:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:明初朝鮮「入朝」宦官舉隅--海壽事蹟探索
書刊名:故宮學術季刊
作者:陳學霖
作者(外文):Chan, Hok-lam
出版日期:1999
卷期:16:4
頁次:頁57-93+左4-5
主題關鍵詞:海壽黃嚴明成祖韓鮮李朝實錄Hai ShouHuang YenMing Ch'eng-tsuChosenYijo sillok
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:290
     作為明永樂朝的宦官,海壽之名見於《太宗實錄》一共五則,分別記載他扈從成祖出征東蒙古阿魯臺及出使朝鮮,並在成祖末次親征蒙古於榆木川病卒時奉遺命馳訃報皇太子。 明朝史乘記其行事止於此。 實則,海壽並非漢人,原籍朝鮮,為洪武年間(一三六八-九八)李朝始祖太祖李成桂(一三三五-一四0八), 歷次遣送入明朝皇帝內廷服務之一員閹人,朝鮮稱為「入朝」、「還鄉」火者或宦者。根據李朝《太宗實錄》及《世宗實錄》,海壽曾七次被遣返回本國為使者,或為當朝顯赫之漢籍宦官黃儼之隨員,或為專使,為成祖向朝鮮國王索取馬匹、火者、處女、各色珍貴物料及土產。二人以天朝使者口宣希旨,藉著權勢求索財物作為貿易私貨,貪婪無厭,橫曝肆虐,朝鮮朝野慎怨無已,但不敢開罪明朝皇帝,惟有忍辱負重,供應無闕,影響明鮮關係至鉅。此類史實中土失載,惟見李朝《太宗》及《世宗實錄》,本文鉤稽有關記載為海壽補傳,並為永樂朝朝鮮籍宦官奉使回本國的活動,及其所反映的明鮮宗藩關係作一個案研究。
     This is a biographical study of Hai Shou, a eunuch of Korean origin in the reign of Emperor Ch'eng-tsu of the Ming dynasty (r. 1403-24). Hai Shou appears five times in the Ming T'ai-tsu shih-lu. He was an attendant of Ch'eng-tsu in two campaigns against the Eastern Mongols of Arughtai, was an imperial envoy to the court of King Taejo (r. 1401-18) and King Sejong (r.1419-50) of Chosen, and was the special messenger delivering the death notice to the heirapparent of the emperor, who suddenly passed away in the last Mongolian campaign of August 1424. There are no other records about him in Ming sources. Hai Shou was, in fact, one of scores of Korean eunuchs sent by the Chosen king to the Chinese court at its request in the later years of the reign of Ming T'ai-tsu, the dynastic founder (r. 1368-98). As they groomed and earned Ch'eng-tsu's trust, they were dispatched back to their native state as special envoys to oversee the requisition of tribute, such as horses, prospective young eunuchs, maidens, and precious commodities and native produce. Hai Shou, who accompanied the notorious Han Chinese chief eunuch Huang Yen on several such missions, and headed two missions of his own, was one such returning Chosen eunuch. These eunuchs, however, were despised by the Chosen court. Like Huang Yen, Hai Shou was heavily criticized for his greedy demands for lucrative presents and rude behavior towards his hosts and fellow countrymen, using his mission as a cover for lucrative private trade. The Chosen kings were deeply distressed and humiliated, but had to accede to their requests, else they risked the wrath of the Ming emperor with dire political consequences. A careful investigation into the Chosen sillok ("Veritable Records"; Yijo sillok), therefore, would shed light not only on Hai Shou's career, but also on the vicissitudes of Sino-Korean relations during the early fifteenth century.
Other
1.李光濤(1971)。李氏《朝鮮實錄》,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.王崇武(1948)。明成祖朝鮮選妃考。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,17,165-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.全海宗、陳明崇(19750900)。中國與韓國。食貨月刊,5(6),294-302。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fairbank, John King、鄧嗣禹(1941)。On the Ch'ing Tributary System。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,6(2),135-246。  new window
4.內田直作(1935)。明代朝貢貿易制度。支那研究,37,91。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃元久、陳明崇(1974)。從韓中關係看韓國人的對外意識。食貨月刊,復刊4(7),36。  延伸查詢new window
6.許振興(1994)。洪武朝明與朝鮮半島政權的關係。東方文化,32(1),36。  延伸查詢new window
7.王崇武(1947)。讀《明史朝鮮傳》。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,12,1。  延伸查詢new window
8.孫衛國(1992)。李朝對明貢女考。韓國學報,11,135。  延伸查詢new window
9.周清樹(1987)。明成祖生母弘吉剌氏所反映的天命觀。內蒙古大學學報(哲學社會科學版),3,1。  延伸查詢new window
10.王崇武(1947)。明宣宗朝恭順夫人韓氏事蹟證。現代學報,1(8),22。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳學霖(1998)。明宣宗朝鮮選妃與明鮮政治。史藪,3。  延伸查詢new window
12.王崇武(1944)。明仁宗、宣宗事蹟旁證。真理雜誌,1(2),193。  延伸查詢new window
13.曹永祿(1992)。朝鮮初期朝鮮出身的明使考──成祖朝之對明外交和明使鄭同。韓國學報,11,232。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.青山公亮(1959)。事大と華化――特に高麗朝のそれにつて。朝鮮学報,14,349。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李光濤(1986)。《朝鮮實錄》中之「事大文書」。臺北。851。  延伸查詢new window
2.朴元熇(1983)。朝鮮對「靖難之役」的肆應。臺北。246。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳學霖(1996)。明永樂朝宦禍探索──黃儼奉使朝鮮事蹟考釋。臺北。167。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王伊同(1953)。Official Relations between China and Japan 1368-1549。Official Relations between China and Japan 1368-1549。Cambridge。  new window
2.溫功義(1989)。明代的宦官和宮廷。重慶:新華書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fairbank, John K.(1968)。The Chinese World Order。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.商傳(1989)。永樂皇帝。  延伸查詢new window
5.趙中男(1994)。宣德皇帝大傳。遼寧教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱源、朱鴻(1988)。明成祖與永樂政治。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.丁易(1950)。明代特務政治。北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.張輔(1962)。明仁宗實錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1962)。明太宗實錄。  延伸查詢new window
10.(1962)。明宣宗實錄。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.胡廣(1962)。明太祖實錄。中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
12.Tsai, Shih-shan Henry(1996)。The Eunuchs in the Ming Dynasty。Albany, NY:State University of New York Press。  new window
13.張廷玉(1974)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.王春瑜、杜婉言(1989)。明代宦官。明代宦官。北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.衛建林(1991)。明代宦官政治。明代宦官政治。太原。  延伸查詢new window
16.衛建林(1998)。明代宦官政治(增訂本)。明代宦官政治(增訂本)。河北石家莊。  延伸查詢new window
17.晁中辰(1991)。明成祖傳。明成祖傳。北京。  延伸查詢new window
18.毛家琦、李焯然(1994)。明成祖史論。明成祖史論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.張存武(1978)。清韓宗藩貿易,一六三七─一八九四。清韓宗藩貿易,一六三七─一八九四。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃枝連(1992)。亞洲的華夏秩序:天朝禮治體系研究(上卷)。亞洲的華夏秩序:天朝禮治體系研究(上卷)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
21.全海宗(1979)。韓中關係史研究。韓中關係史研究。漢城。  延伸查詢new window
22.葉全宏(1991)。明代前其中韓國交之研究,一三六八─一四八八。明代前其中韓國交之研究,一三六八─一四八八。  延伸查詢new window
23.金渭顯(1983)。高麗史中中韓關係史料彙編(下冊)。高麗史中中韓關係史料彙編(下冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.曹佐鎬(1960)。李朝對明貢女考。黃義敦先生古稀紀念史學論叢。漢城。  延伸查詢new window
25.Serruys, Henry(1972)。A Manuscript Version of the Mongol Ancestry of the Yung - lo Emperor。Analecta Mongolica, Dedicated to the Seventieth Birthday of Professor Owen Lattimore。Bloomington。  new window
其他
1.(1953)。李朝《定宗實錄》。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1953)。李朝《太祖實錄》。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭麟趾(1908)。高麗史,東京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1953)。李朝《太宗實錄》。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1953)。李朝《世祖實錄》。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top