:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:自由談的督導團體運作--精神衛生護理人員的經驗
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:蔣欣欣
作者(外文):Chiang, Hsien-hsien
出版日期:2015
卷期:62:3
頁次:頁41-48
主題關鍵詞:自由談團體分析深度學習對話督導團體Free-floating discussionGroup analysisDeep learningDialogueSupervisor group
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:26
背 景 自由談或自由聯想的討論(free-floatingdiscussion),通常應用於治療性團體,以此運作督導團體的機制並不明確。目 的 本研究旨在探討自由談督導團體促成學習的運作機制。方 法 採用現象學研究方法,收集進階精神衛生護理臨床實習中督導團體之內容與學習心得進行分析,督導團體是每週一次,每次150分鐘,共計12次團體。結 果 自由談的督導團體具有體驗與引導兩種功能,分別是由體驗而領悟,由引導而自明。體驗的內容包括他人的經驗、身體的感知、自身的行動;引導的方式是,鼓勵陳述事例、跟隨話題的流動、引發彼此的映照。結論與應用 自由談督導團體的體驗與引導,是經由帶領者的無為而為,以及督導過程的平行運作,使臨床人員產生自發性、創造力、自信心,促進深度的學習,蘊生出實踐性智慧。
Background: Although the free-floating discussion format is widely used in group therapy, the application of this format in the context of supervisory groups has yet to be clarified. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the mechanisms involved in facilitating and learning the free-floating discussion format in a supervisory group. Methods: A phenomenological approach was used to investigate the group content and personal feedback of a psychiatric- nurse supervisory group. The group held on 12 sessions. Each session was conducted once weekly and lasting 150 minutes. Results: The findings identified the functions of free-floating discussions in the context of supervisory groups as: embodied interaction and initiation by handling. Embodied interaction included: reflection on the experience of the other, sense of body, and present action. Initiation by handling included: facilitating the self-narrative, following the lead of the group, and reflecting in accordance with the group. Conclusions / Implications for Practice: The role of the facilitator is to parallel process rather than to lead in order to produce practical wisdom. Free-floating discussion and self-evidence from initiation by handling has the potential to promote spontaneity, creativity, and self-confidence in clinical practice and to promote deep learning.
期刊論文
1.Moss, E.(2008)。The holding/containment function in supervision groups for group therapists。International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,58(2),185-201。  new window
2.McNeill, B. W.、Worthen, V.(1989)。The parallel process in psychotherapy supervision。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,20(5),329-333。  new window
3.Holloway, E. L.、Johnston, R.(1985)。Group Supervision: Widely Practiced But Poorly Understood。Counselor Education and Supervision,24(4),332-340。  new window
4.劉盈君、蔣欣欣(20141000)。臨終照護中的實踐智慧。護理雜誌,61(5),33-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Cohn, H. W.(1988)。Phenomenological elements in grouptherapy: Papers from continental Europe。Group Analysis,21(4),283-287。  new window
6.Cohn, H. W.(1993)。Martix and Intersubjectivity: Phenomenological aspects of group analysis。Group Analysis,26(4),481-486。  new window
7.Friedman, R.(2014)。Group analysis today: Developments in intersubjectivity。Group Analysis,47(3),194-200。  new window
8.Potthoff, P.(2014)。Foulkes and intersubjectivity: A pioneer in uncharted territories。Group Analysis,47(3),268-282。  new window
9.歐美、劉盈君、黃靖淇、招雁翔、李作英、蔣欣欣(20130600)。護理人員在護持與承擔中的轉化--以臨終照護反思團體為例。護理雜誌,60(3),31-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Doehrman, M. J.(1976)。Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy。Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic,40(1),1-104。  new window
11.蔣欣欣、廖珍娟、劉盈君(20140400)。為人與成己之間--面對他者的照護倫理態度。護理雜誌,61(2),44-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Borders, L. D.(1991)。A systematic approach to peer group supervision。Journal of Counseling & Development,69(3),248-252。  new window
13.Giorgi, Amedeo(1997)。The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure。Journal of Phenomenological Psychology,28(2),235-260。  new window
14.蔡錚雲(20060300)。現象學心理學的理論與應用 (第二部份):實徵與詮釋兩種應用模式系譜上的對照。應用心理研究,29,53-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳榮華(2011)。高達美實踐智(phronesis)與道德生命的成長。2011年政治大學「生命與現象學反思」現象學研討會,國立政治大學主辦 。台北市:國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.余培林(2012)。老子:生命的大智慧。台北市:時報。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔣欣欣(2013)。團體心理治療。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Buber, M.(1988)。The knowledge of man: selected essays。New York:Humanity Books。  new window
4.Foulkes, S. H.(1991)。Introduction to group-analytic psychotherapy。London, England:Karnac Books。  new window
5.Benner, P.、Sutphen, M.、Leonard, V.、Day, L.(2010)。Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation。Stanford, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.Schön, Donald A.、夏林清、鄭村棋(2004)。反映的實踐者:專業工作者如何在行動中思考。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
7.莊周、陳鼓應(1999)。莊子今註今譯。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.Schön, Donald A.(1987)。Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions。San Francisco, California:Jossey-Bass Inc.。  new window
9.Yalom, Irvin D.(1995)。The theory and practice of group psychotherapy。Basic Books。  new window
單篇論文
1.Sumerel, M. B.(1994)。Parallel process in supervision,University of North Carolina。(ED372347)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Casement, P. J.(1991)。The internal superviosr。Learning from the patient。New York, NY:The Guilford Press。  new window
2.Leszcz, M.、Murphy, L.(1994)。Supervision of group psychotherapy。Clinical perspectives on psychotherapy supervision。Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Press。  new window
3.Winnicott, D. W.(1996)。Pediatrician with a unique perspective。Object relations and self psychology: An introduction。London, England:Brooks/ Cole。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE