臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣民眾景觀美感素養之研究
書刊名：造園景觀學報
作者：李彥希 引用關係／顏宏旭 引用關係
作者(外文)：Li, Yen-hsi／Yen, Hung-hsn
出版日期：2013
卷期：19:2
頁次：頁63-88
主題關鍵詞：景觀美感素養；層級分析法；Landscape aesthetic literacy；Analytic hierarchy process；AHP
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
在景觀評估之研究，過去主要針對景觀環境的屬性或是景觀元素去了解人們觀看景觀環境後所產生的心理感受程度，在觀看者或專業者部分之景觀美感素養之探究與分析仍付之闕如，而環境景觀美感的提昇，不僅專業者必須具備良好的景觀美感素養，一般民眾的景觀美感素養可能更是環境景觀美感提升的關鍵因素。因此，本研究以文獻回顧建構景觀美感素養之向度與因素，確立各層級因素後，再運用層級分析法訪談景觀之學者與專家，並以Expert Choice 11之軟體分析「景觀美感素養」評估指標之相對權重，以做為測量民眾景觀美感素養之權重分數。由研究結果可知，台灣民眾景觀美感素養自評的平均分數為3.36，百分分數為67.22分，而從統計分析結果中可知，43-62歲（中壯年）、個人月收入五萬元以上、目前居住在都市、曾有住過農村經驗的民眾其景觀美感素養較好；而就讀相關領域（自然生態、景觀建築及人文藝術）、曾從事景觀工作的專業者也明顯具有較佳的景觀美感素養。另外，最常接觸自然生態、景觀建築及人文藝術之民眾，且對其愈有興趣的民眾其景觀美感素養的表現也就愈佳。未來在景觀美感素養之養成與教育上本研究建議下列六個方向：(1).啟發體驗美感情感之感受、(2).提昇景觀良劣判斷之能力、(3).提供體會自然美感之機會、(4).培養相關領域知識之興趣、(5).深化相關領域知識之推廣，及(6).重視創意思考能力之教育。
In the past, studies of landscape evaluate were mainly to use attributes and elements of landscape to find out people's feeling rate after viewing the landscapes. But in the research of viewers' and professional landscape aesthetic are still rare. And the improving of landscape aesthetic, not only the professionals need to have good landscape aesthetic literacy, also the ordinary people's aesthetic literacy should be a key factor to improve the landscape aesthetic. Therefore, this study constructed the dimensions and factors of landscape aesthetic literacy with review of literature. Furthermore, we interviewed scholars and experts of landscape with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and obtained relative weight of indicators of landscape aesthetic literacy with Expert Choice 11 software in order to count people's score of literacy. The results show that mean of Taiwanese landscape aesthetic literacy is 3.36 and percentile score is 67.22. The results of analyses show that the respondents of 43-62 years old, personal monthly income of fifty thousands or more, currently living in the city, once lived in the rural area, studied in related field and landscape worker possess the more landscape aesthetic literacy. Moreover, the respondents that more frequently contact with the natural ecology, landscape architecture, art and humanities, and more interested with those show the more landscape aesthetic literacy. The results of the present study suggest six dimensions that are summarizing: (1). To inspire the experience of aesthetic feelings, (2). To enhance the judgment ability of landscape quality, (3). To provide the opportunities of appreciating the natural beauty, (4). To cultivate an interest in the knowledge of related field, (5). To deepen the promotion in knowledge of related fields, and (6). To emphasis the education of creative thinking.
期刊論文
1.Sevenant, M.、Antrop, M.(2009)。Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes。Journal of Environmental Management，90(9)，2889-2899。  new window
2.Junker, B.、Buchecker, M.(2008)。Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations。Landscape and Urban Planning，85(3/4)，141-154。  new window
3.張俊彥(2006)。台灣造圜學報之研究趨勢與展望。台灣造園學報，19(3)，23-44。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭廷坤(2000)。淺論想象在美感中的作用。許昌師專學報，19(3)，92-93。  延伸查詢new window
5.Chen, B.、Adimo, O. A.、Bao, Z.(2009)。Assessment of aesthetic quality and multiple functions of urban green space from the users5perspective: The case of Hangzhou Flower Garden, China。Landscape and Urban Planning，93，76-82。  new window
6.Daniel, Terry C.(2001)。Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century。Landscape and Urban Planning，54(1-4)，267-281。  new window
7.Eaton, M. M.(1995)。The social construction of aesthetic response。British Journal of Aesthetics，35(2)，95-107。  new window
8.Eben Saleh, M. A.(2001)。Environmental cognition in the vernacular landscape: assessing the aesthetic quality of Al-Alkhalaf village, Southwestern Saudi Arabia。Building and Environment，36，965-979。  new window
9.Frois, J. P.、Eysenck, H. J.(1995)。The visual aesthetic sensitivity test applied to Portuguese children and fine arts students。Creativity Research Journal，3，277-284。  new window
10.Hanley, N.、Ready, R.、Colombo, S.、Watson, F.、Stewart, M.、Bergmann, E. A.(2009)。The impacts of knowledge of the past on preferences for future landscape change。Journal of Environmental Management，90(3)，1404-1412。  new window
11.Lindemann-Matthies, P.、Junge, X.、Matthies, D.(2010)。The influence of plant diversity on people's perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation。Biological Conservation，143，195-202。  new window
12.Locher, P. L.、Stappers, P. J.、Overbeeke, K.(1999)。An empirical evaluation of the visual rightness theory of pictorial composition。Acta Psychologica，103，261-280。  new window
13.McManus, I.C.、Edmondson, D.、Rodger, J.(1985)。Balance in picture。British Journal of Psychology，76，311-324。  new window
14.Sevenant, M.、Antrop M.(2009)。The use of latent classes to identify individual differences。Landscape and Urban Planning，886，1-16。  new window
15.Soliva, R.、Hunziker, M.(2009)。Beyond the visual dimension: Using ideal type narratives to analyse people'€™s assessments of landscape scenarios。Land Use Policy，26，284-294。  new window
16.Brady, E.(1998)。Imagination and the aesthetic appreciation of nature。The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism，56(2)，139-147。  new window
17.Budd, Malcolm(1996)。The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature。British Journal of Aesthetics，36(3)，207-222。  new window
18.Carlson, Allen(1995)。Nature, Aesthetic Appreciation, and Knowledge。The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism，53(4)，393-400。  new window
19.Locher, P. L.(2003)。An empirical investigation of the visual rightness theory of picture perception。Acta Psychologica，114，147-164。  new window
20.Locher, P. L.、Gray, S.、Nodine C.(1996)。The structural framework of pictorial balance。Perception，25，1419-1436。  new window
21.Stephenson, Janet(2008)。The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes。Landscape and Urban Planning，84(2)，127-139。  new window
22.Ode, Å.、Tveit, M. S.、Messager, P.、Miller, D.、Fry, G.(2009)。Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference。Journal of Environmental Management，90(1)，375-383。  new window
23.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science，16(1)，74-94。  new window
24.Bloch, P. H.、Brunel, F. F.、Arnold, T. J.(2003)。Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement。Journal of Consumer Research，29(4)，551-565。  new window
研究報告
1.陳瓊花(2004)。臺灣民眾美感素養發展與藝術教育改進之研究 (計畫編號：930302)。台北：國立台灣藝術教育館。  延伸查詢new window
2.簡成熙(2009)。〈美感素養〉（Aesthetic Literacy)評析。台北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.朱雅華(2009)。台中市國小學生學業成就、創造力與美感素養之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李彥希(2006)。臺灣地區景觀美感因素結構之研究--以臺灣國家公園為例(博士論文)。中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃紫雲(2006)。學校行政人員美感素養之研究-以某國立大學行政人員為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘惠雯(2004)。國民中小學學生美感素養與其影響因素之研究-以視覺藝術為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.潘金定(2005)。臺灣社區大學學生美感素養之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.朱光潛(1989)。談美。臺南市：文國書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陶陶楚翰(2001)。藝術接受中主體美感產生諸由再探培訓與研究。湖北教育學院學報。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳寬裕、王正華(2011)。論文統計分析實務：SPSS與AMOS的運用。臺北：五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式--理論與應用。臺北市：五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：521（臺灣：512，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67581662
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上