:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論公民德行的陶成
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:沈清松
作者(外文):Shen, Vincent
出版日期:1998
卷期:25:5=288
頁次:頁406-418+492-493
主題關鍵詞:Civil virtueCivil societyPublic spherePolitical philosophyTaiwan's civil educationVirtue ethicsToleranceSocial justice公民德行公民社會公共領域德行倫理學政治哲學公民教育公民師資公民教材
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:57
     本文主旨在討論公民德行的陶成及其與公民教育的關係。 這是一個介乎倫理學、政治哲學與公民教育之間的議題。晚近倫理學由義務論倫理學轉往德行論倫理學發展,德行的探討遂成為極重要的課題;在政治哲學中,公民社會的形成與公民的角色甚為重要,在政治倫理方面則需討論公民德行,尤其晚近自由主義的政治哲學特別重視公民德行的陶成;至於公民教育則是教育學中十分重要的一環,其中尤其注重公民的倫理教育,主旨也在於培養公民德行。本文一方面要討論有關公民德行陶成的理論問題,另一方面也要檢討臺灣公民教育涉及公民德行陶成的有關問題,做為今後改善的借鏡。首先,本文將對「公民社會」的概念加以界定。進而討論公民德行的倫理性質及其相關的三種倫理學理論。由於自由社會最需要、也最適合公民德行之養成,我們有必要進而討論自由社會與公民德行之關係。進而,本文也要略論幾種重要的公民德行,如寬容、正義、自由與平等的精神、熱心參與......等等。最後,本文要討論臺灣現行公民教育在公民德行的陶成上所遭遇的問題,尤其集中在教材與師資兩方面。
     The relationship between the formation of civil virtue and civil education is essential to contemporary ethics, political philosophy and civil education. We can see clearly in contemporary ethics that there is a changing interest from a Kantian Ethics of obligation to an Aristotelian Ethics of virtue. Both in today's political philosophy and civil education, the formation of civil societies and civil virtues is becoming more and more urgent for recently democratized countries. Envisaging these problematic, my paper will begin by defining the concept of “civil society”, and then proceeds to discuss the ethical theories, utilitarianism, obligation ethics and virtue ethics. We will then try to make clear the relationship between a liberal society and civil virtue. Some important civil virtues, such as tolerance, social justice, freedom, equality and active participation, will then be discussed. We will conclude in a practical reflection by examining the function of today's civil education with Taiwan concerning the formation of civil virtues, with special regard to problems such as teaching materials and credentializing teachers.
期刊論文
1.沈清松(19820300)。科技發展對倫理道德的影響。哲學與文化,9(3),30-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret(1958)。Modern Moral Philosophy。Philosophy: The Journal of The Royal Institute of Philosophy,33(124),1-19。  new window
3.沈清松(19930400)。從現代到後現代。哲學雜誌,4,4-25。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Quinton, Anthony(1973)。Utilitarian Ethics。Macmillan。  new window
2.Locke, John(1963)。Treatises of government, A Critical Edition with an Introduction by Peter Laslett。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hegel(1970)。Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts。Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp。  new window
4.Plato。Republic。  new window
5.Becker, Lawrence A.(1980)。Friendship, Altruism and Morality。London:Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
6.French, Uehling、Wettstein(1988)。Character and Nrtue。Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press。  new window
7.Taylor, Charles、Appiah, K. Anthony、Habermas, Jurgen、Rockfeller, Steven C.、Walzer, Michael、Wolf, Susan、Gutmann, Amy(1994)。Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
8.MacIntyre, Alasdair C.(1984)。After virtue: A study in moral theory。Notre Dame, Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rousseau(1964)。Du Contrat social。Oeuvres completes。Paris:Gallimard。  new window
2.Keane, John(1992)。Lyotard's The Postmodern Condition。Jugeing Lyotard。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Sprigge, B. T. L. S.(1988)。Utilitarianism。An Encyclopaedia of Philosophy。London:Routledge。  new window
4.(1984)。高級中學公民課程標準。高級中學課程標準。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈清松、楊世雄(1993)。高級中學公民課程中「經濟與社會」內涵分析及其改進。高級中學三民主義與公民課程之發展研究。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE