:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「反軍事風尚」形成對臺灣國防安全之影響
書刊名:遠景基金會季刊
作者:陳偉華 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Wei-hwa
出版日期:2014
卷期:15:4
頁次:頁63-103
主題關鍵詞:反軍事風尚傳統安全非傳統安全軍事安全募兵制Anti-military fashionTraditional securityNon-traditional securityMilitary securityAll volunteer force
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:107
  • 點閱點閱:31
「反軍事風尚」興起於冷戰後期,主在批判傳統安全觀對國家安全的挾制。核心問題在於軍事威脅形成的安全論述,限縮了國家安全決策選項、影響資源配置及零和式的對決關係,無助於未來國際社會的安全解決。毫無疑問,這股風潮似也影響臺灣的安全觀。1991年後的兩岸關係發展,局部反映出此一事實。然本文研究發現,「反軍事風尚」固然有利兩岸和平締造,但值得反思地是,這股風潮對臺灣安全而言,不宜也不該以削弱臺灣自衛武力為前提。
The fashion for being anti-military arose towards the close of the Cold War. It amounted to a criticism of the role a traditional view of security played in ensuring state security. The key to defense in that view lay in the threat of military force. This theory limited the options available for national defense, influenced the use of resources and relied on a zero-sum model. It did not help in guaranteeing international security. It comes as no surprise that the anti-military fashion also influenced national defense in Taiwan. The development in cross-strait relations since 1991 was, in part, a reflection of this influence. This paper finds that while the antimilitary fashion did indeed contribute to peacemaking across the straits, yet it is not beneficial to Taiwan's security and should not be allowed to weaken Taiwan's self-defense by military force.
期刊論文
1.陳偉華(20100700)。從「安全困境」至「防衛困境」:臺灣國防的反思與策勵。遠景基金會季刊,11(3),59-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.、Lynn-Jones, Sean M.(1988)。International Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the Field。International Security,12(4),5-27。  new window
3.李毓峰(20110400)。中共推動兩岸軍事安全互信機制之評析。全球政治評論,34,71-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.戴東清(20090700)。外交休兵政策的內涵與中、日、美三方反應之初探。亞太研究通訊. 南華大學亞太研究所,7,129-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Latham, Robert(1995)。Knowledge and Security in a Post-Cold War World。Items,49(2/3),43-48。  new window
6.Buzan, Barry(1984)。Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations。Journal of Peace Research,21(2),109-125。  new window
7.Bull, Hedley(1968)。Strategic Studies and its Critics。World Politics,20(4),593-605。  new window
8.Deudney, Daniel(1990)。The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security。Millennium,19(3),461-476。  new window
9.Huntington, Samuel P.(1993)。The Clash of Civilization?。Foreign Affairs,72(3),22-49。  new window
10.莫大華(19980800)。「安全研究」論戰之評析。問題與研究,37(8),19-33+86。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Ullman, Richard H.(1983)。Redefining Security。International Security,8(1),129-153。  new window
12.Wolfers, Arnold(1952)。"National Security" as an Ambiguous Symbol。Political Science Quarterly,67(4),481-502。  new window
13.蔡育岱、譚偉恩(20080300)。從「國家」到「個人」:人類安全概念之分析。問題與研究,47(1),151-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Baldwin, David A.(1995)。Security Studies and the End of the Cold War。World Politics,48(1),117-141。  new window
圖書
1.Yager, Harry R.(2008)。Strategy and the National Security Professional : Strategic Thinking and Strategy Formulation in the 21st Century。Westport:Prager。  new window
2.Gray, Colin S.(1999)。Modern Strategy。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Buzan, Barry、Hansen, Lene(2009)。The Evolution of International Security Studies。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(2010)。Power and Interdependence。Glenview, Illinois:Little Brown。  new window
5.Gray, Colin S.(2013)。Perspectives on Strategy。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Sheehan, Michael(2005)。International Security: An Analytical Survey。London。  new window
7.Lynn-Jones, Sean M.(1991)。International Security after the Cold War: An Agenda for the Future CSIA Discussion Paper 91-11。Cambridge:Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Yuan, Hong-bing(2010)。The Taiwan Crisis: China's Plan to Annex Taiwan without a Battle by 2012。Taipei:Tzung Mei Co。  new window
9.U.S. Department of Defense(1995)。Joint Doctrine for Military Operation Other Than War。  new window
10.Buzan, Barry(1987)。An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and International Relations。London:Macmillan。  new window
11.Cambone, Stephen A.(1998)。A New Structure for National Security Policy Planning。Washington, DC:Center for Strategic and International Studies。  new window
12.Gray, Colin S.(1982)。Strategic Studies and Public Policy: The American Experience。The University Press of Kentucky。  new window
13.Khalilzad, Zalmay、Lesser, Ian O.(1998)。Sources of Conflict in the 21st Century: Regional Future and U.S. Strategy。Santa Monica:RAND。  new window
14.Buzan, Barry Gordon、Wæver, Ole、De Wilde, Jaap(1998)。Security: a New Framework for Analysis。Lynne Rienner Publishers。  new window
15.吳萬寶(20030000)。歐洲安全暨合作組織 : 導論與基本文件。臺北:韋伯文化國際。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Kratochwi, Friedrich V.(1989)。Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Fukuyama, Francis(1992)。The End of History and the Last Man。London:New York:Hamish Hamilton:Free Press。  new window
18.Buzan, Barry(1991)。People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era。Boulder, Colo:Lynne Rienner。  new window
19.中華民國國防部(2011)。中華民國壹百年國防報告書。臺北:國防部。  延伸查詢new window
20.莫大華(20030000)。建構主義國際關係理論與安全研究。臺北:時英。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Wachman, Alan M.(2007)。Why Taiwan? Geostrategic Rationales for China's Territorial Integrity。Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press。  new window
其他
1.陳慧萍(20130410)。卜睿哲:兩岸和平協議無助臺灣安全。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱琮皓,王玉樹(20141005)。陸阻撓我與澳簽FTA。  延伸查詢new window
3.王銘義(20130714)。國臺辦:外國勢力介入於事無補。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20130405)。錢從哪裡來軍購怎樣才夠。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20110922)。國防主要憑藉:不在F16,而在一中各表。  延伸查詢new window
6.羅添斌,楊政郡(20140311)。國安局驚爆去年迄今查獲15 件共諜9成現退役軍人。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20110519)。陳炳德:對台軍售損美中關係,http://n.yam.com/cna/international/201105/20110519069925.html。  延伸查詢new window
8.中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室(20110331)。2010年中國的國防,http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2011-03/31/c_121252219_2.htm, 。  延伸查詢new window
9.林琮盛(20130625)。軍事互信對談陸方炮口朝美,http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/%e8%bb%8d%e4%ba%8b%e4%ba%92%e4%bf%a1%e5%b0%8d%e8%ab%87-%e9%99%b8%e6%96%b9%e7%82%ae%e5%8f%a3%e6%9c%9d%e7%be%8e-20130625001033-260301。  new window
10.林楠森(20110512)。馬英九:以三道防線強化台灣安全,http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/chinese_news/2011/05/110512_taiwan_president.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
11.曹逸雯(20090422)。遠見民調64%認為中國不會對台動武47.3%表示美國重視台灣,http://www.nownews.com/2009/04/22/949146。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳慧萍(20130616)。黎安友:中國對台以商逼政逐漸成功,http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2013/new/jun/16/today-fo1-3.htm。  延伸查詢new window
13.翁路易(20131112)。阿帕契買貴了台灣當冤大頭,http://www.chinatimes.com/cn/newspapers/20131112000979-260301。  延伸查詢new window
14.吳協昌(20130609)。歐習會臺灣議題陸提禁止軍售,http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201306090014-1.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
15.Shih, Hsiu-chuan(20130410)。Beijing Should not 'push political talks'。  new window
16.Mearsheimer, John J.(2013)。Say Goodbye to Taiwan,http://nationalinterest.org/article/say-goodbye-taiwan-9931。  new window
17.Simeone, Nick(20140225)。DoD Asia Policy Nominee Encourage Close Watch on China,http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121721。  new window
18.Thim, Michael(20131023)。Unofficially Official: The U.S. Rebalance to Asia-Pacific and the U.S.-Japan-Taiwan alliance,http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121721。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brown, Seyom(1994)。World Interests and the Changing Dimensions of Security。World Security: Challenges for a New Century。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
2.Booth, Ken(2005)。Introduction。Critical Security Studies and World Politics。London:Lynne Rienner Publishers。  new window
3.Booth, Ken(1991)。Introduction The Interregnum: World Politics in Transition。New Thinking about Strategy and International Security。New London:Harper Collins Academic。  new window
4.Adler, Emanuel(1991)。Seasons of Peace: Progress in Postwar International Security。Progress in Post war International Relations。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
5.Knorr, Klause(1973)。National Security Studies: Scope and Structure of the Field。National Security and American Society: Theory, Process and Policy。Manhattan。  new window
6.Dunn, David J.(1991)。Peace Research versus Strategic Studies。New Thinking about Strategy and International Security。Harper Collins Academic。  new window
7.Gray, Colin S.(1994)。New Directions for Strategic Studies: How Can Theory Help Practice?。Strategic Studies in a Changing World: Global, Regional and Australian Perspectives。Canberra:The Australia National University。  new window
8.Johansen, Robert C.(1994)。Building World Security: The Need for Strengthened International Institutions。World Security: Challenges for a New Century。New York:St. Martin's Press。  new window
9.Salmon, Trevor C.(1996)。The Nature of International Security。International Security in the Modern World。Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
10.The National Institute for Defense Studies(2013)。China: The 18th Party Congress Focuses on the Next Generation of Leadership。East Asian Strategic Review 2013。Japan:The National Institute for Defense Studies。  new window
11.Midlarsky, Manus I.(2000)。Identity and International Conflict。Handbook of War Studies。Michigan:Michigan University Press。  new window
12.Mahnken, Thomas G. & James R. FitzSimonds(2009)。Officer attitudes toward the revolution in military affairs。Military Transformation and Strategy: Revolutions in Military Affairs and Small States。New York:Routledge。  new window
13.Loo, Bernard(2009)。Introduction: revolution in military affairs--theory and applicability to small states。Military Transformation and Strategy: Revolutions in Military Affairs and Small States。New York:Routledge。  new window
14.Thomas, Caroline(1996)。Third World Security。International Security in the Modern World。Hampshire:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
15.Williams, Paul D.(2013)。Security Studies: An Introduction。Security Studies: An Introduction。New York:Routledge。  new window
16.董立文(2008)。兩岸外交休兵對兩岸關係之影響。兩岸外交休兵新思維。臺北:遠景基金會。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊開煌(2008)。北京當局因應外交休兵可能作為。兩岸外交休兵新思維。臺北:遠景基金會。  延伸查詢new window
18.Katzenstein, P. J.、Katzenstein, Peter(1996)。Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York, NY:Columbia University Press。  new window
19.Smoke, Richard(1975)。National Security Affairs。Handbook of Political Science: International Politics。Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE