田野工作經驗的反思，始自發生在切身的故事。本研究旨趣在於針對筆者個人從2005年至2012年期間，所進行的運動口述史田野工作經驗的反思與說明，包括三大部分：運動口述史的「田野」釋義、自我田野經驗在運動口述史研究上的意義，以及運動口述史研究的倫理實踐。第一部分，本文藉用黃劍波「這裡就是田野」，與Mariza, G. S. Peirano提出的人類學在家鄉「情境中的差異」（otherness in context）等概念，同時立基於王明珂「在文獻中作田野」的方法，來說明我所從事的真實與想像的運動口述史「田野」。第二部分，本研究意義的闡述來自：從「邊緣」視角看問題的重要、歷史知識建構與研究參與者關係的發展，以及口述史田野的療法。第三部分，本文根基於臺灣民族誌影像學會研究倫理規範，闡明實踐的過程，包括「離開田野」（leaving the field）的退場機制，以做為一種己身所從事的田野工作之補充與檢討。最後文末歸結，田野工作就是一種研究者個人成長的紀錄與體悟。

The reflection on fieldwork experience starts from the stories happened to the researcher. This study aims to expound the reflection on my own experiences of fieldwork in oral history of sport during the years of 2005 to 2012. Three parts are included: the ＂fieldwork＂ definition of, the meaning of my fieldwork experience on, and the ethic practice of the sport oral history research. In the first part, the concepts of ＂here as the field＂, ＂otherness in context＂, and ＂a way to do ethnography in archives＂ proposed respectively by Jian-Bo Huang, Mariza, G. S. Peirano and Ming-Ke Wang were used to define my won real and image ＂field＂. The second part included the issues of viewing the phenomenon from ＂the periphery＂, the historical knowledge construction related to the relationship development of participants, and the cure of oral historical fieldwork. The third part described the process of practicing the research ethic based on the codes of Taiwan Association of Visual Ethnography, including the strategies for leaving the field. Finally, this study clarified that the fieldwork is the individual growth record and comprehension of the researcher.