with Human Beings: A Model Derived from Anthropological Field Practice。Daedalus,98,361-386。  new window
10.Simon, Scott(2010)。Negotiating Power: Elections and the Constitution of Indigenous Taiwan。American Ethnologist,37(4),726-740。  new window
11.Society for Applied Anthropology(1949)。Code of Ethics of the Society for Applied Anthropology。Human Organization,8(2),20-21。  new window
會議論文
1.蘇碩斌(2009)。制度化的評鑑與評鑑化的制度:公私立大學社會系所教師的處境。2009年台灣社會學年會「全球效應與地方反映:社會學新興議題與挑戰」,東吳大學社會系主辦 (會議日期: 11月28日至29日)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉紹華(1994)。去殖民與主體重建--以原住民三份文化刊物為例探討歷史再現中的權力問題(碩士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.台灣人類學與民族學學會(2011)。台灣人類學與民族學學會倫理規範。  延伸查詢new window
2.Benedict, Ruth(1946)。The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture。Boston:Houghton Mifflin Co.。  new window
3.黃克武、潘彥蓉(2005)。李亦園先生訪問紀錄。臺北:中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brown, Melissa J.(2004)。Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities。University of California Press。  new window
5.Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn(2003)。Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for Ethically Conscious Practice。Walnut Creek, CA:AltaMira Press。  new window
6.Gwynne, Margaret Anderson(2003)。Applied Anthropology: A Career-Oriented Approach。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
7.Tierney, Patrick(2001)。Darkness in El Dorado: how Scientists and Journalists Devastated the Amazon。New York:Norton。  new window
其他
1.臺灣人類學與民族學學會(20111101)。對「研究倫理審查制度」建置的聲明。  延伸查詢new window
2.American Anthropological Association(1967)。Statement on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics。  new window
3.American Anthropological Association(1971)。Statement on Ethics: Principles of Professional Responsibility。  new window
4.American Anthropological Association(1990)。Principles of Professional Responsibility。  new window
5.American Anthropological Association(1998)。Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association。  new window
6.American Anthropological Association(2004)。American Anthropological Association Statement on Ethnography and Institutional Review Boards。  new window
7.American Anthropological Association(2009)。Code of Ethics of American Anthropological Association。  new window
8.American Anthropological Association(201l)。Proposed Revised Code of Ethics for Public Review。  new window
9.American Anthropological Association(201l)。Final Report of the Task Force for Comprehensive Ethics Review。  new window
10.Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and the Commonwealth(1999)。Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice。  new window
11.Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and the Commonwealth(2011)。Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃智慧(19990000)。日本對臺灣原住民族宗教的研究取向:殖民地時期官學並行傳統的形成與糾葛。人類學在臺灣的發展 : 回顧與展望篇。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃樹民(20110000)。人類學與民族學百年學術發展。中華民國發展史:學術發展。臺北:國立政治大學:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Boas, Franz(1973)。Correspondence: Scientists as Spies。The Nation 109: 729.Reprinted in To See Ourselves: Anthropology and Modern Social Issues。Glenview, IL:Scott, Foresman。  new window
4.Caplan, Patricia(2003)。Introduction: Anthropology and Ethics。The Ethics of Anthropology: Debates and Dilemmas。London:Routledge。  new window
5.Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn(2003)。Ethics and Anthropology 1890-2000: A Review of Issues and Principles。Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for Ethically Conscious Practice。Walnut Creek, CA:AltaMira Press。  new window
6.Hill, James N.(1987)。The Committee on Ethics: Past, Present and Future。Handbook on Ethical issues in Anthropology。Washington, D.C.:American Anthropological。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE