:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從四分之一到三分之一?婦女保障席次的選舉效應評估
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:鮑彤 引用關係莊文忠 引用關係林瓊珠 引用關係
作者(外文):Batto, Nathan F.Juang, Wen-jongLin, Chiung-chu
出版日期:2014
卷期:32:1
頁次:頁99-141
主題關鍵詞:女性參政婦女保障名額選舉制度選舉效應性別差距Female political participationFemale reserved seatsElectoral systemsElectoral effectsGender gap
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:86
民主政治的基本原則之一即是實踐政治平等,性別平等即是其一,時至今日,雖然有不少國家已經出現女性的政治領袖,國會中的女性議員亦不在少數,但絕大多數國家的政治權力依然掌握在男性的手上,是以,如何提升女性的政治代表性和政治參與度,也就深為相關團體和各國政府所關注。有鑑於此,為了提高女性參與政治的意願與機會,各國在推展民主化的政治工程中往往會設計不同的制度性誘因,期能達到一定的成效,如婦女保障名額制度即是箇中一例。不過,任何制度的誘因效果不能僅從制度本身加以檢視,尚需考量制度運作的環境系絡,否則可能出現「名不符實」或「忘梅止渴」的現象。另外,任何的制度設計都可能出現「天花板效應」或「地板效應」,效益變化的幅度明顯減緩,此時即是制度趨疲的跡象,需要再次進行制度變革,重新發揮誘因效果。本研究以臺灣縣市議員選舉為例,利用1998年至2010年的選舉資料,以選區為單位,分析婦女保障名額制度的誘因機制是否產生效果的探討,企圖回答幾個理論層次的問題:(1)此一制度是否激勵了女性參選的意願?(2)此一制度是否影響政黨提名的策略?(3)此一制度是否提高了女性當選的機會?(4)此一制度的變革(提高保障席次比例)對女性的參選和當選是否會造成影響?並從中獲得一些正面結論與反思,有助於吾人思考婦女保障名額制度變革所可能衍生的相關效應。
Political equality is one of the core values of democracy, and one facet of this is gender equality. While women are no longer rare in national legislatures and have ascended to leadership positions in many countries, it is still true that most political power is wielded by men. As such, democrats around the world seek to further increase the presence of women in politics. One common strategy is to build incentives into the institutional structure, and Taiwan's electoral system of SNTV with reserved female seats is one such example. There are concerns that this system has not been effective in promoting gender equality. Some worry that it has only created a ”floor effect,” merely guaranteeing a minimum number of women, or, even worse, a ”ceiling effect.” However, there is little empirical evidence supporting these fears. In this paper, we examine city and county council elections from 1998 to 2010, with the electoral district as the unit of analysis. We consider the incentives created by the reserved seat system and look at whether reserved seats have in fact produced (1) more overall female candidate, (2) large parties nominating more female candidates, and (3) more female winners. Finally, we examine a previous reform in the number of quota seats to determine whether (4) increasing the number of reserved seats would increase the number of women elected. In all instances, we find the reserved seat system to be a very powerful spur, and this has important implications for future institutional reforms.
期刊論文
1.Batto, Nathan F.(2014)。Was Taiwan's Electoral Reform Good for Women? SNTV, MMM, Gender Quotas, and Female Representation。Issues & Studies。new window  new window
2.Caul, Miki(1999)。Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties。Party Politics,5(1),79-98。  new window
3.Hickman, John C.(1997)。The Candidacy and Election of Women in Japanese SNTV Electoral Systems。Women and Politics,18(2),1-26。  new window
4.Nanivadekar, Medha(2006)。"Are Quota a Good Idea"? The Indian Experience With Reserved Seats for Women。Politics and Gender,2,119-128。  new window
5.Norris, Pippa(1985)。Women's Legislative Participation in Western Europe。West European Politics,8(4),90-101。  new window
6.Park, Kyung-ae(1999)。Political Representation and South Korea Women。The Journal of Asian Studies,58(2),432-448。  new window
7.Reynolds, Andrew(1999)。Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World. Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling。World Politics,51(4),547-572。  new window
8.姜貞吟(20050400)。兩性參政之現況問題與未來展望。國家政策季刊,4(1),33-68。  延伸查詢new window
9.梁雙蓮(1993)。影響台灣省女性議員參政的背景因素分析(1951-1989)。社會科學論叢,41,1-30。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳昭如(20120600)。改寫男人的憲法:從平等條款、婦女憲章到釋憲運動的婦運憲法動員。政治科學論叢,52,43-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃長玲(20120600)。差異政治的形成:1946年婦女保障名額制訂的歷史過程。政治科學論叢,52,89-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Manza, Jeff、Brooks, Clem(1998)。The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?。American Journal of Sociology,103(5),1235-1266。  new window
13.周碧娥(19870300)。臺灣地區婦女政治參與的變遷。社區發展季刊,37,13-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李南海(19980200)。制憲時期婦女爭取代表名額始末--以國民大會代表之選舉為例。近代中國,123,170-190。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃長玲(20010500)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則--兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究,40(3),69-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡宗珍(19971000)。關於民意代表之婦女保障名額條款的另類思考。婦女與兩性研究通訊,44,5-7。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林瓊珠(2011)。女性國會議員之保障制度及其效果的跨國比較分析。2011臺灣政治學會年會暨「辛亥百年與兩岸政治發展」學術研討會,(會議日期: 2011年 11月11-13日)。台北:政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.莊文忠、鄭夙芬、林瓊珠、吳文妃、張鐙文、謝仁煊(2012)。我國選舉制度婦女保障名額之研究 (計畫編號:RDEC-RES-100-008)。臺北市:行政院硏究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Carroll, Susan J.(1994)。Women as Candidates in American Politics。Bloomington:Indiana University Press。  new window
2.Dahlerup, Drude(2006)。Women, Quotas, and Politics。New York:Roultedge。  new window
3.Krook, Mona Lena(2009)。Quotas for Women in Politics-Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Opello, Katherine A. R.(2006)。Gender Quotas, Parity Reform, and Political Parties in France。Lexington Book。  new window
5.Sawer, Marian、Manon Tremblay、Linda Trimble(2006)。Representing Women in Parliament-A Comparative Study。New York:Routledge Press。  new window
其他
1.International IDEA(2009)。Quota Project: Global Database of Quotas for Women,http://www.quotaproject.org/country.cfm, 2014/04/17。  new window
2.全國婦女國是會議(2010)。「全國婦女國是會議全面啟動」記者會,https://www.facebook.com/women100/notes, 2013/10/31。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐佩君(2011003)。婦女保障當選馬喊目標40%。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.梁惠錦(2000)。婦女爭取參政代表保障名額的經過。蔣夫人宋美齡女士與近代中國學術討論集。台北:近代中國出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE