:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:婚姻暴力加害人處遇成效評估研究之初探
書刊名:亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊
作者:陳怡青李維庭張紀薇李美珍
作者(外文):Chen, Yi-chingLee, Wei-tingChang, Chi-weiLee, Mei-chen
出版日期:2012
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁17-53
主題關鍵詞:家庭暴力加害人處遇方案成效評估Domestic violenceDomestic offenderIntervention programEffectiveness evaluation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:63
目的:本研究目的在初步探討家庭暴力加害人的處遇成效。方法:本研究採調查法,透過自陳量表,了解處遇工作者、加害人、被害人對家庭暴力行為進行不同面向的了解。結果:在處遇方案的執行面而言,多以「社會-文化」及「以家庭為基礎的成因理論」為處遇方案的基礎,但核心主題的呈現上,則亦重視個人層面的介入,包括認知行為、情緒疏導等。在暴力行為改變方面,加害人自陳暴力控制次數顯著降低。經加害人處遇之後,被害人的生活品質亦有改善。結論:雖然施暴者使用暴力的次數降低,但本研究發現加害人與被害者對暴力與控制的自陳並不一致,因此仍需進一步探討雙方觀點的分歧與加害人暴力自陳的淡化或否認現象。本研究因抽樣方法的限制,研究結果不建議做推論之用。
Background: To explore the treatment effectiveness of intervention program on marital violence offender. Methods: Survey method was used through self-report questionnaire aiming at understanding of workers, violence offenders, and victims in view of domestic violence in marriage. Results: In the executive level of the intervention programs, a theoretical basis of ”social-cultural” and ”family based attribution theory” were applied, while in the presentation of central themes, individual intervention was also emphasized, including cognitive-behavioral and emotional ventilation techniques. In view of the change in violence, significant decrease in frequency of violence was noted, and the change was more significant than the frequency of control. After the intervention programs, the victims' quality of life was improved. Conclusion: Despite the fact that the batters decrease the frequency of violence, this study also revealed discrepancy between the self-reports of violence offenders and victims. Further exploration of the presence of minimization and denial phenomena by violence offenders was needed. The findings of this study should be interpreted with caution due to the limitation of sampling.
期刊論文
1.陳怡青(20120300)。方案評估方法在家庭暴力加害人處遇成效評估研究的運用。社區發展季刊,137,312-324。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.韋愛梅(20100700)。臺灣刑事司法系統對家庭暴力的回應與現況。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,6(1),135-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.章光明(2008)。美國四十年來的警政策略與刑事政策:深受美國影響的臺灣警政現代化工程未來取向為何。刑事雙月刊,26,55-58。  延伸查詢new window
4.Adams, D.(2003)。Certified batterer intervention programs: History, philosophies, techniques, collaborations, innovations and challenges。Clinics in Family Practice,5(1),2012-10。  new window
5.Austin, J. B.、Dankwort, J.(1999)。Standard for batterer programs: A review and analysis。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,14,152-168。  new window
6.Kelly, J. B.、Johnson, M. P.(2008)。Differentiation Among Types of Intimate Partner Violence。Family Court Review,46(3),476-499。  new window
7.Mills, L. G.、Grauwiler, P.(2004)。Moving Beyond the Criminal Justice Paradigm: A Radical Restorative Justice Approach to Intimate Abuse。Journal of Sociology and Social Welfar,31(1),49-69。  new window
8.Stuart, R. B.(2005)。Treatment for partner abuse: Time for a paradigm shift。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,36,254-263。  new window
研究報告
1.Jackson, S.、Feder, L.、Forde, D. R.、Davis, R. C.、Maxwell, C. D.、Taylor, B. G.(200306)。Batterer Intervention Programs: Where Do We Go From Here?。Washington DC:National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice。  new window
2.王珮玲、黃志忠(2005)。家庭暴力加害人處遇模式成效評估之研究 (計畫編號:PG9403-0368094000000AU691003)。台北市:台灣社會政策學會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王茲繐(2008)。婚姻暴力加害人處遇方案對於加害人家庭系統影響之探討(碩士論文)。臺灣大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wiehe, Vernon R.(1998)。Understanding Family Violence--Treating and Preventing Partner, Child, Sibling, and Elder Abuse。Thousand Oaks, California:Sage Publication。  new window
2.Kemp, A.、彭淑華、張英陣(1999)。家庭暴力。台北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
3.Buzawa, E. S.、Buzawa, C. G.、Stark, E.(2011)。Responding to Domestic Violence -The Integration of Criminal Justice and Human Service。California:SAGE。  new window
4.Rothman, Emily F.、Butchart, Alexander、Cerdá, Magdalena(2003)。Intervening With Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Global Perspective。World Health Organisation。  new window
5.Vincent, J. P.、Jouriles, E. N.(2000)。Domestic Violence。London:Philadelphia:Jessica Kingsley Publishers。  new window
6.Healey, K.、Smith, C.、O'Sullivan, C.(1998)。Batterer Intervention: Program Approaches and Criminal Justice Strategies。Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice。  new window
7.Mills, L. G.、黃煜文(2004)。錯的是我們不是我:家暴的動力關係。臺北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
8.內政部(2008)。臺灣家庭暴力防治大事紀。內政部。  延伸查詢new window
9.Gondolf, E. W.(2001)。Batterer Intervention ystems: Issues, Outvomes, and Recommendations。London:Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.Boonzaiers, F.(2008)。Global Literature Review: Interventions to End Men's Violence Against Women Partners,http://www.rutgerswpf.org/sites/default/files/Global_Literature_Review-Men'sInterventions_GBV.pdf。  new window
2.Cater, L. S.(2009)。Batterer Intervention: Doing the Work and Measuring the Progress -A Report on the December 2009 Experts Roundtable,http://www.engagingmen.net/resource/batterer-intervention-doing-work-and-measuring-progress, 2012/04/04。  new window
3.Houston, Jonathan J.(2011)。Batterers’ Intervention Program Analysis,http://www.justiceassistance.org/pdf/BatterersIntervention Analysis-April112011.pdf., 2012/04/04。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ford, D.、Regoli, M. J.(1993)。The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters。Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Healey, K. M.、Smith, C.(2000)。Batterer Programs。Domestic violence and child abuse: sourcebook。Omnigraphics。  new window
3.Simmons, C. A.、Lehmann, P.(2009)。The State of Batterer Intervention Programs: An Analytical Discussion。Strengths-based batterer intervention: A new paradigm in ending family violence。New York:Springer Publishing Company, LLC。  new window
4.Schechter, S.(1996)。The battered women’s movement in the United States: New directions for institutional reform。Future interventions with battered women and their families。Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE