:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《宋元學案.慶元黨案》研究
書刊名:中國文學研究
作者:戴秉泓
作者(外文):Dai, Bing-hong
出版日期:2015
卷期:40
頁次:頁87-136
主題關鍵詞:宋元學案慶元黨案道命錄南宋道學大事表Song Yuan Xue AnQing Yuan Tang AnTao Ming LuNeo-Confucianism in Southern SongChronology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:9
《宋元學案》為現今研究宋元時期之重要學術史著作,然其書末有兩篇性質較為特殊的黨案,分別為〈元祐黨案〉與〈慶元黨案〉,此為全祖望所特立,黃宗羲原先編撰《學案》時並無此構想。本文即針對〈慶元黨案〉加以探討。「慶元黨」一詞乃源自南宋寧宗時期之「慶元黨禁」,以韓侂胄為首的官僚人士為了對付以趙汝愚、朱熹一派的道學人士,在政治上進行一系列的打壓與學術上的禁錮,因而產生所謂的「慶元黨人」──即受到打壓的偽學逆黨之人,其黨人與師承偽學之士人,一生皆無法進入官場,取得政治地位。〈慶元黨案〉即整理慶元黨人與攻擊者的資料,使「賢否具見,卓然千古」,並放大事表,使閱覽者可考宋代道學興廢之經由,為觀《宋元學案》者所不可廢之篇卷。本文之研究目的在於討論〈慶元黨案〉有何重要性及學術意義,導致全祖望須特別創立黨案於《宋元學案》之末;又,由於學界至今並無專門以兩篇黨案為研究主題的研究論文,因此本文在論述安排上,首先於第二節爬梳、分析〈慶元黨案〉之成篇經過與內容來源,得知〈慶元黨案〉是以《道命錄》為底本;第三節比較與通行本《道命錄》之異同;第四節則結合前二前之分析,進一步探討〈慶元黨案〉之學術意義與價值;最末於第五節中,指出〈慶元黨案〉本身之局限問題。希冀透過對〈慶元黨案〉較為完整的初步探討,能對後續之研究有所裨益
Song Yuan Xue An is the significant book for researchers to probe into the Chinese academic history of Song and Yuan dynasties. However, the property of its two chapters--"Yuan You Tang An" and "Qing Yuan Tang An"—are different from the others, which were created by Quan Zuwang originally and particularly. "Qing Yuan Tang," a phrase from the party prohibitions during the "Qing Yuan" period, referred to some Neo-Confucians like Zhao Ruyu and Zhu Xi who were persecuted by the officialdom with Han Tuojou as a leader. "Qing Yuan Tang An" as the name implies, recorded the information of "Qing Yuan Tang" and the attackers, trying to manifest good and evil, and chosen to present this history in the form of "chronology" in order to make the trace of historical development more clear to readers. That is, it's the important chapter that shall not be overlooked when dipping into Song Yuan Xue An. This paper focuses on the text of "Qing Yuan Tang An," discussing its academic importance and value which resulted Quan Zuwang in creating the chapter in particular. In addition, with the lack of related researches on the chapter, this paper rearranged and analyzed the text and the process of the formation of "Qing Yuan Tang An" in the section two, finding that the chapter was based on the text of Tao Ming Lu; compared "Qing Yuan Tang An" with the prevailing version of Tao Ming Lu in the section three; further researched on the academic importance and value "Qing Yuan Tang An" via previous sections in the section four; pointed out the limits and problems of "Qing Yuan Tang An" itself in the section five. Via a relatively complete research on "Qing Yuan Tang An," this paper hopes to benefit the following researches on it
期刊論文
1.孫國棟(19590800)。唐宋之際社會門第之消融。新亞學報,4(1),211-304+左7-左8。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.夏長樸(20110600)。「發六百年來儒林所不及知者」--全祖望續補《宋元學案》的學術史意義。臺大中文學報,34,305-347。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.魏千鈞(2006)。顧棟高《春秋大事表》研究(碩士論文)。臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.林益勝(1970)。慶元黨案之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李心傳(1981)。道命錄。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.李心傳、楊世文(2009)。道命錄。成都:四川大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.真德秀(2006)。西山文集。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.樵川樵叟(200610)。慶元黨禁。北京:北京圖書館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.王梓材、馮雲濠、沈芝盈、梁運華(201201)。宋元學案補遺。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.姚瀛艇(199512)。宋代文化史。臺北:雲龍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.岳珂、吳企明(1997)。桯史。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉紹翁、沈錫麟、馮惠民(1997)。四朝聞見錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.永瑢、紀昀(1983)。四庫全書總目。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
10.周密、張茂鵬(2004)。齊東野語。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.李心傳(2000)。建炎以來朝野雜記。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃宗羲、全祖望、王梓材、馮雲濠、陳金生、梁運華(1986)。宋元學案。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.余英時(2011)。朱熹的歷史世界。北京:生活・讀書・新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
14.脫脫(1978)。宋史。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.楊萬里、辛更儒(2007)。楊萬里集箋校。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.李弘祺(1980)。宋代教育散論。東昇。  延伸查詢new window
17.顧棟高、吳樹平、李解民(1993)。春秋大事表。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.謝康倫、何冠環(199505)。論偽學之禁。宋史論文選集。臺北:國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
2.夏長樸(200607)。從李心傳《道命錄》論宋代道學的成立與發展。宋史研究集。臺北:新文豐出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE