臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：辯論不應在臺灣高中英語教育中缺席：論未來高中英語辯論教學之宗旨目標、面向內涵、推動管道及預期效益
書刊名：中等教育
作者：常紹如 引用關係／吳美貞
作者(外文)：Chang, Shau-ju／Wu, Angela Mei-chen
出版日期：2014
卷期：65:4
頁次：頁53-78
主題關鍵詞：英語辯論教學；臺灣高中；宗旨目標；型式內容；教學效益；English debate instruction；Taiwanese high schools；Purposes；Content；Educational benefits
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:27
為國內高中英語辯論教學之催生請命，論文首先闡述國內外文獻所提及有關「英語」辯論之學習效益，並介紹東亞地區包括中國、日本、韓國與我國等地之英語辯論現況，藉以證明高中英語辯論教學之正當性與急迫性。論文次節提出以「外語社會化理論」為依據架構英語教育中之辯論教學，即將英語辯論教學視為幫助學生達成三種與辯論相關之社會化過程，包括強調「辯論菁英培訓」的「英語辯論比賽」、強調「辯論基本知能發展」的「課堂英語辯論教學」、及強調「辯論生活化」的「辯論與現代公民養成」等三大目標與類型。品最後針對臺灣中、高等教育之人物力現況提出高中英語辯論教學之可能推行方式，並就高中英語辯論教學所將帶來之效益與貢獻做一綜合推估。
Given the multifarious educational benefits of English debate and its long absence in local English curriculum, this paper argues that debate ought to be integrated into the current high school English curriculum in Taiwan. To do so, the paper first reviews the pedagogical merits of debate and summarizes the current practice of English debate in secondary schools in non-English-speaking Asian countries just to illustrate that English debate has not received the attention it duly deserves in Taiwan. Using the theory of language socialization as a program-designing framework, this paper then argues that English debate in Taiwan should include (I) competitive debate training to enable elite students to compete in local and international forensics events, (2) debate-like classroom discussion to equip all students with basic ability to engage in oral English argumentation, and (3) citizenship training to help students to live up to their rights and responsibility as a member of a modern society. Possible forms of promotion and implementation in the above three domains are then proffered. The paper finally ends with a discussion of estimated benefits English debate training can bring about for local high school students and, ultimately, for the future development of our country.
期刊論文
1.常紹如(20080300)。An Analysis of the Cicero English Debate Tournament 2004-2006 and Its Implications for Coaching High School Students for Competitive English Policy Debate。英語教學，32(1)，1-44。new window  new window
2.Duff, Patricia A.(2002)。The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream。Applied Linguistics，23(3)，289-322。  new window
3.Stewart, T.(2003)。Debate for ESOL students。TESOL Journal，12(1)，9-15。  new window
4.Bellon, J.(2000)。A research-based justification for debate across the curriculum。Argumentation and Advocacy，36(3)，161-175。  new window
5.Beltran, S.、Lowrie, S.(2002)。Accenting debate: Increasing debate participation by English as a second language and limited English proficiency students。Rostrum，76(5)。  new window
6.Brembeck, W. L.(1949)。The effects of a course in argumentation on critical thinking ability。Speech Monographs，16，177-189。  new window
7.Carleton, W. G.(1949)。Let us keep debating in our school。Vital Speeches of the Day，15(22)，703。  new window
8.Carr, J.(2002)。Debate: Academic virtues debate provides。The Rostrum，76(5)。  new window
9.Churc, R.(1975)。The educational value of oral communication courses and intercollegiate forensics: An opinion survey of college prelegal advisors and law school deans。The Journal of the American Forensic Association，12，49-53。  new window
10.Colbert, K.(1987)。The effects of CEDA and NDT debate training on critical thinking ability。Journal of the American Forensic Association，23，194-201。  new window
11.Ten Dam, G.、Volman, M.(2004)。Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies。Learning and Instruction，14(4)，359-379。  new window
12.Durkin, K.(2008)。The adaptation of East Asian masters students to western norms of critical thinking and argumentation in the UK。Intercultural Education，19(1)，15-27。  new window
13.Durkin, K.(2008)。The Middle Way: East Asian students' perceptions of critical argumentation in U.K. universities。Journal of Studies in International Education，12(1)，38-55。  new window
14.Lustigovà, L.(2011)。Speak your mind: Simplified debates as a learning tool at the university level。Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science，4(1)，18-30。  new window
15.Jackson, M.(1973)。Debate: A neglected teaching tool。Peabody Journal of Education，50(2)，150-155。  new window
16.Sheckels, T. F.(1983)。Three strategies for deliberative discourse: A lesson from competitive debating。College Composition and Communication，31(1)，31-42。  new window
17.Tumposky, N. R.(2004)。The debate debate。Clearing House，78(2)，52-55。  new window
18.Allen, M.、Berkowitz, S.、Louden, A.(1995)。A study comparing the impact of communication classes and competitive forensic experience on critical thinking improvement。The Forensic，81，1-7。  new window
19.Allen, M.、Berkowitz, S.(1999)。A meta-analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking。Communication Education，48(1)，18-30。  new window
20.Chang, S.(2009)。A content analysis study of the debates from the 2007 Taipei High School Cicero English Debate Tournament。Journal of Applied English，2，1-30。  new window
21.Malton, R. J.、Keele, L. M.(1984)。A survey of participants in the National Debate Tournament, 1947-1980。Journal of the American Forensic Association，20，194-205。  new window
22.Williams, D. E.、McGee, B. R.、Worth, D. S.(2001)。University student perceptions of the efficacy of debate participation: An empirical investigation。Argumentation and Advocacy，37，198-209。  new window
23.Wood, S.、Rowland-Morin, P. A.(1989)。Motivational tension: Winning vs. pedagogy in academic debate。National Forensic Journal，7，81-97。  new window
24.Duff, P. A.(2003)。New directions in second language socialization research。Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics，3，309-339。  new window
25.Harklau, L.(1994)。ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments。TESOL Quarterly，28，241-272。  new window
26.Byron, S.、Goldstein, L.、Murphy, D.、Roberts, E.(1993)。Interdisciplinary dimensions of debate。Hongkong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching，16，31-52。  new window
27.Iverson, J. O.、Hoerer, J.(2001)。Debate as a whole language tool for migrant students。Rostrum，75(5)，24-25。  new window
28.Huang, L.(2002)。Debate as a pathway to academic discussion。TESOL Journal，11(4)，30-31。  new window
29.Jerome, Lee、Algarra, Bhavini(2005)。Debating debating: a reflection on the place of debate within secondary schools。The Curriculum Journal，16(4)，493-508。  new window
30.Pollock, A.(1982)。The relationship of a background in scholastic forensics to effective communication in the legislative assembly。Speaker and Gavel，19，17。  new window
31.Semlak, W. D.、Shields, D.(1977)。The effect of debate training on students participation in bicentennial youth debates。Journal of the American Forensic Association，13(4)，194-196。  new window
32.Colbert, K.、Biggers, T.(1985)。Why should we support debate?。Journal of the American Forensic Association，21，237-240。  new window
會議論文
1.Brinton, D.(200003)。Investigating the "C" in content-based instruction。The annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics。Vancouver, CA。  new window
研究報告
1.Chi, F.(1996)。Combination of speaking and writing in English teaching: From discussion to debate (計畫編號：NSC No.852418-HI-94003)。Taipei：National Science Council。  new window
學位論文
1.Lee, W.(2005)。The effects of debate on oral communication skills among university students in Taiwan: A case study(碩士論文)。National Tsing Hua University。  new window
2.Barfield, K. D.(1989)。A study of the relationship between active participation in interscholastic debating and the development of critical thinking skills with implications for school administrators and instructional leaders(博士論文)。University of Alabama。  new window
圖書
1.賴亦恩、林照真(2013)。你怎能不愛上辯論：亦恩的辯論天堂。新北市：INK印刻文學生活雜誌出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Celce-Murcia, M.(1985)。Beyond basics: Issues and research in TESOL。Rowley, MA：Newbury House。  new window
3.Fine, G. A.(2001)。Gifted tongues: High school debate and adolescent culture。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Johnston, G.(1994)。The logic and language of English debate: A practical guide for Chinese students of EFL。Taipei：Bookman。  new window
5.Maloy, K.(1993)。Toward a new science of instruction。Pittsburgh, PA：National Research Center on Student Learning。  new window
6.Qualifications and Curriculum Authority(1999)。The national curriculum。London：QCA。  new window
7.Snider, A.、Schnurer, M.(2006)。Many sides: Debate across the curriculum。New York：International Debate Education Association。  new window
8.Rogoff, B.(1990)。Apprenticesnip in thinking: Cognitive development in social context。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Bloom, B. S.、Engelhart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1, Cognitive domain。New York：Longman。  new window
10.Ochs, Elinor(1988)。Culture and Language Development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner,‎ Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen(1978)。Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Lave, Jean、Wenger, Etienne(1991)。Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Qualification and Curriculum Authority(1998)。Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools。London, UK：Qualification and Curriculum Authority。  new window
14.Doughty, C.、Long, M.(2003)。The handbook of second language acquisition。London：Blackwell。  new window
單篇論文
1.Cronin, M.(199004)。Debating to learn across the curriculum: Implementing and assessment. Paper presented at the Southern States Communication Association Convention，Birmingham, AL。(ED 327092)。  new window
其他
1.(2009)。普通高級中學英語科課程綱要補充說明，http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/ B0035/03， 2011/02/09。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Harklau, L.(2003)。Representational practices and multi-modal communication in US high schools: Implications for adolescent immigrants。Language socialization in bilingual and multilingual societies。Clevedon, UK：Multilingual Matters。  new window
2.Harvey, K.、Woods, S.(2008)。“Let’ s talk” : A methodology for participatory community discourse。Frontiers of the 21st century: Argumentation, debate and the struggle for a civil society。New York：International Debate Education Association。  new window
3.Schroeder, A.、Schroeder, P.(1995)。Education objectives and forensics: An administration perception。The Forensic of Pi Kappa Delta。  new window
4.Street, B. V.(1994)。Cross cultural perspectives on literacy。Language and literacy in social practice。Milton Keynes：Open University Press。  new window
5.Zompetti, J. P.(2008)。The role of debate activism for civil societies。Frontiers of the 21st century: Argumentation, debate and the struggle for a civil society。New York：International Debate Education Association。  new window
6.Doughty, Catherine J.(2003)。Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement。The Handbook of second language acquisition。Blackwell。  new window
7.Duff, P. A.(1997)。Immersion in Hungary: An EFL experiment。Immersion education: International perspectives。Cambridge：New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Gee, James Paul(1994)。Orality and Literacy: From the Savage Mind to Ways with Words。Language and Literacy in Social Practice: A Reader。Clevedon, UK：Multilingual Matters Ltd.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：412（臺灣：412，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1972506 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67771699
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上