美國「分立性政府」與「一致性政府」體制運作之比較與評析_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	美國「分立性政府」與「一致性政府」體制運作之比較與評析
書刊名：	政治科學論叢
作者：	吳重禮
作者(外文)：	Wu, Chung-li
出版日期：	1998
卷期：	9
頁次：	頁61-89
主題關鍵詞：	分立性政府；一致性政府；選票分裂投票模式；在職者優勢；政黨政府；Divided government；Unified government；Split-ticket voting；Incumbency advantage；Party government
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(41) 博士論文(4) 專書(3) 專書論文(1) 排除自我引用:25 共同引用:0 點閱:115

　　　　　自從一九六八年以降，皆立性府型態已成為美聯邦政府與地方政府普遍存在的現象。本旨在檢視分立性府與一致性政府的肇因與運作情形。關於分立性政府的肇因，研究者嘗試提供各項因素以解釋選民裂選票的投票行為，然而迄今尚未發展出周全的解釋。除論述各家學說及其優缺之外，本文亦嘗試提出綜合性觀合，以期得到一較為周延的解釋。至於分立性政府是否導致政策滯塞，亦是學界爭議的焦點。經由分析美國政府體制與政黨結的雙重面向，本文以為分立性政府並無必然導致政治運作的僵局。然然，關於美國分立性政府的肇因及其所導致的影響，皆是值得研究繼續關注的課題。在結語中，本文認為分立性政府的相關議題或許可為我國政治學界研究臺灣地區政治發展的另一領域。

以文找文

　　　　　Since 1968, the phenomenon of divided government at eh federal and local levels in the United States has come to seem normal. This study concentrates on both the causes and consequences of divided and unified government. Concerning the causes of divided government, researchers developed some distinct approaches to the study of split-ticket voting behavior, but none of them provided a comprehensive explanation. In addition to summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of distinct approaches, this study offers a synthetic interpretation of divided government. Just as not knowing the causes of divided government, the question about the consequences of divided government-does gridlock arise under divided government? -remains contentious. By analyzing the dual dimensions of government institution and party structure, I conclude that divided government does not necessarily produce gridlock in either policy or process. This essay also judges how far these political scientists take us toward a theory that explicates the causes and consequences of divided government, and these questions can be viewed as an opportunity to develop and test further theories of American politics. In conclusion, I try to make predictions about the plausible development of divided government in Taiwan.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Brady, David W.(1993)。The Causes and Consequences of Divided Government: Toward a New Theory of American Politics?。American Political Science Review，87(1)，189-194。
2.	Petracca, Mark P.(1991)。Divided Government and the Risks of Constitutional Reform。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，634-637。
3.	Key, V. O.(1955)。A Theory of Critical Elections。Journal of Politics，17，3-18。
4.	Sigelman, Lee、Wahlbeck, Paul J.、Buell, Emmett H. Jr.(1997)。Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government: Lessons of 1992。American Journal of Political Science，41(3)，879-894。
5.	Key, Valdimer Orlando Jr.(1959)。Secular Realignment and the Party System。The Journal of Politics，21(2)，198-210。
6.	Born, Richard(1994)。Split-ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina's Policy-balancing Model。Legislative Studies Quarterly，19(1)，95-115。
7.	Jacobson, G. C.(1991)。Explaining Divided Government: Why Can't the Republicans Win the House?。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，640-643。
8.	Mayhew, David R.(1991)。Divided Party Control: Does It Make a Difference?。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，637-640。
9.	Thurber, James A.(1991)。Representation, Accountability, and Efficiency in Divided Party Control of Government。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，653-657。
10.	Nardulli, Peter F.(199503)。The Concept of a Critical Realignment, Electoral Behavior, and Political Change。American Political Science Review，89(1)，10-22。
11.	Pomper, Gerald M.(196708)。Classification of Presidential Elections。Journal of Politics，29(3)，535-566。
12.	Shugart, Matthew S.(199506)。The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government。American Political Science Review，89(2)，327-343。
13.	Menefee-Libey, David(1991)。Divided Government: as Scapegoat。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，643-646。
14.	Sundquist, James L.(1990)。Response to the Petracca-Bailey-Smith Evaluation of the Committee on the Constitutional System。Presidential Studies Quarterly，20(3)，533-543。
15.	Sundquist, James L.(1988)。Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States。Political Science Quarterly，103(4)，613-635。
16.	Leonard, John(1991)。Divided Government and Dysfunctional Politics。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，651-653。
17.	Cutler, Lloyd N.(1988)。Some Reflections about Divided Government。Presidential Studies Quarterly，18(3)，485-492。
18.	Cutler, Lloyd N.(1980)。To Form a Government: On the Defects of Separation of Powers。Foreign Affairs，59(1)，126-143。
19.	Petracca, Mark P.、Bailey, Lonce、Smith, Pamela(1990)。Proposals for constitutional reform: An evaluation of the Committee on Constitutional System。Presidential Studies Quarterly，20(3)，503-532。

圖書
1.	Fenno, Richard F.(1978)。Home Style: House Members in Their Districts。Boston, MA：Little, Brown and Company。
2.	Niemi, Richard G.、Weisberg, Herbert F.(1984)。Controversies in Voting Behavior。NY。
3.	Fiorina, M. P.(1992)。Divided Government。New York：MaCmillan Publishing Company。
4.	Black, Earl、Black, Merle(1992)。The Vital South。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
5.	Flanigan, William H.、Zingale, Nancy(1991)。Political Behavior of the American Electorate。Boston：Allyn & Bacon。
6.	Hardin, Charles M.(1989)。Constitutional Reform in America。Ames, IA：Iowa State University Press。
7.	King, Gary、Ragsdale, Lyn(1988)。The Elusive Executive: Discovering Statistical Patterns in the Presidency。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly Press。
8.	LeLoup, Lance T.(1989)。Politics in America: The Ability to Govern。St. Paul, MN：West Publishing Company。
9.	Waterman, Richard W.(1989)。Presidential Influence and the Administrative State。Knoxville, TN：University of Tennessee Press。
10.	Burnham, Walter Dean(1970)。Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics。New York, NY：W. W. Norton & Company Inc.。
11.	Wattenberg, Martin P.(1990)。The Decline of American Political Parties。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
12.	Wattenberg, Martin P.(1991)。The Rise of Candidate Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
13.	Epstein, Leon D.(1967)。Political Parties in Western Democracies。New York：Praeger。
14.	Ladd, Everett C. Jr.、Hadley, Charles D.(1975)。Transformations of the American Party System: Political Coalitions from the New Deal to the 1970s。New York：W. W. Norton。
15.	Downs, A. S.(1965)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York, NY：Harper ＆ Row。
16.	Alesina, Alberto、Rosenthal, Howard(1995)。Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy。New York：Cambridge University Press。
17.	Neustadt, Richard E.(1990)。Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan。New York：Free Press。
18.	Keith, Bruce E.、Magleby, David B.、Nelson, Candice J.、Orr, Elizabeth A.、Westlye, Mark C.、Wolfinger, Raymond E.(1992)。The Myth of the Independent Voter。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。
19.	Mayhew, David R.(1991)。Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990。New Haven：Yale University Press。
20.	何思因(1993)。美英日提名制度與黨紀。臺北：理論與政策雜誌社。延伸查詢
21.	Sundquist, James L.(1986)。Constitutional Reform and Effective Government。Washington, D.C.：Brookings Institution。
22.	Rosenstone, Steven J.、Hansen, John Mark(1993)。Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America。Longman。
23.	Jacobson, Gary C.(1990)。The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U. S. House Elections, 1946-1988。Boulder, Colo.：Westview Press。
24.	Fiorina, Morris P.(1989)。Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment。Yale University Press。
25.	Jacobson, Gary C.(1987)。The Politics of Congressional Elections。Glenview, IL：Scott, Foresman and Company。
26.	Enelow, James M.、Hinich, Melvin J.(1984)。The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction。Cambridge University Press。
27.	Mayhew, David R.(2004)。Congress: The Electoral Connection。Yale University Press。
28.	Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。
29.	Ornstein, Norman J.、Mann, Thomas E.、Malbin, Michael J.(1994)。Vital Statistics on Congress, 1993-1994。Vital Statistics on Congress, 1993-1994。Washington, DC。

圖書論文
1.	McCubbins, Mathew D.(1991)。Government on Lay Away: Federal Spending and Deficits Under Divided Party Control。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO.：Westview Press。
2.	Fiorina, Morris P.(1991)。Divided Government in the States。The Politics of Divided Government。Westview Press。
3.	Cox, Gary W.、Kernell, Samuel(1991)。Introduction: Governing a Divided Era。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。
4.	Linz, Juan J.(1994)。Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Differnce?。The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspective。Baltimore：John Hopkins University Press。
5.	Stewart, Charles H.(1991)。Lessons from the Post-Civil War Era。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。
6.	王國璋(1993)。美國選舉政治與府會之分黨控制--八八年大選結果的分析。當代美國政治論衡。臺北：三民書局。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	制度選擇與政府型態的反思--切中要點或是言過其實？
2.	臺灣民眾的制衡觀與分裂投票：GSEM方法之應用
3.	立委選制變遷與選舉競爭地方化
4.	優質民主：美國動態妥協的否決權設計
5.	分立政府與低收入戶家庭生活扶助：1996至2012年臺灣經驗的實證分析
6.	美國總統款項否決權的爭議：聯邦最高法院Clinton v. City of New York一案之判決及其影響
7.	鞏固支持或資源拔樁？解析中央對地方補助款分配的政治因素
8.	16個開發中國家電信私有化的政治分析：以黨派、政府與國際因素為中心
9.	政治現代化與經濟發展之關聯--開發中國家的政黨角色
10.	臺北市選民具有制衡觀嗎？一九九八年及二○○二年市長選舉之比較研究
11.	縣市長的領導力與地方治理--一個標竿學習的實證研究
12.	「混合選制」下選民之一致與分裂投票：1996年日本眾議員選舉自民黨選票之分析
13.	政黨偏好、制衡認知與分裂投票--2006年北高市長暨議員選舉的實證分析
14.	2005年臺北縣選民之一致與分裂投票--縣長與鄉鎮市長選舉總體資料之分析
15.	派系政治下之府會關係：臺中縣的個案研究（一九五一至二○○五）

1.	美國總統否決權之研究
2.	立法院預算審議之研究:2001-2008
3.	政府型態對於議案審議的影響：台灣一致政府與分立政府的比較
4.	台灣政治轉型中國家蛻變之內環境因素分析

1.	信心危機：臺灣民眾的政治信任及其政治後果
2.	憲政思辨 : 我國中央政府體制發展方向之研究
3.	政黨與選舉：理論與實踐
4.	憲政設計、政黨政治與權力分立 : 美國分立政府的運作經驗及其啟示

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫