:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣職場偏差行為量表之發展與驗證
作者:林世澤 引用關係
作者(外文):Shih-Tse Lin
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系
指導教授:邱淑芬
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:職場偏差行為量表發展建構效度workplace deviant behaviorscale developmentconstruct validation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:7
職場偏差行為(workplace deviant behavior)係指員工違反重要組織規範的自願性行為,這類行為會對組織和員工造成傷害,也會對企業造成直接與間接成本損失。因為員工偏差行為對組織與社會所造成的影響,學者開始重視員工偏差行為的研究。
目前台灣職場偏差行為研究大多採用國外學者所發展之量表,然而華人文化與西方文化有顯著差異,因此本研究之目的在進行台灣職場偏差行為量表之發展與驗證。
本研究主要依據Hinkin (1998)發展量表的作法,收集677項職場偏差範例,經由事例整合、分類與審查後,定出49題職場偏差行為題項,透過329位在職學生的問卷調查與探索性因素分析結果,將台灣職場偏差行為分成六構面27題。
其次,透過383位在職學生問卷調查與驗證性因素分析法,進行共線性、組成信度、收斂與區別效度驗證,確認職場偏差行為量表包括:自利偏差行為(4題)、言語霸凌偏差行為(5題)、影響團隊和諧偏差行為(3題)、對同事態度不佳偏差行為(3題)、違反管理規範偏差行為(3題) 與對主管態度不佳偏差行為(3題),共21題。本研究發現影響團隊和諧偏差為主要台灣職場偏差行為之主要構面。
在關聯效度分析方面,本研究驗證主管不當督導與職場偏差行為六構面,均有顯著正向關係;組織公平、親和性、審慎性與職場偏差行為六構面,均有顯著負向關係。本研究針對結果之管理意涵、研究限制及未來研究方向進行討論。
關鍵字:職場偏差行為、量表發展、建構效度
Workplace deviant behavior (WDB) can be defined as voluntary behavior that violates organizational norms and may harm the organization, its employees, or both (Robinson & Bennett, 1995). It may bring a lot of direct and indirect costs to organizations. Scholars have increasingly paid attention to investigate employee deviant behaviors.
Up to date, Taiwanese scholars mostly adopt western workplace deviance behavior scale to conduct WDB research. Since there are significant differences between Chinese culture and Western culture, this study intends to develop and validate a workplace deviant behavior scale in Taiwan.
Following Hinkin’s (1998) scale development procedures, this study first collected 677 incidents of workplace deviant behavior. After experts review and classification processes, 49 items of deviant behaviors were generated. Next, using data collected from 329 respondents, results of exploratory factor analyses revealed a six-factor solution for a 27-item deviant behavior scale.
Using data collected from 383 respondents, results of confirmatory factor analyses resulted in a six-factor solution for a 21-item deviant behavior scale, including self-interest deviant behavior (4 items), verbal bullying deviant behavior (5 items), harming team harmonious deviant behavior (3 items), coworker-directed deviance behavior (3 items), violating management regulation deviant behavior (3 items), and supervisor-directed deviant behavior (3 items). Harming team harmonious deviant behavior is the main emic factor in Taiwan deviant behaviors.
As to criterion-related validity, this study found positive correlations between the six factors and abusive supervision, and negative correlations between the six factors and agreeableness, conscientiousness, and organizational justice. Limitations and implications of the study results for future research directions are discussed.
刘善仕. 2004. 企业员工越轨行为的组织控制策略研究. 華南師範大學學報(社會科學版), 2004(6): 135-138.
吳孟玲, & 江達隆. 2005. 組織不當行為影響構面之探討-以服務業及製造業為例. 管理學報, 22(3): 329-340.
吳宗祐. 2008. 由不當督導到情緒耗竭:部屬正義知覺與情緒勞動的中介效果. 中華心理學刊, 50(2): 201-221.
杨杰, Nguyen, H.-H., & 陈小锋. 2011. 工作场所越轨行为结构分类研究. 管理學報, 8(3): 403-408.
肖友琴, & 程刚. 2012. 企业员工反生产行为结构的实证研究. 贵州师范学院学报(2012年 05): 20-25.
姜定宇, 鄭伯壎, 鄭紀塋, & 周麗芳. 2007. 華人效忠主管的概念分析與量表建構. 中華心理學刊, 49(4): 407-432.
洪贊凱, 卓明德, & 洪詩晴. (2011). 主管知覺互動不正義, 主管不當督導與部屬績效關係之研究-主管與部屬適配的干擾角色以及情緒耗竭的中介歷程. 中原企管評論, 9(3), 67-92.
席酉民. 2001. 社会经济呼唤和谐管理. 政策与管理, 12: 37.
席酉民, & 尚玉钒. 2001. 和谐管理思想与当代和谐管理理论. 西安交通大学学报 (社会科学版), 3: 23-26.
張守中, 鄭國泰, 孫本初, & 李宜玲. 2008. 反生產力行為的因應之道 - 以組織正義為例. 南投:人事行政局地方行政研習中心.
許金田, & 顏鴻傑. 2012. 不當主管對待與員工行為的關聯性:傳統性與謹慎型人格特質的調節效果. 國防管理學報, 33(2): 49-73.
郭建志, 蘇嫚, & 張守中. 2014. 個人-組織的雇用關係:負向認同與職場偏差行為之研究. 中華心理學刊, 56(1): 31-47.
陳銘薰, & 吳文傑. 2008. 策略領導量表建構及其信效度評估. 臺大管理論叢, 18(2): 63-77.
陳寬裕, & 王正華. 2010. 結構方程模型分析實務: AMOS 的運用: 五南.
彭贺. 2010. 中国知识员工反生产行为分类的探索性研究. 管理科学(2010年 02): 86-93.
黃芳銘. 2004. 社會科學統計方法學-結構方程模式, 五南圖書, 台北.
黃敏萍, 林姿葶, 鄭伯壎, & 梁瑋鈞. 2012. 華人企業組織中的魅力領導:由概念分析到量表建構. 管理學報, 29(4): 307-331.
詹康. 2008. 韓非論人新說. 政治與社會哲學評論(26): 97-153.
樊景立, & 鄭伯壎. 2000. 華人組織的家長式領導: 一項文化觀點的分析. 本土心理學研究(13): 126-180.
鄭仁偉, 陳春希, 袁梅玲, & 李姿瑩. 2012. 不當督導、印象管理與退卻行為之研究-表層演出與深層演出的中介效果. 輔仁管理評論, 19(2): 1-27.
鄭伯壎. 2005. 華人組織行為研究的方向與策略:由西化到本土化. 本土心理學研究(24): 191-245.
鄭國泰. 2013. 人格、組織正義與公民行為對反生產力工作行為的影響:以中華電信的員工為分析對象. 中國行政評論, 19(2): 81-120.
鄭清揚. 2005. 組織公平與職場偏差行為關係之研究. 文大商管學報, 10(1): 75-99.
鄭清揚. 2011. 心理賦權與職場偏差行為之研究. 多國籍企業管理評論, 5(2): 59-77.
蕭公權. 1982. 中國政治思想史: 台北:聯經.
嚴世宜. 2013. 過程/成果導向與員工偏差行為之關係研究-以組織公平為干擾變數. 全球管理與經濟, 9(1): 1-25.
MBA智庫百科 網址http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/

Adams, A., & Bray, F. 1992. Holding out against workplace harassment and bullying. Personnel Management, 24(10): 48-52.
Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2:267-299.
Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. 2002. Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1): 947-965.
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. 1999. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 452-471.
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L.-Y., & Debrah, Y. A. 2007. Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1): 191-201.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1): 74-94.
Bargh, J. A. 1999. The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In Chaiken, Shelly (Ed); Trope, Yaacov (Ed), Dual-process theories in social psychology. , (pp. 361-382). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. 1996. Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22(3): 161–173.
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. 2000. The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2): 197-231.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. 2000. Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3): 349-360.
Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. 2007. Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2): 410-424.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1(1): 43-55.
Chang, K., & Smithikrai, C. 2010. Counterproductive behaviour at work: an investigation into reduction strategies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(8): 1272-1288.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2): 278-321.
Colquitt, J. A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 386-400.
Comrey, A., & Lee, H. 1992. A First Course in Factor Analysis . Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Eribaum Associates. Inc., Publishers.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. R. 1992. Neo personality inventory–revised (neo-pi-r) and neo five-factor inventory (neo-ffi) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Dalal, R. S. 2005. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6): 1241-1255.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4): 741-749.
Devellis, R. F. 2003. Scale Development: Theory and Applications Second Edition (Applied Social Research Methods).
Farh, J.-L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S.-C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly,42(3): 421-444.
Farh, J. L., Cannella, A. A., & Lee, C. 2006. Approaches to scale development in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(3): 301-318.
Farh, J.-L., Zhong, C.-B., & Organ, D. W. 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2): 241-253.
Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. 1985. Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13:141-183.
Folger, R. G., & Cropanzano, R. 1998. Organizational justice and human resource management: sage publications.
Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. 1986. The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2): 291-314.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,18(1): 39-50.
Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. 2001. Counterproductive work Behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3): 291-309.
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. 1981. Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences: origin & evolution: WH Freeman & Company.
Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. 1997. Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gorusch, R. L. 1983. Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. 1982. The effects of leader—member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1): 109-131.
Greenberg, J. 1990. Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5): 561-568.
Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. 2003. Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1): 30-42.
Hair Jr, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (4th Ed). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Harper, D. 1990. Spotlight abuse-save profits. Industrial Distribution, 79(3): 47-51.
Henson, R. K. 2001. Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3): 177-189.
Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., LeBlanc, M. M., & Sivanathan, N. 2007. Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1): 228-238.
Hinkin, T. R. 1998. A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1): 104-121.
Hodson, R. 1997. Group relations at work - Solidarity, conflict, and relations with management. Work and Occupations, 24(4): 426-452.
Hofstede, G. 1991. Organizations and cultures: Software of the mind. McGrawHill, New York.
Hollinger, R., & Clark, J. 1982. Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance. Sociological Quarterly, 23(3): 333–343.
Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. 1983. Deterrence in the workplace: Perceived certainty, perceived severity, and employee theft. Social Forces, 62(2): 398-418.
Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schwochau, S., & Stibal, J. 2003. Reported incidence rates of work‐related sexual harassment in the United States: using meta‐analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56(3): 607-631.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. 1993. Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language (LISREL 8): Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly,40(2): 256-282.
Jehn, K. A. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly,42(3): 530-557.
Jordan, M. H., Feild, H. S., & Armenakis, A. A. 2002. The relationship of group process variables and team performance a team-level analysis in a field setting. Small Group Research, 33(1): 121-150.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36。
Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York:Guilford Press.
Lewis, K. M. 2000. When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2): 221-234.
Lian, H., Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Liang, L. H., Keeping, L. M., & Morrison, R. 2014. Abusive supervisionand relation:A self-control framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1): 116-139.
Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. 1980. Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3): 451-465.
Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. 2008. Personal and workgroup incivility: impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1): 95-106.
Mangione, T. W., & Quinn, R. P. (1975). Job satisfaction, counterproductive behavior, and drug use at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 114-116.
Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. 2000. Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4): 738-748.
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4): 1159-1168.
Moberg, D. J. ,1997. On employee vice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 41–60.
Moos, R. H. ,1986. Work as a human context. In M. Pallak and R. Perloff (Eds.), Psychology and work (pp. 9-48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Mount, M., Ilies, R., & Johnson, E. 2006. Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59(3): 591-622.
Murphy, K. R. 1993. Honesty in the workplace: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Niehoff, B. P., and Moorman, R. H., 1993, “Justice as a Moderator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 36(3):527-556.
Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. 1998. Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24(3): 391-419.
Numally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.
OlearyKelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. 1996. Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 225-253.
Olweus, D. 1993. Bullying at School. What we know and whal we can do: Blackwell. Oxford.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. 2003. Personality and absenteeism: A meta-analysis of integrity tests. European Journal of Personality, 17: S19-S38.
Perloff, R. 1987. Self-interest and personal responsibility redux. American Psychologist, 42(1): 3-15.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-903.
Puffer, S. M. 1987. Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4): 615-621.
Robbins, J. M., Ford, M. T., & Tetrick, L. E. 2012. Perceived Unfairness and Employee Health: A Meta-Analytic Integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2): 235-272.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. 2012. 組織行為(丁姵元審閱): 台灣培生教育出版
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. 1995. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 555-572.
Robinson, S. L., & Greenberg, J. (1998). Employee behaving badly: Dimensions, determinants and dilemmas in the study of workplace deviance. Journal of Organizational behavior, 1:1–30.
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. 2002. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 66-80.
Rotundo, M., & Xie, J. L. 2008. Understanding the domain of counterproductive work behaviour in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(5): 856-877.
Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. 2001. Counterproductive behaviors at work. Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology, 1: 145-164.
Salgado, J. F. 2002. The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1-2): 117-125.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. 2004. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3): 293-315.
Schneider, R. J., & Hough, L. M. (1995). Personality and industrial/organizational psychology. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10, 75-130.
Seers, A. 1989. Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(1): 118-135.
Seers, A., Petty, M., & Cashman, J. F. 1995. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management a naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group & Organization Management, 20(1): 18-38.
Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 219-237.
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. 1997. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3): 416-425.
Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. 2000. What good schools can do about bullying - Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood-a Global Journal of Child Research, 7(2): 193-212.
Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. 2006. The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3): 446-460.
Stewart, S. M., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Woehr, D. J., & McIntyre, M. D. 2009. In the eyes of the beholder: A non-self-report measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1): 207-213.
Taylor, F. W. 1914. The principles of scientific management: Harper.
Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 178-190.
Tepper, B. J. 2007. Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3): 261-289.
Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. 2009. Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2): 156-167.
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. 2006. Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1): 101-123.
Vardi, Y. 2001. The effects of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4): 325-337.
Vardi, Y., & Wiener, Y. 1996. Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework. Organization Science, 7(2): 151-165.
Warren, D. E. 2003. Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 622-632.
Wayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. 1993. The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human relations, 46(12): 1431-1440.
Wuthnow, R. 1991. Acts of compassion: Caring for ourselves and helping others. Princeton, NJ.
Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. 1989. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 353-376
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top