:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「保存-資源善用」環境態度量表之編製研究
書刊名:測驗學刊
作者:林新沛 引用關係黃馨蕙余麗樺 引用關係
作者(外文):Lam, San-puiHuang, Hsin-hwaiYu, Li-fa
出版日期:2014
卷期:61:1
頁次:頁79-104
主題關鍵詞:土地開發保存保育資源善用環境態度Environmental attitudeLand developmentPreservationResource conservation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
本研究旨在編製一個可以忠實反映保存觀點(preservation)與資源善用觀點(resource conservation)的環境態度量表,並實際探討這兩種觀點是否和填答者支持開發自然環境的態度有關。首先,本研究根據環境倫理學家對於保存觀點以及資源善用觀點的定義撰寫量表題目,並經專家效度評定和訪談目標填答者之後,刪除或修改題目內容,共保留60題。之後對預試樣本299人施測,從中挑選出鑑別度較佳的36題形成正式量表,施測於正式受測樣本302人,以建立本量表的信效度資料。研究結果顯示,本研究編製的「保存-資源善用」環境態度量表具有理想的信效度。此外,愈認同保存觀點的填答者愈反對開發;愈認同資源善用觀點的填答者則愈支持開發。本研究另發展一個題數減半的簡短版本,以提高本量表的實用價值。最後,有關本量表的限制與未來可能的應用方向於文末討論。
This study aims to develop a scale for assessing two sets of environmental worldviews: Resource conservation and preservation, and further investigate their relationship to the support of development projects. At the first stage of scale construction, initial items were derived from environmental ethics theories and reviewed by three experts, and were pretested on five college students to form a preliminary scale of 60 items. Based on data from 299 college students, good items were selected by their item-total correlations, factor loadings, and the t values of difference between extreme groups. The 36 items that performed best on the above criteria formed the final scale. To assess the reliability and validity of this scale, we administered it to another group of 302 college students. Results showed that both the reliability and validity were satisfactory. Participants who scored high on preservation objected development projects more. In contrast, participants who scored high on resource conservation supported the projects more. Furthermore, the scale was simplified by reducing the total number of items by half. This new, shorten version also had internal consistency and validity evidence as good as those for the full-length scale. Finally, the limitations and applications of this scale were discussed.
期刊論文
1.Dietz, T.、Stern, P. C.、Guagnano, G. A.(1998)。Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern。Environment and Behavior,30(4),450-471。  new window
2.Bogner, F. X.、Wiseman, M.(2006)。Adolescents, attitudes towards nature and environment: Quantifying the 2-MEV model。The Environmentalist,26(4),247-254。  new window
3.Callicott, J. B.(1990)。Whither conservation ethics。Conservation Biology,4(1),15-20。  new window
4.Lundmark, C.(2007)。The new ecological paradigm revisited: Anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics。Environmental Education Research,13(3),329-347。  new window
5.Milfont, T. L.、Duckitt, J.(2010)。The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes。Journal of Environmental Psychology,30(1),80-94。  new window
6.Perley, C. J. K.(2003)。Resourcism and preservationism in New Zealand forestry: An end to the dichotomy?。New Zealand Journal of Forestry,48(2),11-17。  new window
7.Rauwald, K. S.、Moore, C. F.(2002)。Environmental attitudes as predictors of policy support across three countries。Environment and Behavior,34(6),709-739。  new window
8.Fransson, N.、Gärling, T.(1999)。Environmental Concern: Conceptual Definitions, Measurement Methods, and Research Findings。Journal of Environmental Psychology,19(4),369-382。  new window
9.Dunlap, R. E.、Van Liere, K. D.、Mertig, A. G.、Jones, R. E.(2000)。Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised Nep Scale。The Journal of Social Issues,56(3),425-442。  new window
10.Dunlap, R. E.、Van Liere, K. D.(1978)。The New Environmental Paradigm: A Proposed Measuring Instrumental and Preliminary Results。The Journal of Environmental Education,9(1),10-19。  new window
11.Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55。  new window
12.Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1998)。Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparamenterized model misspecification。Psychological Methods,3(4),424-453。  new window
13.Thompson, S. C. G.、Barton, M. A.(1994)。Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment。Journal of Environmental Psychology,14(2),149-157。  new window
圖書
1.柯倍德、羅斯頓、陳慈美(2007)。環境倫理學入門。臺北:生態關懷者協會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王毅丰(2010)。登廣告挺石化工業局:臺灣需要國光石化,http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/54442, 2011/11/10。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡嘉陽(2010)。彰化海岸溼地的愛與死,http://e-info.org.tw/node/51619, 2010/10/24。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.DesJardins, J. R.(2006)。Ethics and economics: Managing public lands。Environmental ethics: An introduction to environmental philosophy。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。  new window
2.DesJardins, J. R.(2006)。Science, ethics, and the environment。Environmental ethics: An introduction to environmental philosophy。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth。  new window
3.Eckersley, R.(1992)。Exploring the environmental spectrum: From anthropocentrism to ecocentrism。Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach。New York, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
4.Gardner, G. T.、Stem, P. C.(2002)。Religious and moral approaches: Changing values, beliefs, and worldview。Environmental problems and human behavior。Boston, MA:Pearson。  new window
5.Hunter, M. L. Jr.、Gibbs, J.(2007)。Conservation and conservation biology。Fundamentals of conservation biology。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
6.Oelschlaeger, M.(1991)。Contemporary wilderness philosophy。The idea of wilderness: From prehistory to the age of ecology。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top