:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:文本作為探究支配關係的中介:以外籍居家看護聘僱需求評估為例
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:梁莉芳
作者(外文):Liang, Li-fang
出版日期:2016
卷期:102
頁次:頁115-141
主題關鍵詞:建制民族誌文本支配關係外籍看護需求評估Institutional ethnographyTextRuling relationsMigrant care workersNeeds assessment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:352
加拿大女性主義社會學家Dorothy Smith是當代北美重要的社會理論家之一,她所發展的建制民族誌(Institutional ethnography),不僅是一種研究方法,更是另一種社會學。不同於發展理論或修正理論的知識生產途徑,建制民族誌的探究紮根於人們每日每夜具體的、進行中的活動和經驗,進一步追溯和闡明跨地跨時協作的社會關係,如何編派和影響特定的在地經驗,以達到支配關係治理的目標。以「外籍居家看護聘僱評估研究」為例,本文討論建制民族誌的方法論與研究設計, 特別是建制民族誌如何運用文本進行經驗性的探究。文本對建制民族誌的探究極為重要且關鍵。不同於其他質性研究將文本本身視為單獨分析的實證材料,建制民族誌學者關注文本如何連結個人活動和建制的社會關係。文本不僅呈現日常生活的活動如何進行和協作,更是組織和勾連不同在地場域的社會關係的中介。透過研究發現的呈現,我指出建制民族誌對社會生活的理解不是分類、詮釋或是建立理論,而是藉由對聘僱評估過程的描述,闡明以文本為中介,跨地跨時運作的建制關係,對個人在地經驗的形塑和影響。
Institutional ethnography is not only a research method, but is an alternative sociology. Its investigation is anchored in the actual experiences of people’s everyday life, and then moves further to trace how the trans-local social relations organize and impact the particular local experiences to achieve the goal of governance. Using the research on evaluation on live-in migrant care workers’ employment as the example, this article discusses the methodology and research design of institutional ethnography; especially how the utilization of text as an investigative tool. Different from the other qualitative methods, which regard text itself as the analytical materials, institutional ethnographers focus on how text connects individual’s activity to institutional relations. In the discussion of research findings, I point out that the goal of institutional ethnography is not to categorize and interpret individual’s experiences or build upon theories. Instead, through describing the processes of evaluation, the research explicates how the textual-mediated social relations shape and influence people’s lived experiences.
期刊論文
1.陳正芬(20111200)。管理或剝削?家庭外籍看護工雇主的生存之道。臺灣社會研究,85,89-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林昱瑄(20120900)。建制民族誌作為揭露統治關係的途徑:以大學教師評鑑制度為例。新批判,1,1-39。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭姵妤(20140800)。阿珠上班去:建制論述中消失的「人」。社會分析,9,151-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Liang, L. F.(2013)。State and medicalization of care needs: Migrant care labor policy in Taiwan。Journal of Intimacy and Public Sphere,2(1),82-94。  new window
5.Liang, L. F.(2015)。The distortion of care needs and medical professionalism: The ruling practices of migrant labor policy in Taiwan。Journal of Aging Studies,34,29-37。  new window
6.馬財專、王慧鈺(20100700)。外籍家庭看護工違法使用狀況之探討。就業安全,9(1),122-129。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cheng, Shu-ju Ada(1996)。Migrant Women Domestic Workers in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan: A Comparative Analysis。Asian and Pacific Migration Journal,5(1),139-152。  new window
8.Mahoney, F. I.、Barthel, D. W.(1965)。Functional Evaluation: the Barthel index。Maryland State Medical Journal,14(2),61-65。  new window
9.胡幼慧、王孝仙、郭淑珍(19950700)。家人照護失能老人的困境:一項質化與量化整合的研究。公共衛生,22(2),99-113。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林昱瑄、梁莉芳(2010)。Gendering academic work; gendering the ideology of neoliberalism。女學會年會,女學會主辦 (會議日期: 10月2日)。屏東:屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳正芬、呂寶靜(2002)。社區照護資源網絡之發展:以建構長期照護體系先導計畫實驗社區計畫為例。《挑戰與躍升:打造新世紀長照護體系》研討會,內政部、衛生署主辦 (會議日期: 10月4日)。臺北:國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳毓幃(2012)。「母乳最好」?:婦女餵哺母乳的建制民族誌研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Smith, Dorothy E.(1987)。The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology。University of Toronto Press。  new window
2.Smith, D. E.(2002)。Texts, facts and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Campbell, M. L.、Gregor, F.、王增勇、梁莉芳、許甘霖、唐文慧、徐畢卿、陳伯偉、陳志軒(2012)。為弱勢者畫權力地圖:建制民族誌入門。台北:群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Campbell, M.、Gregor, F. M.(2002)。Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography。Toronto:University of Toronto Press:Garamond Press。  new window
5.DeVault, Marjorie L.(2008)。People at work: Life, power, and social inclusion in the New Economy。New York:New York University Press。  new window
6.Eastwood, L. E.(2013)。The social organization of policy: An institutional ethnography of UN forest deliberations。New York:Routledge。  new window
7.Marx, Karl、Engels, Friedrich(1998)。The German Ideology。New York:Prometheus Books。  new window
8.Smith, D. E.(2005)。Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People。AltaMira Press。  new window
9.DeVault, Margaret L.(1991)。Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work。University of Chicago Press。  new window
10.DeVault, Marjoie L.(1999)。Liberating Method: Feminism and Social Research。Philadelphia:Temple University Press。  new window
11.Smith, Dorothy E.(1990)。The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge。Boston:Northeastern University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Smith, Dorothy E.(2006)。Incorporating texts into ethnographic practice。Institutional ethnography as practice。Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc。  new window
2.王增勇(2012)。建制民族誌:為弱勢者發聲的研究取徑。社會及行為科學研究法(二):質性研究法。東華股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡青龍(2007)。外籍勞工政策中的勞工考量。台灣外籍勞工研究。台北市:中央研究院經濟研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.DeVault, M. L.、McCoy, L.(2008)。Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations。Institutional ethnography as practice。Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.。  new window
5.McCoy, L.(2006)。Keeping the Institution in View: Working with Interview Accounts of Everyday Experience。Institutional ethnography as practice。Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE