:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:盧梭與康德的共和理念及其實現--共和範式到政治創建的比較
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:劉岫靈
作者(外文):Liu, Hsiu-ling
出版日期:2017
卷期:29:4
頁次:頁485-525
主題關鍵詞:自主的自我立法民主共和憲政共和共和理念政治創建Autonomous self-legislationDemocratic republicanismConstitutional republicanismRepublican idealPolitical innovation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:21
盧梭的「民主共和」理論與康德的「憲政共和」理論是古典共和主義轉向現代共和主義過程中的兩組重要典範,本文旨在從規範論層次的「共和理念」面向與秩序論層次的「政治創建」面向分析這兩組共和理論的理路分歧。文中首先將分析兩人的「共和理念」,並概念化為兩組不同的共和範式。其次分析兩人的「政治創建」論述,說明兩組共和範式是如何在有限的時空中創造「共和政體」並維持自身存在。最後,對兩人的「共和理念」範式與「政治創建」論述進行比較,以釐清兩種理論的內在差異以及兩組典範之於現代共和主義的特殊意義。
Rousseau's "Democratic Republicanism" and Kant's "Constitutional Republicanism" are two important albeit conflicting paradigms of the transition from classical to contemporary Republicanism. In this paper, we aim to analyze the differences between Republican Ideal and Political Innovation. At first, we compare the differences in the Republican Ideals of Rousseau and Kant by proposing two different schemes of ideas: Rousseau's "autonomous freedom- general will-sovereignty-laws-republic" and Kant's "autonomous freedom- principle of right-public will-the state in idea-republic". Secondly, we analyze the two different discourses of Political Innovation in order to explain how they create a "republic" and maintain their own existence in a limited spacetime (temporal finitude). In conclusion, through the above comparison of the Republican Ideal and Political Innovation, we try to clarify the differences between these two paradigms while indicating their distinctive meaning in terms of relevance of contemporary republicanism.
期刊論文
1.陳嘉銘(20131200)。盧梭推論戰爭權利的途徑--從共和自由到萬民法。臺灣民主,10(4),93-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.朱堅章(19721200)。盧梭政治思想中自由觀念的分析。國立政治大學學報,26,183-206。  延伸查詢new window
3.Nicgorski, Walter(1991)。Cicero's Focus: From the Best Regime to the Model Statesman。Political Theory,19(2),230-251。  new window
4.周家瑜(20121200)。康德論政治自由:對政治式詮釋的修正。政治與社會哲學評論,43,81-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Bielefeldt, Heiner(1997)。Autonomy and Republicanism: Immanuel Kant's Philosophy of Freedom。Political Theory,25(4),524-558。  new window
6.Bertram, Christopher(2012)。Rousseau's Legacy in Two Conceptions of the General Will: Democratic and Transcendent。The Review of Politics,74(3),403-419。  new window
7.Costa, M. Victoria(2009)。Neo-republicanism, Freedom as Non-Domination, and Citizen Virtue。Politics, Philosophy and Economics,8(4),401-419。  new window
8.Kaufman, Alexander(1997)。Reason, Self-Legislation and Legitimacy: Conceptions of Freedom in the Political Thought of Rousseau and Kant。The Review of Politics,59(1),25-52。  new window
9.Nelson, William(2008)。Kant's Formula of Humanity。Mind,117(465),85-106。  new window
10.Pojman, Louis P.(2005)。Kant's Perpetual Peace and Cosmopolitanism。Journal of Social Philosophy,36(1),62-71。  new window
11.Powell, J. G. F.(2001)。Were Cicero's Laws the Laws of Cicero's Republic?。Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies,45(S76),17-39。  new window
12.Vatter, Miguel(2011)。The People Shall Be Judge Reflective Judgment and Constituent Power in Kant's Philosophy of Law。Political Theory,39(6),749-776。  new window
13.Williams, Howard(2001)。Metamorphosis or Palingenesis? Political Change in Kant。The Review of Politics,63(4),693-722。  new window
14.陳嘉銘(20140600)。「創造出公民,要什麼就都有了」?論盧梭的自由、愛國主義和實現共和的弔詭。人文及社會科學集刊,26(2),175-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Riley, Patrick(1982)。Will and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Cassirer, Ernst、Gay, Peter J.(1989)。The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau。Yale University Press。  new window
3.Pocock, John Greville Agard(1975)。The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and The Atlantic Republican Tradition。Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Korsgaard, Christine M.(1996)。Creating the Kingdom of Ends。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Kant, Immanuel、Paton, H. J.(1964)。Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Moral。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
6.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques、Cole, G. D. H.(1968)。The Social Contract and Discourses。Dent。  new window
7.Strauss, Leo(1953)。Natural Right and History。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
8.蔡英文(2015)。從王權、專制到民主:西方民主思想的開展及其問題。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hendel, C. W.(1962)。Jean Jacques Rousseau: Moralist。Indianapolis:Bobbs-Merrill。  new window
10.Krieger, Leonard(1972)。The German Idea of Freedom。Chicago, Illinois:Chicago University Press。  new window
11.Paton, H. J.(1971)。The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy。Pennsylvania:Pennsylvania University Press。  new window
12.Plattner, Marc F.(1979)。Rousseau's State of Nature: An Interpretation of the Discourse on Inequality。Dekalb, IL:Northern Illinois University Press。  new window
13.Ripstein, Arthur(2009)。Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
14.Rousseau, Jean Jacques、Cole, G. D. H.(1955)。A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality。Dent。  new window
15.蕭高彥(20130000)。西方共和主義思想史論。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Wood, Neal(1988)。Cicero's Social and Political Thought。University of California Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kant, Immanuel(1996)。The metaphysics of morals。Practical philosophy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Kant, Immanuel(1991)。Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose。Kant: Political Writings。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.蕭高彥(20010000)。從共和主義到激進民主--盧梭的政治秩序論。自由主義。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kant, Immanuel(1991)。On the Common Saying: This May Be True in Theory, but It Does Not Apply in Practice。Kant: Political Writings。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Kant, Immanuel(1991)。Perpetual Peace: A Philosophica Sketch。Kant: Political Writings。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Schneewind, J. B.(1992)。Autonomy, Obligation, and Virtue: An Overview of Kant's Moral Philosophy。The Cambridge Companion to Kant。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE