:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公民個人層次的民主和平論及其在臺海兩岸間的初步檢證
書刊名:全球政治評論
作者:關弘昌 引用關係吳振嘉
作者(外文):Kuan, Hung-changWu, Chen-chia
出版日期:2015
卷期:51
頁次:頁73-92
主題關鍵詞:民主和平論兩岸關係公民臺灣中國Democratic peace theoryCross-Strait relationsCitizensTaiwanChina
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:188
在多數有關民主和平論的研究中,分析單位多為個別的國家或其政府與決策者,本文則嘗試探討民主國家內部的公民個人在民主和平論中的角色。首先本文從相關文獻中找出公民在民主和平現象裡的角色。其次,本文經由演繹民主國家公民反對戰爭的原因,來建立公民個人與民主和平現象之間的關連。最後,本文以台灣對中國大陸為案例,採取迴歸統計分析的方法,針對公民個人層次的民主和平論進行初步的檢證。
The unit of analysis of most research on the Democratic Peace Theory (DPT) is either each individual state or its government and decision maker. This article tries to explore the role of citizens of democratic countries in the DPT. At first it reviews relevant literature to find out the citizens' role. Then, by deriving the reasons why citizens of a democracy oppose wars, the article establishes the connection between individual citizens and democratic peace. Finally, a regression analysis on the Taiwan-China dyad is conducted for a preliminary test on this citizen-level democratic peace theory.
期刊論文
1.Schultz, Kenneth A.(1999)。Do Democratic Institutions Constrain or Inform? Contrasting Two Institutional Perspective on Democracy and War。International Organization,53(2),233-266。  new window
2.Quackenbush, Stephen L.、Rudy, Michael(2009)。Evaluating the Monadic Democratic Peace。Conflict Management and Peace Science,26(3),268-285。  new window
3.Tomz, Michael、Weeks, Jessica(2013)。Public Opinion and the Democratic Peace。American Political Science Review,107(4),849-865。  new window
4.Nelson, Travis、Carlson, Matthew(2012)。Charmed by China? Popular Perceptions of Chinese Influence in Asia。Japanese Journal of Political Science,13(4),477-499。  new window
5.Lake, David A.(1992)。Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War。American Political Science Review,86(1),24-37。  new window
6.Oneal, John R.、Russett, Bruce M.(1997)。The Classical Liberals were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985。International Studies Quarterly,41(2),267-294。  new window
7.Polachek, Solomon William(1980)。Conflict and Trade。The Journal of Conflict Resolution,24(1),55-78。  new window
8.Layne, Christopher(1994)。Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace。International Security,19(2),5-49。  new window
9.Fearon, James D.(1994)。Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes。The American Political Science Review,88(3),577-592。  new window
10.耿曙、陳陸輝、黃冠博(20061200)。Sense, Sensitivity, and Sophistication in Shaping the Future of Cross-Strait Relations。Issues & Studies,42(4),23-66。new window  new window
11.胡佛(19781100)。權力的價值取向:概念架構的建構與評估。社會科學論叢,27,3-40。  延伸查詢new window
12.Maoz, Zeev、Russett, Bruce(1993)。Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946-1986。The American Political Science Review,87(3),624-638。  new window
13.耿曙、陳陸輝(20031100)。兩岸經貿互動與臺灣政治版圖:南北區塊差異的推手?。問題與研究,42(6),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Farber, Henry S.、Gowa, Joanne(1997)。Common Interests or Common Polities? Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace。Journal of Politics,59(2),393-417。  new window
圖書
1.Gowa, Joanne(1999)。Ballots and Bullets: the Elusive Democratic Peace。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chu, Yun-han(2008)。The Evolution of Political Values。Political Change in China: Comparison with Taiwan。New York:Lynne Reinner。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE