:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社區居民為地方公共財捐獻的意願:以新設國民中學為例
書刊名:規劃學報
作者:林享博陳鵬升
作者(外文):Lin, Sheang-borChen, Perng-sheng
出版日期:1998
卷期:25
頁次:頁51-70
主題關鍵詞:國民中學地方性公共財條件評價法捐獻意願Logit模型Junior high schoolLocal public goodsContingent valuation methodWillingness to pay
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:41
     新規劃一所國民中學校地,可為社區居民帶來上學便利、休閒遊憩、及居住寧適 等三種價值。由於國中為一種地方性公共財,若要社區居民對於此種財貨付費,常會遭遇到 搭便車問題,即居民不願意誠實透露此種財貨所帶來的價值。本研究利用條件評價法,設計 相關的假設情境,以問卷來探討社區居民對這些價值的捐獻意願。本利用logit二項選擇模 型,並經過統計檢定,可以找出影響願意捐獻的相關變數。統計檢定結果顯示,在以上三種 價值中,影響居民捐獻意願一直出現的變數為家戶平均月所得,且均為正的影響,顯示家庭 的濟負擔能力愈高,愈有捐獻的意願。此外,居民亦會考慮自身的條件來決定是否捐獻。 以上學便利價值而言,家戶中目前正就讀國中的人數愈多或受訪者年齡愈高,其捐獻的意願 就愈低,因為其子女用到新設立國民中學的機率相對降低。願讓其子女就讀該所國中者,其 捐獻的意願就愈高。 由於家戶屬性中,只有經濟負擔能力一個變數有助於捐獻,但其它變數則是與自身利益的考 量有關。因此,對於公共財的捐獻意願,在個人決策中同時有利與自利的考量在內。
     A newly-planned junior high school can bring the following three benefits for community residents: convenience to school, recreation and rest, amenity for living. The school is a local public goods. If residents are asked to pay for it, the free-rider problem occurs. Residents will not reveal the true value of the school for them. The study adopts the contingent valuation method to devise related scenarios in a survey in which reidents are asked to tell their willingness to pay (WTP) for each of the three benefits. Using binary legit regression model, the explanatory variables which influence their WTP can be identified. The statistical test shows that monthly household income consistently has positive WTP for all of the three benefits. Hence, ability to pay of a household decides its WTP. In addition to that, a household will consider its own situation to decide wheter to pay for the benefits. For example, for the benefit of convenience to school, the higher the number of a household's children currently enrolling in a junior high school or the age of the household head, the less a household's WTP for the benefit. That is because its chance to use the school becomes much little. A household willing to send its children to this school shows higher WTP for the benefit. Among the variables of household characteristics, only the variable of household monthly income, hence it's economic ability, is conducive to donation. Other variables are related to consideration of self-interests of one's own family. Thus, a household's decision of whether to donate for the public schools blends both altruism and self-interests.
期刊論文
1.傅祖壇、周濟(19950900)。乘坐高速鐵路之支付意願及時間價值--假設評估法之應用。經濟論文叢刊,23(3),259-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃宗煌(19910800)。如何評估遊憩效益? --旅遊成本法。環保與經濟,26,60-61。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃宗煌(19910500)。如何評估遊憩效益? --旅遊成本法。環保與經濟,23,66-69。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃宗煌(19910400)。如何評估遊憩效益? --旅遊成本法。環保與經濟,22,64-67。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳珮瑛、蔡惠雯、蕭景楷、陳凱俐(19931200)。水質受補償需求函數之估計:封閉式條件評估資料之應用。臺灣土地金融季刊,30(4)=118,65-88。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳珮瑛、陳明健(19951200)。環境污染外部成本推估--東港溪自來水源污染個案研究。臺灣土地金融季刊,32(4)=126,13-30。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉其昌(19930200)。公共財理論評介。立法院院聞,21(2)=238,50-70。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃淑惠(19971200)。都市公共設施問題的財政解決方式。臺灣土地金融季刊,34(4)=134,19-31。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bishop, Richard C.、Heberlein, Thomas A.、Kealy, M. J.(1983)。Contingent Valuation of Environment Assets: A Comparison with a Simulated Market。Natural Resources Journal,23,619-633。  new window
10.劉錦添(19920900)。環境風險降低的價值評估--臺灣的實證研究。經濟論文,20(2),679-695。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Groves, Theodore、Loeb, Martin(1975)。Incentives and Public Inputs。Journal of Public Economics,4,211-226。  new window
12.Cocheba, Donald J.、Langford, William A.(1978)。Wildlife Valuation: The Collective Good Aspect of Hunting。Land Economics,54(4),490-504。  new window
13.Green, Jerry、Laffont, Jean-Jacques(1977)。Characterization of Satisfactory Mechanism Preference for Public Goods。Econometrica,45(2),427-438。  new window
14.Brookshire, David S.、Coursey, Don L.(1987)。Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures。American Economic Review,77(4),554-566。  new window
15.Loehman, Edna、De, Vo Hu(1982)。Application of Stochastic Choice Modeling to Policy Analysis of Public Goods: A Case Study of Air Quality Improvements。The Review of Economics and Statistics,64(3),474-480。  new window
16.Lipford, Jody W.(1995)。Group size and free-rider hypothesis: An examination of new evidence from churches。Public Choice,83,291-303。  new window
17.Kanninen, Barbara J.(1995)。Bias in Discrete Contingent Valuation。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,28,114-125。  new window
18.Smith, V. H.、Kehoe, Mitcheal R.、Cremer, Mary E.(1995)。The Private Provision of Public Goods: Altruism and Voluntary Giving。Journal of Public Economics,58,107-126。  new window
19.Smith, V. Kerry(1996)。Can Contingent Valuation Distinguish Economic Values for Different Public Goods?。Land Economics,72(2),139-151。  new window
20.Groves, Theodore Franicis Jr.、Ledyard, John O.(1977)。Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the Free Rider Problem。Econometrica,45(4),783-809。  new window
21.劉錦添(19900900)。淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估--封閉式假設市場評估法之應用。經濟論文,18(2),99-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蕭代基(1987)。旅行成本法:投入需求函數或產出需求函數。七十六年中國經濟學會年會,161-179。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉錦添(1993)。核電風險知覺與反核四的願付代價。中國經濟學會年會,45-65。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉彥政(1995)。水泥業東移對花蓮地區環境景觀影響成本之研究--條件評估法之應用(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾明遜(1996)。濕地保育評價:條件評價法之應用與檢討(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rosen, Harvey S.(1992)。Public Finance。  new window
2.Judge, George G.、Hill, R. Carter、Griffiths, William、Ltkepohl, Helmnt、Lee, Tsoung-Chao(1992)。Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Economics。New York:John Wiley and Sons, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Varian, Hal R.(1984)。Topic in Welfare Economics。Microeconomic Analysis。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE