臺北縣政府於1993年委託臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所等北部五個規劃系所，分別於三鎮市的五處公園推動居民參與公園設計活動，作為研擬社區參與式公園規劃準則的參考。在中和與汐止兩地的四處公園分別完成參與式設計並陸續展開施工作業之際，新店市七號公園個案卻出現了學院規劃師被迫撤離社區，當地居民亦因市公所未尊重共同討論成果而發動抗爭。本文即記錄新店個案習發展經過；探討學院規劃師、地方政府，與社區居民等三者由「合作」到「對立」的轉變緣由，並竑當當前臺灣學院規劃師推動參與式公園規劃所受的限制並提出建議。

　　　　　In 1993, Taipei county Government invited the Graduate Institute of Building and Planning, National Taiwan University (GIBP, NTU) to developa《Community Participatory Park Planning Handbook》. The GIBP another four planning departments in northern Taiwan, then promoted 5 cases of residents involve in park planning activities at 3 differentcities as basic research in this project. While other 4 parks at Chung-ho and Si-zei proceeded into constrction phase, the college planner of Hsin-tien case was forced to leave and the residents broke out aconflict with the city government. This paper describes the planningprocess of Hsin-tiem case; explores the relations of college planner, community, and the city government, which is dramaticlly changed from'co-operation' to 'confliction'; and the limition of participatory park planning which is initiated by college planner; four suggestionsare provided in conclusion.