:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:2017臺北世界大學運動會門票及紀念商品之願付價格與偏好種類
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:張智鈞戴遐齡 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Chih-chunTai, Hsia-ling
出版日期:2015
卷期:17:4
頁次:頁403-413
主題關鍵詞:購買意願門票定價焦點團體討論法Purchasing intentionTicket pricingFocus group discussion method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:19
臺北市將於2017年舉辦第29屆世界大學運動會。本研究目的是探討「門票」與「紀念商品」的願付價格與偏好種類。以「焦點團體討論法」針對重要利害關係人進行訪談。由研究結果可知,不論何種身分,在門票願付價格以「分階段」比賽項目高於「一票到底」、「有中華隊」高於「沒有中華隊」、「男子組」高於「女子組」,另外,「開、閉幕典禮」高於「一般賽事」;若針對不同身分,則「一般民眾」及「協會代表」在各類項目願付價格均高於「學生」;在紀念商品部分,不論何種身分,皆偏好選擇一般常見的類別,願付價格則依不同身分有所差別,但強調其特殊意義且與賽事精神相契合,並具實用性及收藏價值。本研究結論:國內民眾願意付費購票的運動項目,比較傾向於有本國隊伍參與或是具有高技術性兼具美感的賽場,如跳水、體操;具有表演性質之開閉幕典禮,以及較受歡迎的棒球與籃球決賽,可吸引民眾付費前往觀賞,但在願付價格依個人收入有明顯落差。
Taipei City will host the 29th Summer Universiade in 2017. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptable price and preferable items of ticket and souvenir. This study used “focus group discussion” method to interview specific stakeholders. The results showed that regardless of the identity category, “the ticket for single event” is more popular than the “one package ticket for all.” Moreover, “event with domestic team” is more popular than “event without domestic team.” For the gender, “men’s event” is more popular than the “women’s event,” while “opening and closing ceremony” is more popular than “general sport events.” For the payments, “the general public” and “federations representatives” are willing to pay more than the “students.” The most important considerations for purchasing souvenir are more associated with whether it is symbolically connected with this event, practical in use, and collective value. The major conclusions of this study are: (1) Participation of domestic team will affect the preference of audiences to buy the ticket. High-tech events, such as diving and gymnastics or aesthetic events, such as opening and closing ceremony with energetic performance, along with popular baseball and basketball finals can attract more people to pay and watch. (2) Personal income could be another factor to determine the acceptable price.
期刊論文
1.黃煜、魏文聰(20070900)。中華職業棒球球團門票定價類型之研究。體育學報,40(3),101-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.方佩欣(20090200)。城市運動行銷的策略分析。大專體育,100,82-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Chanavat, N.、Desbordes, M.(2014)。Towards the regulation and restriction of ambush marketing? The first truly social and digital mega sports event: Olympic Games, London 2012。International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship,15(3),151-160。  new window
4.Buhler, A.、Heffeman, T.、Hewson, P.(2007)。The soccer club-sponsor relationship: identifying the critical variables for success。International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship,8(4),291-309。  new window
5.陳成業(20090900)。美國職業運動組織票房行銷策略探討。中華體育季刊,23(3)=90,132-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.史靜琤、莫顯昆、孫振球(2012)。量表編制中內容效度指數的應用。中南大學學報(醫學版),37(2),152-155。  延伸查詢new window
7.余民寧(19930900)。次序性評定資料的信度分析和因素分析。教育與心理研究,16,1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.葛幸幸、劉素梅(2008)。奧運會門票訂價與銷售的多維審視。武漢體育學報,42(7),59-63。  延伸查詢new window
9.Anderson, L. F.、Littrell, M. A.(1995)。Souvenirpurchase behavior of women tourists。Annals of Tourism Research,22(2),328-348。  new window
10.Green, B. C.、Costa, C. A.、Fitzgerald, M.(2003)。Marketing the host city: Analyzing exposure generated by a sport event。International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship,4(4),335-353。  new window
11.Kendall, M. G.、Smith, B. B.(1939)。The problem of m rankings。The Annals of Mathematical Statistics,10(3),275-287。  new window
12.Tranter, P. J.、Lowes, M.(2009)。The crucial "where" of motorsport marketing: Is motorsport now "a race out of place"?。International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship,11(1),60-79。  new window
13.Hambleton, R. K.、Swaminathan, H.、Algina, J.、Coulson, D. B.(1978)。Criterion-referenced testing and measurement: A review of technical issues and developments。Review of Educational Research,48(1),1-47。  new window
14.Polit, Denise F.、Beck, Cheryl Tatano、Owen, Steven V.(2007)。Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations。Research in Nursing and Health,30(4),459-467。  new window
15.蔡翔証(20070800)。中華職棒大聯盟現場觀賞潛在顧客未消費行為導因之研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,5,277-297。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Tiberius, R.(2001)。Making sense and making use of feedback from focus groups。New Directions for Teaching and Learning,87,63-75。  new window
17.Wibeck, V.、Dahlgren, M. A.、Öberg, G.(2007)。Learning in focus groups: An analytical dimension for enhancing focus group research。Qualitative Research,7(2),249-267。  new window
18.Andereck, Kathleen L.、Valentine, Karin M.、Knopf, Richard C.、Vogt, Christine A.(2005)。Resident Perceptions of Community Tourism Impacts。Annals of Tourism Research,32(4),1056-1076。  new window
19.Gordon, Beverly(1988)。The Souvenir: Messenger of the Extraordinary。Journal of Popular Culture,20(3),135-146。  new window
20.吳柏叡、賀湘邦、林房儹(20110900)。中華職棒觀賞者的消費行為與需求彈性。大專體育學刊,13(3),241-249。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Litirell, M. A.、Baizerman, S.、Kean, R.、Gahring, S.、Niemeyer, S.、Reilly, R.、Stout, J.(1994)。Souvenirs and Tourism Styles。Journal of Travel Research,33(1),3-11。  new window
22.Aiken, L. R.(1980)。Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires。Educational and Psychological Measurement,40(4),955-959。  new window
圖書
1.吳濟華、高明瑞、潘明珠、方信淵、柯志昌、孫雅彥、葉晉嘉、周佳蓉(2010)。2009世運會對高雄市整體社會發展影響之研究。高雄市:高雄市政府研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.財團法人2009年世界運動會組織委員會基金會(2009)。2009世界運動會成果報告專書。高雄市:財團法人2009年世界運動會組織委員會基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Denzin, Norman K.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(2000)。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。  new window
4.蘇維杉(2007)。運動產業概論。揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.臺北市政府體育局(2013)。臺北市為什麼要申辦世界大學運動會?,http://sports.gov.taipei/ct.asp?xItem=40551466&ctNode=34659&mp=104061, 2015/05/27。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE