:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:外籍媳婦照顧者與聘僱外籍看護工的本籍媳婦:二者之照顧經驗與因應對策的比較
書刊名:中華心理衛生學刊
作者:陳正芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Chen-fen
出版日期:2015
卷期:28:1
頁次:頁101-134
主題關鍵詞:長期照顧外籍看護工媳婦外籍配偶照顧者Long-term careForeign care workerDaughter-in-lawImmigrant daughter-in-lawCaregiver
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:499
  • 點閱點閱:169
研究目的:台灣當代社會對成年兒子孝道責任仍是期待為老病時與其同住,但傳統上性別角色分工的框架又致使照顧責任實際轉嫁至同住的女性,特別是由媳婦這個「非子非女」的外人承擔。檢視我國家庭照顧的現況,除了與日俱增的外籍家庭監護工人數之外,外籍配偶擔任照顧者的比例亦隨之成長。本研究以媳婦照顧者的觀點,同時比較外籍配偶與聘僱外籍看護工的本籍媳婦之照顧經驗,瞭解媳婦照顧者如何詮釋自己的位置與因應照顧負荷的策略。研究方法:本研究採取深度訪談法,並透過居家服務單位與新移民女性服務單位及鄰里長介紹方式尋找受訪者,共邀請9位聘僱外籍看護工的本籍媳婦,13位是外籍媳婦照顧者接受訪談,訪談進行期間為2010年8月至2011年7月。研究結果:居住安排是媳婦照顧者出線的主因,外籍媳婦照顧者是因為無法搬走而必須照顧,本籍媳婦卻是有能力聘僱外籍看護工而照顧。第二個主題是「照顧競爭」,平均年齡35歲的外籍媳婦照顧者處於照顧幼兒與失能老人之間的兩難,平均年齡48歲的本籍媳婦則是處於保自己或照顧老老人的身體負荷困境。第三個主題則是「照顧提供者與管理者的劃界」外籍媳婦被侷限在照顧直接提供者之疆界內,不得跨越,聘僱外籍看護工的本籍媳婦則需面對資源管理與分配議題。研究結論:本研究呈現台灣當代社會獨特的兩類照顧者,其照顧意願與方式深受其配偶在家庭的位置與資源牽引;值得注意的是,她們都被主動或被動被排除在正式照顧體系之外,期待長期照顧體系之政策能將上述兩類照顧者的需求納入考量。
Purpose: In contemporary Taiwanese society, parents still hope that their adult sons will take care of them when they are elderly. In fact, this duty usually transfers to the daughterin- law, whether she is Taiwanese or a foreigner. In recent years, however, Taiwanese daughters-in-law are increasingly hiring foreign workers to take on the role of caring for their parents-in-law. In comparison, foreign daughters-in-law tend to take full responsibility for caring for their parents-in-law. This study compares the caretaking experience and strategies of Taiwanese daughters-in-law as employers of foreign care workers and foreign daughters-in-law who fill the same role as the hired foreign workers. Methods: Qualitative methods were used in this exploratory study. We interviewed 9 Taiwanese daughters-in-law who employ foreign care workers and 13 foreign daughters-in-law. Data collected was from August 2010 to July 2011. Results:. The living arrangement is the main factor for deciding care responsibility. Foreign daughters-in-law don’t have the ability to move out, so they are required to do care work. The second theme is related to the age of the daughter-in-law and the care burden: foreign daughters-in-law, averaging 35 years of age, face the challenge of taking care of themselves, if pregnant, their children, and their disabled parents-in-law. Taiwanese daughters-in-law, whose mean age is 48, they felt less physically capable of caring for disabled parents-in-law. The final research founding is the boundary between the care provider and the care manager: foreign daughters-in-law can be only care providers, while Taiwanese daughters-in-law need to deal with the issues of managing and distributing care resources. Conclusion: This study revealed two types of care providers, their care willingness, and strategies affected by their position in their family. Implications for longterm care policies in Taiwan for the situation and needs of daughters-in-law as mandated care workers and care managers are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Ingersoll-Dayton, B.、Starrels, M. E.、Dowler, D. W.(1996)。Caregiving for Parents and Parents-in-Law: Is Gender Important?。The Gerontologist,36(4),483-491。  new window
2.陳正芬(20111200)。管理或剝削?家庭外籍看護工雇主的生存之道。臺灣社會研究,85,89-155。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Cong, Z.、Silverstein, M.(2008)。Intergenerational support and depression among elders in Rural China: Do daughter-in-law matter?。Journal of Marriage and Family,70(3),599-612。  new window
4.Dwyer, J. W.、Henretta, J. C.、Coward, R. T.、Barton, A. J.(1992)。Changes in the helping behabiors of adult children as caregivers。Research in Aging,14(3),351-375。  new window
5.Guberman, N.(1999)。Daughter-in-law as Caregivers: How and Why Do They Come to Care?。Journal of Women & Aging,11(1),85-102。  new window
6.Holroyd, E.(2003)。Hong Kong Chinese Family Caregiving: Cultural Categories of Bodily Order and the Location of Self。Qualitative Health Research,13(2),158-170。  new window
7.Ingersoll-Dayton, B.、Neal, M. B.、Ha, J.-H.、Hammer, L. B.(2003)。Redessing inequity in parent care among siblings。Journal of Marriage and Family,65(1),201-212。  new window
8.Lam, R. C.(2006)。Contradictions between Traditional Chinese Values and the Actual Performance: A Study of the Caregiving Roles of the Modern Sandwich Generation in Hong Kong。Journal of Comparative Family Studies,37(2),299-313。  new window
9.Long, S. K.、Alshadye, Y.(2005)。Commercial Plans in Medicaid managed Care: Understanding Who Stays and Who Leaves。Health Affairs,24(4),1084-1094。  new window
10.Needleman, J.(2001)。The Role of Nonprofit in Health Care。Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law,26(5),1113-1130。  new window
11.Chappell, N. L.、Kusch, K.(2007)。The Gendered Nature of Filial Piety- A Study among Chinese Canadians。Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology,22(1),29-45。  new window
12.吳書昀(20111200)。兒童少年家庭照顧者之照顧經驗初探。社會政策與社會工作學刊,15(2),79-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林如萍、鄭淑子、高淑貴(19991200)。農家代間的孝道責任期待:不同性別、世代之分析。中華家政學刊,28,77-92。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃秀梨、李逸、徐亞瑛、張媚、翁麗雀(20070300)。影響北臺灣家庭照顧者喘息服務利用的因素:前趨性研究。長期照護雜誌,11(1),51-65。  延伸查詢new window
15.Archbold, P. G.(1983)。Impact of Parent-caring on Women。Family Relations,32,39-45。  new window
16.Bhurga, D.、Jones, P.(2001)。Migration and mental illness。Advances in Psychiatric Treatment,7(3),216-222。  new window
17.Keith, C.(1995)。Family Caregiving Systems: Models, Resources, and Values。Journal of Marriage and the Family,57(1),179-189。  new window
18.Mossakowski, K. N.(2003)。Coping with perceived discrimination: Does ethnic identity protect mental health?。Journal of Health and Social Behavior,44(3),318-331。  new window
19.Neufeld, A.、Harrison, M. J.、Hughes, K. D.、Spitzer, D.、Stewart, M. J.(2001)。Participation of Immigrant Women Family Caregivers in Qualitative Research。Western Journal of Nursing Research,23(6),575-591。  new window
20.潘淑滿(20040600)。婚姻移民婦女、公民權與婚姻暴力。社會政策與社會工作學刊,8(1),85-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳正芬、吳淑瓊(20060600)。家庭照顧者對長期照護服務使用意願之探討。人口學刊,32,83-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.李淑霞、吳淑瓊(19980200)。家庭照護者負荷與憂鬱之影響因素。護理研究,6(1),57-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.利翠珊、張妤玥(20100300)。代間照顧關係:臺灣都會地區成年子女的質性訪談研究。中華心理衛生學刊,23(1),99-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.陳正芬(20121200)。我是媳婦還是看護工?外籍媳婦照顧角色形成與照顧經驗之初探。臺大社會工作學刊,26,139-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.陳亮汝、吳淑瓊(20080200)。居家失能老人使用外籍監護工之相關因素分析。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,27(1),32-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.胡幼慧、王孝仙、郭淑珍(19950700)。家人照護失能老人的困境:一項質化與量化整合的研究。公共衛生,22(2),99-113。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳志柔、于德林(20051200)。臺灣民眾對外來配偶移民政策的態度。臺灣社會學,10,95-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.王宏仁(20010300)。社會階層化下的婚姻移民與國內勞動市場:以越南新娘為例。臺灣社會研究季刊,41,99-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.田晶瑩、王宏仁(20060400)。男性氣魄與可「娶」的跨國婚姻:為何臺灣男子要與越南女子結婚?。臺灣東南亞學刊,3(1),3-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.胡幼慧(19960400)。臺灣老年人口的依賴結構初探:以老年婦女為例。人口學刊,17,83-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林如萍、張則凡、黃秋華(2009)。台灣與韓國老人的代間關係與生活滿意:代間規範與代間交換類型之影響。台灣社會福利學會2009年年會暨「健康、照護、工作與退休-新興社會風險與弱勢關懷」國際學術研討會。嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.王永慈、彭淑華、羅菁菁、查玲俐(2005)。外籍與大陸配偶福利提供規劃之研究 (計畫編號:094000000AU631002)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳郁芬(1999)。婦女擔負老人照顧與就業責任處境之初探(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.涂翡珊(2004)。女兒照顧者角色形成與照顧經驗之初探(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳宇娟(2004)。少年家庭照顧者之生命故事(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.趙小瑜(2006)。家庭照顧體系與家庭協商過程之初探--以失能老人照顧為例(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴鵬聖(2003)。家庭照顧者就業狀況與其照顧負荷之關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝玉玲(2007)。「道德媳婦」的當代生活實踐:女性代間照護處境之經驗研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.沈倖如(2003)。天堂之梯?--台越跨國商品化婚姻中的權力與抵抗(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳庭芸(2002)。澎湖地區國際婚姻調適之研究:以印尼與越南新娘為例之比較(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.溫秀珠(1996)。家庭中婦女照顧者角色形成因素與照顧過程之探討--以失能老人之照顧為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳奎如(2000)。男性家庭照顧者之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Johnson, R. W.(2007)。The Burden of Caring for Frail Parents。Washington, DC:The Urban Institute。  new window
2.Hermalin, A. I.、Ofsstedal, M. B.、Chang, M.-C.、Hareven, T. K.、Hareven, K.(1996)。Types of supports for the aged and their providers in Taiwan Aging and generational relations: Lifecourse and cross-cultural perspectives。New York:Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
3.Morgan, L. A.、Kunkel, S. R.(2007)。Aging persons and their families Aging Society, and the Life Course。New York:Springer。  new window
4.Patton, M. Q.(2001)。Qualitative Research and evaluations methods。London:Sage。  new window
5.Zimmerman, M. K.、Litt, J. S.、Bose, C. E.(2006)。Globalization and multiple crises of care Global Dimensions of Gender and Carework。California:Stanford。  new window
6.內政部統計處(2009)。老人狀況調查報告。臺北市:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Ezzy, Douglas(2002)。Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation。Routledge。  new window
8.Finch, Janet、Mason, Jennifer(1993)。Negotiating Family Responsibilities。Tavistock/Routledge。  new window
9.Mason, J.(2002)。Qualitative Researching。London:SAGE。  new window
10.夏曉鵑(20050000)。不要叫我外籍新娘。臺北:左岸文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.藍佩嘉(2008)。跨國灰姑娘:當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭。行人。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cicirelli, V. G.(1989)。Helping Relationships in Later Life: A Reexamination。Aging Parents and Adult Children。Lexington, MA.:Lexington。  new window
2.林開忠、張雅婷(2003)。台灣媒體眼中的外籍新娘。台灣與東南亞:南向政策與外籍新娘。台北:中央研究院亞太亞太區域研究中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.藍佩嘉、吳嘉苓(2005)。變遷中的性別與家庭:弱勢與移民的女性照顧者。凝聚台灣生命力。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lee, G. R.(1992)。Gender Differences in Family Caregiving: A Fact in Search of a Theory。Gender, Families, and Elder Care。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE