:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:觀點革命:探討後設認知理論導入設計科系策展企劃教學之學習歷程與成效
書刊名:設計學報
作者:林家華
作者(外文):Lin, Chia-hua
出版日期:2021
卷期:26:2
頁次:頁111-134
主題關鍵詞:後設認知策展企劃認知策略學習成效設計科系MetacognitionCuratorial planningCognitive strategyLearning effectivenessDesign department
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:107
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.Sandell, R.(2006)。Form+Theme+Context: Balancing considerations for meaningful art learning。Art Education,59(1),33-37。  new window
2.Nelson, T. O.、Dunlosky, J.、Graf, A.、Narens, L.(1994)。Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning。Psychological Science,5,207-213。  new window
3.Field, H. S.、Giles, W. F.(1980)。Student satisfaction with graduate education dimensionality and assessment in a school of business。Educational Research Quarterly,5(2),66-73。  new window
4.Betz, Ellen L.、Klingensmith, John E.、Menne, John W.(1970)。The measurement and analysis of college student satisfaction。Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance,3(2),110-118。  new window
5.Cross, D. R.、Paris, S. G.(1988)。Development and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension。Journal of Educational Psychology,80,131-142。  new window
6.Yore, Larry D.、Treagust, David F.(2006)。Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy--Empowering research and informing instruction。International Journal of Science Education,28(2/3),291-314。  new window
7.黃巧慧、莊明振(20131200)。以「粉樂町政大續展」為例探討FTCC做為策展決策參考模式之可行性。設計學報,18(4),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.馬睿平、陳維翰(20131200)。後設認知觀點的歷史人物主題策展設計:以張七郎紀念展為例。設計學報,18(4),41-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Cull, W. L.、Zechmeister, E. B.(1994)。The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners?。Memory & Cognition,22,249-257。  new window
10.Tregaskes, M. R.、Daines, D.(1989)。Effects of metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension。Reading Research and Instruction,29(1),52-60。  new window
11.林廷宜(20131200)。專業策展人才養成:以美國藝術育才策略為例。設計學報,18(4),23-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Händel, M.、Dresel, M.(2018)。Confidence in performance judgment accuracy: The unskilled and unaware effect revisited。Metacognition and Learning,13,265-285。  new window
13.Foster, N. L.、Was, C. A.、Dunlosky, J.、Isaacson, R. M.(2017)。Even after thirteen class exams, students are still overconfident: The role of memory for past exam performance in student predictions。Metacognition and Learning,12,1-19。  new window
14.McDougall, J.、Potter, J.(2015)。Curating media learning: Towards a porous expertise。E-Learning and Digital Media,12(2),199-211。  new window
15.Kleitman, S.、Narciss, S.(2019)。Applied metacognition: Real-world applications beyond learning。Metacognition Learning,14,335-342。  new window
16.Ryan, P.、Kristen, T.(2018)。Course design, images, and the class curated exhibit。RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscript, and Culture Heritage,19(2),133-153。  new window
17.楊竣傑(2017)。必修能力2:策展整合--專案式時代,人人都是策展人。Cheers快樂工作人雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
18.Piccoli, G.、Ahmad, R.、Ives, B.(2001)。Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training。MIS Quarterly,25(4),401-426。  new window
學位論文
1.吳采純(2010)。建構取向的策展課程對國小學童藝術態度影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.佐佐木俊尚、郭菀琪(2012)。Curation策展的時代:「串聯」的資訊革命已經開始!。經濟新潮社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Burke, Kay(1999)。The mindful school: how to assess authentic learning。SkyLight Training and Publishing Inc.。  new window
3.漢寶德(2004)。展示規劃--理論與實務。臺北市:田園城市。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bloom, B. S.、Engelahar, M. D.、Frust, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。Taxonomy of Educational Objective, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain。New York:David McKay。  new window
5.Likert, Rensis(1932)。A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes。  new window
6.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Mangano, Joseph A.,Corrado, Thomas J.(1979)。Adult students' satisfaction at six two-year colleges(No. ED 180563)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hacker, D. J.(1998)。Metacognition: Definitions and empirical foundations。Metacognition in educational theory and practice。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Brown, A. L.(1987)。Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms。Metacognition, motivation, and understanding。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Winne, P. H.、Hadwin, A. F.(1998)。Studying as self-regulated engagement in learning。Metacognition in educational theory and practice。Erlbaum。  new window
4.Scardamalia, M.、Bereiter, C.(2006)。Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology。The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Flavell, J. H.(1987)。Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition。Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding。Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
6.Tammaro, A. M.、Madrid, M.、Casarosa, V.(2013)。Digital curators' education: Professional identity vs. convergence of LAM (libraries, archives, museums)。Digital libraries and archives。Springer-Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE