:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:貪腐容忍度的類型化建構:內在與外在效度的評估
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:莊文忠 引用關係余致力 引用關係
作者(外文):Juang, Wen-jongYu, Chilik
出版日期:2017
卷期:64
頁次:頁37-67
主題關鍵詞:貪腐認知貪腐容忍度廉政治理民意調查指標設計Corruption perceptionCorruption toleranceIntegrity governanceOpinion pollIndicator design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
廉政是良善治理( good governance)的重要面向之一,我國法務部近年提出「貪腐零容忍( zero tolerance of corruption)」的概念,期能打造廉能政府與型塑拒絕貪腐的社會文化。然而,想要評估民眾對貪腐是否真能達到零容忍的境界,在方法論上必須先處理如何測量貪腐容忍度的問題。因此,本研究採取電話調查法,以臺北市和高雄市的成年民眾為調查母體,採分層隨機抽樣方法各自調查 1,069和 1,071個有效樣本,調查資料經樣本代表性檢定與加權處理後進行分析,以期達成下列四個研究目的。首先,從臺灣本土文化脈絡出發,以貪腐認知為核心,建構一組測量民眾對貪腐觀念與行為的容忍度指標。其次,運用類型學( typology)的概念與量化分析的技術,建構貪腐容忍度的不同類型。第三,以整體貪腐容忍度和檢舉貪腐意願為外在效標,檢證此一分類的內在與外在效度。昀後,提出較為簡化的貪腐容忍度測量指標,作為後續其他相關研究之參考。
Integrity is an important aspect of good governance. The Ministry of Justice in Taiwan has recently promoted the concept of zero tolerance of corruption in order to build a clean government and to cultivate an anti-corruption culture. However, in order to assess if the public could reach zero tolerance of corruption, it is methodologically necessary to tackle the measurement problem of corruption tolerance. Accordingly, this study collected and analyzed data from the telephone surveys of two stratified random samples of 1,069 adults in Taipei and 1,071 adults in Kaohsiung to achieve the following four objectives. First, design a set of indicators to measure corruption tolerance under Taiwan culture context. Second, apply typology concept and quantitative analysis techniques to construct different categories of corruption tolerance. Third, use overall level of corruption tolerance and the willingness to report corruption as two external criteria to verify internal and external validity of the above typology. Finally, provide a parsimonious measurement of corruption tolerance for the reference of further empirical research.
期刊論文
1.余致力、莊文忠(2016)。測量與解釋民眾的貪腐認知:臺北市與高雄市的實證分析。公共行政評論,9(3),21-41。  延伸查詢new window
2.肖漢宇、公婷(2016)。腐敗容忍度與「社會反腐」:基於香港的實證分析。公共行政評論,2016(3),42-55。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gong, T.、Wang, S.(2013)。Indications and Implications of Zero Tolerance of Corruption: The Case of Hong Kong。Social Indicators Research,112(3),569-586。  new window
4.Treisman, D.(2007)。What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-national Empirical Research?。Annual Review of Political Science,10,211-244。  new window
會議論文
1.Sik, E.(1999)。Some Thoughts about the Sociology of Corruption--From an East-European Perspective。Princeton University-CEU conference on Corruption。Budapest。  new window
研究報告
1.Bauhr, M.、Nasiritousi, N.、Oscarsson, H.、Persson, A.(2010)。Perceptions of Corruption in Sweden。  new window
2.Hawken, A.、Munck, G. L.(2009)。Do You Know Your Data? Measurement Validity in Corruption Research。School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University。  new window
3.Knack, S.(2006)。Measuring Corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A Critique of the Cross-Country Indicators。Washington, DC:World Bank。  new window
圖書
1.莊文忠、陳俊明、胡龍騰(2016)。如何衡量公共治理:臺灣經驗。臺北:行政院國家發展委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kaufmann, D.、Kraay, A.、Mastruzzi, M.(2006)。Measuring Corruption: Myths and Realities。Washington, DC:World Bank Institute。  new window
3.UNDP(2008)。A Users' Guide to Measuring Corruption。UNDP Oslo Governance Centre。  new window
單篇論文
1.Hungarian Gallup Institute(1999)。Basic Methodological Aspects of Corruption Measurement: Lessons Learned from the Literature and the Pilot Study,http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption_hungary_rapid_assess.pdf。  new window
其他
1.Urra, Francisco-Javier(2007)。An analytical review of Corruption measurement and its problems: Perception, Error and Utility,http://unpanl.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN028792.pdf。  new window
2.OPM(2007)。Measuring Corruption,www.opml.co.uk。  new window
圖書論文
1.Heidenheimer, A. J.(1978)。Political corruption in America: Is it comparable?。Before Watergate; problem of corruption in American Society。New York:Brooklyn College。  new window
2.Heywood, P. M.(2015)。Measuring Corruption: perspectives, critiques, and limits。Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption。Abingdon:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE