:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:盧梭的公民宗教如何幫助我們理解當代政治生活中的信仰衝突?
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:葉明叡
作者(外文):Yeh, Ming-jui
出版日期:2019
卷期:31:1
頁次:頁41-72
主題關鍵詞:公民宗教的當代理解國家制度信仰憲法世俗主義Modern understanding of civil religionNational institutionBeliefConstitutionSecularism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:158
  • 點閱點閱:8
在後神權政治的當代,已沒有高於一切價值的權威來指導人們的政治生活,當不同宗教或政治信念/信仰(beliefs)對於政治生活的規範產生衝突時,最終無可避免發生信仰對決。雖然主權國家的憲法看似為中立、世俗的裁決者,實際上憲法也是基於某種價值體系來對政治、非政治生活進行劃分,並對政治生活採取不寬容的齊一化。透過對盧梭文本的探索及詮釋,本文提出「公民宗教的當代理解」,主張運用此一新的分析架構,可釐清與評估信仰衝突問題的核心,並發現公民宗教若透過適當的「國家制度」傳遞,可培養公民的愛國心與義務感,逐漸消弭信仰衝突。
In this post-theocracy era, there is no absolute authority that can guide our political life. When different religious or political beliefs conflict with each other in the normativity of political life, eventually, a conflict of beliefs is bound to happen. Although the constitutions of sovereign states seem to be neutral and secular judges, they are in fact imposing a value system that distinguishes the public and private realms and are intolerant of parochial values in political life. Through an examination of Rousseau's texts, this essay proposes a modem understanding of civil religion, arguing that this understanding could serve as a useful analytical framework to clarify and evaluate the conflict of beliefs. The essay also finds that if the civil religion is preached with proper national institutions, it cultivates the citizens' love of their home country and their duties. Hence, the problems that arose from conflicting beliefs would be ameliorated.
期刊論文
1.陳思賢(19970600)。選擇信仰的空間--奧古斯丁異端導正論與洛克寬容論。政治科學論叢,8,147-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bellah, Robert N.(1967)。Civil Religion in America。Daedalus,96(1),1-21。  new window
3.許育典、蔡汶含(20130400)。從宗教團體自治檢討宗教團體財務公開的合憲性。東海大學法學研究,39,1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳思賢(20030600)。多元、寬容與道德學習:憲法與群育教育的美學關聯。政治與社會哲學評論,5,1-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Rawls, John(1997)。The Idea of Public Reason Revisited。The University of Chicago Law Review,64(3),765-807。  new window
6.許育典、周敬凡(20060200)。從宗教自由檢討「宗教團體法草案」。政大法學評論,89,55-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.郭承天(20050300)。宗教容忍:政治哲學與神學的對話。人文及社會科學集刊,17(1),125-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳嘉銘(20140600)。「創造出公民,要什麼就都有了」?論盧梭的自由、愛國主義和實現共和的弔詭。人文及社會科學集刊,26(2),175-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.李永然、高嘉甫(2016)。我國有訂定《宗教團體法》的必要性嗎?。人權會訊,119,15-18。  延伸查詢new window
10.梁裕康(20140600)。「既可怕又謬誤」卻「公正且真確」--論盧梭對霍布斯宗教理論的評斷。人文及社會科學集刊,26(2),219-245。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.許育典、周敬凡(20060400)。從宗教自由檢討「宗教團體法草案」。政大法學評論,90,69-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Beiner, Ronald(1993)。Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau on Civil Religion。The Review of Politics,55(4),617-638。  new window
13.Cole, Wade M.(2012)。A Civil Religion for World Society: The Direct and Diffuse Effects of Human Rights Treaties, 1981-2007。Sociological Forum,27(4),937-960。  new window
14.Demerath, Nicholas J. III、Williams, Rhys H.(1985)。Civil Religion in an Uncivil Society。The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,480,154-166。  new window
15.Hertzberg, Benjamin R.(2015)。Chains of Persuasion in the Deliberative System: Addressing the Pragmatics of Religious Inclusion。The Journal of Politics,77(4),889-900。  new window
16.Marvin, Carolyn、Ingle, David W.(1996)。Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Revisiting Civil Religion。Journal of the American Academy of Religion,64(4),767-780。  new window
17.Santiago, Jose(2009)。From 'Civil Religion' to Nationalism as the Religion of Modem Times: Rethinking a Complex Relationship。Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,48(2),394-401。  new window
18.Wallace, Ruth A.(1977)。Emile Durkheim and the Civil Religion Concept。Review of Religious Research,18(3),287-290。  new window
圖書
1.Kymlicka, Will(2007)。Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques、Gourevitch, Victor(1997)。The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Rousseau, Jean-Jacques、Gourevitch, Victor(1997)。The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Bellah, Robert N.、Madsen, Richard、Sullivan, William M.、Swidler, Ann、Tipton, Steven M.(1985)。Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life。University of California Press。  new window
5.Bellah, Robert N.、Hammond, Philip E.(1980)。Varieties of Civil Religion。Harper & Row。  new window
6.吳庚、陳淳文(2015)。憲法理論與政府體制。吳庚。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Brubaker, Rogers(2015)。Grounds for Difference。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Muller, Jan-Werner(2007)。Constitutional Patriotism。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Machiavelli, Niccolò、Bondanella, Julia Conaway、Bondanella, Peter(1997)。Discourses on Livy。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Sen, Amartya(2009)。The Idea of Justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Asad, Talal(2009)。Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
12.Beiner, Ronald(2010)。Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Hertzberg, Benjamin R.(2019)。Chains of Persuasion: A Framework for Religion in Democracy。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Machiavelli, Niccolo、Constantine, Peter(2008)。The Prince。New York:The Modern Library。  new window
15.Mahmood, Saba(2016)。Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
16.Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers(2007)。The Impossibility of Religious Freedom。Princeton:Princeton University Press。  new window
17.Rawls, John(1996)。Political Liberalism。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
18.Madsen, Richard(2007)。Democracy's Dharma: Religious Renaissance and Political Development in Taiwan。University of California Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE