:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多向文本與故事基模--國小學童述說科學發明故事之歷程探究
書刊名:設計學報
作者:廖冠智 引用關係薛永浩
作者(外文):Liao, Guan-zeSyue, Yong-hao
出版日期:2013
卷期:18:3
頁次:頁41-61
主題關鍵詞:多向文本故事基模科學發明故事組織思考聯想性推論HypertextStory schemaScientific invention storyOrganizational thinkingElaborative inference
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:23
本研究旨在以質性的敘事訪談方法,探究讀者經由數位介面進行閱讀多向文本的科學發明故事,自行選取故事基模並面臨不完整的故事文法結構時,其述說整體故事發展歷程中的聯想性推論與組織思考現象。研究參酌Campbell(1949)的神話學原型與Rumelhart(1975)的故事結構原理,自行撰述「萊特兄弟的飛行夢」科學發明故事,並發展探究多向文本故事的互動介面,藉以瞭解讀者以介面進行探究故事發展的述說歷程。以國小學童為研究對象,共進行兩階段的質性研究,第一階段文本介面以「動態摩天輪」的旋繞排列式概念為故事文法之呈現結構,探究敘事歷程的聯想性推論之特性後,再接續發展第二階段文本介面以「大腦組織結構」的空間拼圖式呈現概念,採以動態審視循環結合敘事訪談方法,完成整體敘事歷程的逐字稿文本分析,並探究歷程中的組織思考特性。研究結果得知單階層多向文本的動態摩天輪,其故事路徑呈現線性發展,當文本線索不足時多半引致敘事一致性的故事結局,且為自由想像與聯想推論出的內容,較無法表現出細緻與具體的描繪歷程。而雙階層多向文本的大腦組織結構,故事單元結合多向路徑,雖文本線索不足聯想性推論呈現的敘事內容,亦能聯繫與組織出完整的重述故事內容,即使多向文本兼具破碎與跳躍特性,亦能呈現連貫的敘事歷程,並呼應Campbell英雄旅程模式。研究結果提出多向文本敘事歷程的述說現象,並彙整出敘事方法之建議,期望能作為學童在科學故事創作,故事創意思考教學與數位敘事設計等實務依據與研究參考。
Scientific invention story is a common method in popularization of science and education. It is also a crucial medium for the students to understand science knowledge and the invention process. The readers' cognition of story depends on the progress of annotation explanatory between story schema and story grammar. The study conducted qualitative narrative interview to explore the elaborative inference and organizational thinking of whole story development of annotation explanatory during the process of reading hypertext story via digital interface and face the incomplete syntax structure by the readers. In addition, the study used the theory of story grammar as the foundation firstly based on the context and monomyth of typical characteristic from Campbell (1949) and story theories from Rumelhart (1975). The authors had written the story of ”The Dream of Wright Brothers”, and presented by hypertext structure. The empirical research had been conducted and used the method of the qualitative narrative interviews and text analysis to investigate narrative process of elementary students in the hypertext structure.The interview phase consists of two stages. The first is pilot interview, and experimental material of the hypertext structure of story presents the image of ”dynamic Ferris wheel”. And the preliminary results served as a reference for the formal interview stage, the second phase. The hypertext structure presents the concept of ”the composition of brain”. In this phase, the method of the ”The Active Reviewing Cycle” with semi-structured had been conducted to proceed the narrative interview, and in-depth qualitative analysis.Research findings suggest that the readers initially favored bridge inference in the text clues, of dynamic Ferris wheel. The story context could be regarded as the linear development. However, in the second phase of the composition of brain, the readers could make statement by use elaborative inference ability from the past related reading experience and representation from the story schema of them. In the non-linear hypertext structure as the story context, it is easy for readers to have organizational thinking and elaborative inference of the narrative. The authors hope that research findings can assist the references of scientific story creation, creative thinking and design of digital narrative by elementary students in the future.
期刊論文
1.Garrod, S.、O'Brien, E. J.、Morris, R. K.、Rayner, K.(1990)。Elaborative inferencing as an active or passive process。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,16(2),250-257。  new window
2.Kolb, D.(2005)。Association and argument: Hypertext in and around the writing process。New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia,11(1),7-26。  new window
3.Liao, G.-Z.(2011)。Multipath digital storytelling - A study on interaction design of the scientific invention story。Metaverse Creativity,2(1),7-31。  new window
4.O'Brien, E. J.、Shank, D. M.、Myers, J. L.、Rayner, K.(1988)。Elaborative inferences during reading:Do they occur online?。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,14,410-420。  new window
5.Rand, M. K.(1984)。Story schema: Theory, research and practice。The Reading Teacher,37(4),377-382。  new window
6.Scheub, H.(1975)。Oral narrative process and the use of models。New Literary History,6(2),353-377。  new window
7.王慕瑄(20060900)。帶孩子到沙灘上築城堡--談閱讀與組織能力。國教新知,53(3),53-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.魯忠义、彭建國、李強(2003)。中文故事閱讀中預期與前後推理關係。心理學報,35,183-189。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉電芝、張榮華(2004)。學習策略教學的類型、階段與特點。課程、教材、教法,3,17-21。  延伸查詢new window
10.Alba, J. W.、Hasher, L.(1983)。Is memory schematic?。Psychological Bulletin,93(2),203-231。  new window
11.Idol, L.、Croll, V. J.(1987)。Story-mapping Training as a Means of Improving Reading Comprehension。Learning Disability Quarterly,10(3),214-229。  new window
12.Thorndyke, Perry W.(1977)。Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse。Cognitive Psychology,9(1),77-110。  new window
13.Goodman, Kenneth S.(1967)。Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game。Journal of the reading specialist,6(4),126-135。  new window
14.McKoon, Gail、Ratcliff, Roger(1986)。Inferences about predictable events。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,12,82-91。  new window
15.Halasz, F. G.(1988)。Reflections on Notecards: Seven Issues for the Next Generation of Hypermedia Systems。Communications of the ACM,31(7),836-852。  new window
會議論文
1.王郁昭、鄭英耀、王靜如(2003)。科學故事融入自然科教學對學生科學本質觀之影響。中華民國第十九屆科學教育學術研討會。台北:臺灣師範大學理學院。1-7。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Tsang, A. K. T.(1995)。Negotiation of therapy agenda: Development of a process coding system(博士論文)。University of Toronto,Ontario, Canada。  new window
圖書
1.Andrew, G.(2004)。Interactive storytelling: Techniques for 21st Century fiction。Natick, MA:A K Peters Ltd.。  new window
2.Bradshaw, David(2007)。The Cambridge Companion to E. M. Forster。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Campbell, J.(1949)。The hero with a thousand faces。New York, NY:Bollingen。  new window
4.Clark, H. H.(1977)。Bridging。Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science。England, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Greenaway, R.(1993)。Playback: A Guide to Reviewing Activities。Windsor and Edinburgh:The Duke of Edinburgh's Award in association with Endeavour Scotland。  new window
6.Horton, W. K.(1990)。Designing and writing online documentation: Help files to hypertext。New York, NY:Wiley。  new window
7.Osborne, J.、Erduran, S.、Simon, S.(2004)。Ideas, evidence and argument in science. In-service training pack. Resource pack and video。London:Nuffield Foundation。  new window
8.Ryan, M. L.(2003)。Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic。Washington, DC:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
9.Schutze, F.(1983)。Narrative Repraesentation kollektiver schicksalsbetroffenheit。Erzaehlforschung。Stuttgart:J B Metzler。  new window
10.Sternberg, R. J.(2005)。Cognitive psychology。Belmont, CA:Thomson Wadsworth。  new window
11.林守為(1988)。兒童文學。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳正治(1990)。童話寫作研究。臺北:五南出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Bartlett, Frederic Charles(1932)。Remembering: A Study in Experimental and social Psychology。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Lambert, J.(2002)。Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community。Berkeley, CA:Center for Digital Storytelling。  new window
單篇論文
1.Schutze, F.(1977)。Die Technik des narrativen interviews in Interaktionsfeldstudien- dargestellt an einem Projekt zur erforschung von kommunalen machtstrukturen,Bielefeld, Germany:University of Bielefeld, Department of Sociology。  new window
其他
1.Joyce, M.(1996)。Twelve blue, electronic literature collection 1,http://collection.eliterature.org/1/works/joyce__twelve_blue.html, 2012/08/19。  new window
圖書論文
1.Barthes, R.、Heath, S.(1977)。The photographic message。Image, music, text。New York, NY:Hill and Wang。  new window
2.Rumelhart, D. E.(1975)。Notes on a schema for stories。Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
3.Stein, Nancy L.、Glenn, Christine G.(1979)。An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children。New Directions in Discourse Processing。ABLEX Publishing Corporation。  new window
4.Kintsch, W.(1977)。On comprehending stories。Cognitive processes in comprehension。Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE