羽球與網球都是相當仰賴全面性體能的運動項目，然而針對兩項運動健康與競技體適能之優劣勢仍待更近一步釐清。目的：本研究的目的在於比較並了解羽球及網球運動員健康與競技體適能的差異，以作為未來教練在選材及體能訓練課程安排的參考。方法：招募30位大專一般組羽球及網球男性選手（每項目各15名）。受試者隨機進行健康與競技體適能測驗，項目包含身體、體重、一分鐘屈膝仰臥起坐、坐姿體前彎、三分鐘登階、壘球擲遠、反應測驗、閉眼單腳站立、30公尺衝刺、連續三次跳及T型敏捷測驗等項目。數據資料以描述性統計分析，獨立樣本t檢定比較羽球與網球選手健康與競技體適能之差異，顯著水準訂為α = .05。結果：羽球與網球選手在柔軟度成績有顯著差異（p ＞ .05），而其他健康體適能項目則無差異增加（p ＞ .05）。羽球與網球選手於協調、反應、爆發力及敏捷表現有顯著差異（p ＜ .05），平衡及速度則無差異。結論：羽球選手於柔軟度、反應時間及敏捷性優於網球選手，而網球選手之協調性與爆發力高於羽球選手，建議將來教練在選材及訓練課程安排上，可以參考其他項目訓練成效上之優勢，以達成全面提升選手體適能之目標。

Badminton and tennis players needs overall physical fitness capacity. However, there are still unclear as compared of badminton and tennis players on health and sport-related physical fitness. Purpose: the purpose of this study was to compare the health and sport-related physical fitness between badminton and tennis players. This outcome could offer coach in training programs arrangement in the future. Methods: thirty male healthyplayers were recruited from badminton and tennis teams and randomly performed height, weight, 60s curl up, sit and reach, 3 min step test, softball throwing, reaction time, stand on one leg with eyes closed, 30m sprint, triple standing jump and T agility tests. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Independent t tests wereused to compare differences of badminton and tennis players. Significant level was set at α = .05. Results: there was significant difference on flexibility between badminton and tennis players (p ＜ .05). Moreover, there were significant differences on coordination, reaction time, power and agility (p ＜ .05). Conclusion: Badminton players had advantages on flexibility, reaction time and agility as compared to tennis ones. However, tennis players had higher coordination and power than badminton ones. We recommend that coaches can used the superiority of different sports and arrange in training programs in the future, for achievingthe goal of enhance overall physical fitness.