:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:老人長期照顧機構評鑑的現況、未來及挑戰:社工觀點的分析
書刊名:臺灣高齡服務管理學刊
作者:劉家勇
作者(外文):Liu, Hubert Chia-yung
出版日期:2013
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁1-21
主題關鍵詞:老人福利機構機構評鑑社會工作師Elderly welfare organisationEvaluationSocial worker
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:20
社工服務是老人福利機構評鑑指標裏的重要項目。然而,從社工觀點探討老人福利機構評鑑的研究並不多見。本研究期使能在老人福利機構評鑑中找著社工的專業定位,並為未來長照體系的評鑑系統提出參考建議。本研究採引導性取向的質性訪談獲得研究發現及結果。研究發現許多老人福利機構的社工人員對於評鑑工作,仍存在不理解,甚至未能感受到其重要性與幫助性。除了評鑑的細目對於社工人員不夠具體外,更重要的是,它並不能對應出社工專業訓練的具體強項項目為何。目前的評鑑著重在社工專業的「服務過程」而非服務過程中的「社工專業」。建立「以案主(人)為中心」的評鑑制度,考量評鑑對案主及家屬的意義才能真正達成評鑑的期待—提升社工服務的品質。
In elderly welfare organisations, service of social worker is a pivotal item in the evaluation for the elderly welfare organisations. However, there is rare discussion on the viewpoint of social worker. This research focuses on the stance of social workers to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the evaluation for the elderly welfare organisations. In addition, we also explore the role of social workers in the process of the evaluation for the elderly welfare organisations. Finally, we project to show probable contributions of social workers in the evaluation for the elderly welfare organisations. For achieving above goals, this research adopts qualitative research approach to interview several licensed social workers. The findings include: first, some items of the evaluation are not specific for judging the abilities of social workers. Moreover, these items are more likely to judge the form of service in the process rather than the profession of social workers. In the evaluation, there is less qualitative information to show the service quality of social workers. Finally, the clients and their families cannot participate in the process of evaluation and they are difficult to be empowered by social workers through the process of evaluation. In conclusion, to build up a ”clientcentered” evaluation system in which clients and their families' opinions are considered is a probable way to promote the service quality in the elderly welfare organisations, as well as advancing the profession of social workers.
期刊論文
1.蔡翔傑(20071200)。背道而馳?老人福利機構評鑑機制實行之初探性研究。社區發展季刊,119,347-370。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林麗嬋、吳婉翎、翟文英(20100900)。住民照顧衝擊:長期照護機構評鑑決策模式發展基礎。長期照護雜誌,14(2),125-135。  延伸查詢new window
3.李世代(20020100)。2001年度老人福利機構評鑑摘述。長期照護雜誌,5(2),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
4.張信可、莊玉嬪、陳慧珍、林玥礽、徐日妹、詹勝雄、虞善琦(19990200)。以多目標價值模式評估養護機構之品質。醫院,32(1),23-32。  延伸查詢new window
5.Simons, K.、Shepherd, N.、Munn, J.(2008)。Advancing the evidence base for social work in long-term care: The disconnect between practice and research。Social Work in Health Care,47(4),392-415。  new window
6.曾華源(19860600)。社會工作者為多重角色的通才實務工作者。社區發展季刊,34,97-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉家勇(20101200)。老人評估量表之初探--以臺北縣某小型老人福利機構為例。社區發展季刊,132,373-384。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.張淑卿、許銘能、吳肖琪(20100900)。臺灣長期照護機構品質確保機制發展之趨勢。長期照護雜誌,14(2),149-159。  延伸查詢new window
9.李怡娟、王潔媛、唐久雯、郭懷婷、尹祚芊(20060900)。從機構負責人及專家的觀點來探討社區型態安養護機構評鑑項目。實證護理,2(3),201-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.鄧素文(20100900)。淺談我國長期照護機構之評鑑制度。長期照護雜誌,14(2),117-124。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳淑瓊(1999)。長期照護品質指標。1999年長期照護學術研討會,台北醫學院 。台北:台北醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李怡娟(2003)。社區型態安養護機構之評鑑指標初探--從住民家屬、機構負責人及長期照護專家的角度來看 (計畫編號:VGH-92-374-1)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林偉峰(2000)。養護機構負責人對評鑑制度看法之先驅性研究(碩士論文)。國防醫學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.甘士照(2006)。以Rasch評量模式探討老人福利機構評鑑指標與制度之研究(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.NASW Center for Workforce Studies(2005)。Assuring the Sufficiency of a Frontline Workforce: National Study of Licensed Social Workers。National Association of social Workers。  new window
2.Rubin, Allen、Babbie, Earl、趙碧華、朱美珍(1995)。研究方法:社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
3.Nolan, Mike L.、Davies, Sue、Grant, Gordon、萬育維(2004)。老人照護工作--護理與社工的專業合作。臺北:洪葉文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Smith, D.(2003)。The Older Population in the United States。U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Reports。Washington, DC。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE