:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:計劃生育政策話語調控--基於共享話語的政策網絡分析路徑
書刊名:新聞大學
作者:陳虹秦靜潘玉
出版日期:2017
卷期:2017(2)
頁次:23-29+147
主題關鍵詞:計劃生育政策網絡話語聯盟互動Family planningPolicy networkDiscourse allianceInteraction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:1
從1980年獨生子女政策正式啟動至2016年全面二孩政策正式實施,我國計劃生育政策走過了三十余年的歷程。作為中國影響最大的公共政策之一,計劃生育政策歷經各種改革、調整,多方為此展開話語博弈。如何認識計劃生育政策變遷背后的話語邏輯,如何辨識政策變遷過程中政策行為者通過建構制度化的話語聯盟對政策進行話語調控是本研究關注的重點。基于共享話語的政策網絡分析路徑,本研究認為,計劃生育政策變遷與政策網絡結構變化相關,政策行為者通過知識、合法性、權力、焦點事件等對現有政策進行話語調控,爭奪政策話語權,使其話語制度化,這些因素的變化引起政策網絡之間不同程度的策略互動,從而影響政策運行軌跡。
China’s family planning policy has gone through more than thirty years of history from the official initiation of one-child policy in 1980 to the formal implementation of universal two-child policy in 2016. As one of the most influential public policy in China, family planning policy has undergone various reforms and adjustments, multi-subject has launched the discourse game for it. It is the focus of this study that how to understand the discourse logic behind the changes of family planning policy, and how to identify policy actors’ discourse regulation in the process of policy change through the construction of institutionalized discourse alliance. Based on policy network analysis path of shared discourse, this study considers that the change of family planning policy is related to the change of policy network structure. Policy actors regulate and control the discourse of the policy, fight for policy discourse power and institutionalize their discourse through the knowledge, legitimacy, power and focus events. The change of these factors leads to different levels of strategic interaction between policy network, thus affecting the policy operation trajectory.
期刊論文
1.林水波、王崇斌(19981200)。政策論述與政策變遷的關聯性--批判取向的分析。臺灣政治學刊,3,245-273。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.劉驥、德新健、熊彩(2014)。「一胎化」的政治學:理念、利益、制度。開放時代,2014(3),45-66。  延伸查詢new window
3.梁中堂(2014)。艱難的歷程:從「一胎化」到「女兒戶」。開放時代,2014(3),11-44。  延伸查詢new window
4.Henry, A. D.(2011)。Ideology, Power, and The Structure of Policy Networks。Policy Studies Journal,39(3),361-383。  new window
5.陳劍(2010)。加快中國人口政策從非常態向常態過渡--紀念《中共中央關於控制我國人口增長問題致全體共產黨員、共青團員的公開信》發表30周年。理論動態,2010(25),24-29。  延伸查詢new window
6.韓運榮、高順傑(2012)。微博輿論中的意見領袖素描--一種社會網絡分析的視角。新聞與傳播研究,2012(3),61-69。  延伸查詢new window
7.Howlett, Michael(2002)。Do Networks Matter? Linking Policy Network Structure to Policy Outcomes: Evidence from Four Canadian Policy Sectors 1990-2000。Canadian Journal of Political Science,35(2),235-267。  new window
圖書
1.Schneider, Anne Larason、Ingram, Helen(1997)。Policy design for democracy。Lawrence, Kansas:University Press of Kansas。  new window
2.Kingdon, John W.、丁煌、方興(2004)。議程、備選方案與公共政策。北京:中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hajer, M. A.、Press, O. U.(2002)。The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Majone, Giandomenico(1989)。Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process。Yale University Press。  new window
5.Laclau, Ernesto、Mouffe, Chantal(1985)。Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics。Verso。  new window
圖書論文
1.Marsh, David、Rhodes, R. A. W.(1992)。Policy communities and issue networks: beyond typology。Policy networks in British government。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Hajer, M. A.(1995)。Acidrain in Great Britain: Environmental Discourses and the Hidden Politicics of Institutional Practice。Greening Environmental Policy: the Politics of a Sustainable Future。London:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top