臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：誰會成為公務員：能力、動機與機會因素之探究
作者：王貿
作者(外文)：Mao Wang
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：政治學研究所
指導教授：蘇彩足
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2020
主題關鍵詞：公務員；就業部門選擇；AMO框架；經濟景氣；教育長期追蹤資料庫；public servant；employment sector choice；AMO framework；economic indicators；TEPS
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
我國有關公務員的相關研究成果豐碩，但多數研究都是聚焦在成為公務員後的行為模式，較少關注在成為公務員前，其家庭、學校教育及社會脈絡是如何影響其是否選擇在公部門工作，亦即誰會去當公務員。
在公部門工作，涉及的不僅是個人興趣、能力，同時也會受到家庭、學校教育、社會環境的影響。首先，因為過往研究缺乏公、私部門兩者的資料，以及串連成為公務員之前與之後的資料，以致許多根本性的問題未能完整回答，例如兩部門的平均人力素質是否有所差異？其次，要成為公務員究竟是能力、動機還是機會的因素影響較大？本研究使用「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」及其後續調查，其中包含學生的能力測驗、家庭背景等資料，能夠更全面地瞭解影響選擇至公部門就業的因素。此外，本研究也分析經濟景氣的高低，是否也會影響其至公部門工作之選擇，將資料庫資料進一步納入經濟景氣相關指標後，可以增補社會脈絡對公部門人力市場的影響。最後，本研究運用資料庫中公職補習的資料，初步分析公職補習對於成為公務人員的影響效果。
本研究主要發現，公部門人員於高中職時期之平均認知能力較私部門優秀。雖然能力與部分動機面向對成為公務員有正面影響，但機會面向的影響亦不容小覷。另外從社會層次的角度也發現，公部門拉力不若私部門推力；而動機與經濟因素則是對不同性別有不同影響。最後，公職補習的效果可能肇因於自我選擇而產生，實際效益並不如預期的大。
There has been abundant research relating to public servants in Taiwan, however, most of the research focuses on the public servants’ behaviors, after they became one. Few studies pay attention to the influence of an individual’s family, school education, and social context which affect the individual’s choice to work in public sectors. Namely, what type of individual will become public servants?
The decision to work in the public sector is not only attributable to personal interest and ability, but also attributable to the influence of an individual’s family, school education, and social context. Firstly, as past research often lacks workers’ data from both the public and private sectors, as well as omitting the data from prior- versus post- becoming a public servant, the insufficient data lead to incomplete analysis to many fundamental questions – for example, are there quality discrepancies in the averaged human resources between the two sectors? Secondly, what is the most influential factor for people to choose the public sector? Is it the ability, motivation, or opportunity? This study employs the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) and its follow-up surveys. TEPS includes multidimensional information of students, such as cognitive ability and family background. These data enable the study to understand, more comprehensively, the influential factors of people who chose to work in the public sector. Besides, this study analyzes the relationship between macroeconomic indicators and people choosing to work in the public sector. Combining the macroeconomic indicators with the TEPS database enhances the understanding of how social context influences the human resource market of the public sector. Lastly, this study leverages the information from cram schools for public servants to analyze the effectiveness of cram schools on passing the national civil service examination.
This study finds that the public servants demonstrated a higher cognitive ability than workers in private sectors during senior high school period. Although the ability and motivation factors influence people positively to work in the public sector, the effects of the opportunity factor should not be underestimated. This study also finds that from a societal angle, the pulling forces of the public sector is not as strong as the pushing forces of the private sector; interestingly, motivation and macroeconomic conditions seem to have distinct influences on different genders. In conclusion, this study finds that the effect of cram schools may result from the individual’s selection bias and the actual benefits of cram schools are less than expected.
朱竹青、楊麗華（2011）。論人口成長趨勢對未來國家考試之影響。國家菁英，7（3），119-136。
江豐富（2012）。臺灣公私部門薪資差異問題之研究。中央研究院經濟所學術研討論文。2015年1月10日，取自http://www.econ.sinica.edu.tw/webtools/thumbnail/viewpdf/2013090215154176273/?fd=Seminar_PDF&MSID=2013100215152267995&Cat=2&Pname=12-A012%28all%29.2012111214580846_.pdf
考選部（2016）。中華民國104年考選統計。臺北市：作者。
考選部（2020a）。中華民國108年考選統計。臺北市：作者。
考選部（2020b）。考選集粹自109年7月起，每月於國考APP推播人物專訪。2020年7月10日，取自https://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/news/wfrmNews.aspx?kind=3&menu_id=42&news_id=3995
李仲彬、胡龍騰、陳志瑋、黃婉玲（2019）。潛在文官人才養成的第一哩路：大學多元入學方式的效度分析。文官制度季刊，11（2），27-63。
李佩璇（2018）。上班族夢幻工作調查。2019年12月19日，取自 https://www.1111.com.tw/news/surveyns/112096/
辛炳隆（1988）。臺灣公部門工資決定與其對物價及私部門工資的影響。經濟論文叢刊，16，371-391。
施能傑（2006）。政府薪資績效化的政策設計。公共行政學報，18，51-84。
洪美仁、黃建實（2016）反官僚現象—以公務人員相關之頭版新聞報導為分析素材。臺灣民主季刊，13，45-92。
胡斌偉（2011）。臺灣公私部門薪資差距之研究。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
孫同文（2018）。芝麻掉了？讀〈公共服務動機：回顧、反思與 未來方向〉有感。公共行政學報，54，127-138。
張苙雲（2005a）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：第一波（2001）高中職五專學生問卷資料（C00124_A）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
張苙雲（2005b）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：第二波（2003）高中職五專學生問卷資料（C00137_A）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
張苙雲（2008）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫：第四波（2007）高中職五專學生問卷資料（公共版）（C00189_1）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
張鎧如、陳敦源、簡鈺珒、李仲彬（2015）。探索臺灣公務人員工作績效之影響因素：能力、動機與機會的整合觀點。東吳政治學報，33，1-71。
陳光輝（2019）。教育程度的再思考：大學生政治知識與態度的定群追蹤調查。調查研究—方法與應用，43，45-88。
陳重安、許成委（2016）。公共服務動機：回顧、反思與未來方向。公共行政學報，51，69-96。
陳智華（2014，7月4日）。報名人次6年新低 高普考今登場。2015年2月16日，取自http://udn.com/news/story/6939/481033
陳錫安（2014）。景氣愈差公職考試愈熱門？論臺灣經濟變數對高普考錄取率之影響。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
傅仰止（2017）。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2016第七期第二次：公民與國家組（C00321_2）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
黃婉玲（2019）。為何選擇就讀軍警院校？公共服務動機的角色。公共行政學報，57，83-118。
黃朝盟、嚴秀娟（2018）。公共行政教育是否造就出更好的公務人員？準公務人員的工作信心與公共服務動機。文官制度季刊，10，55-84。
楊孟麗、譚康榮、黃敏雄（2003）。「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」心理計量報告：TEPS 2001分析能力測驗。2020年8月1日，取自https://www.ea.sinica.edu.tw/file/Image/TestingReport2004-2-10.pdf
楊麗華（2011）。從各項經濟指標看公務人員考試報考情形變化。考選論壇季刊，1（1），111-117。
董俞佳（2014，6月29日）。曾排斥當公務員 陳舒亦現超有成就感。2015年2月16日，取自http://udn.com/news/story/6941/481390
董俞佳（2015，2月15日）。蔣禮豪 大三就決定考公職。2015年2月16日，取自http://udn.com/news/story/6941/709427-蔣禮豪-大三就決定考公職
詹中原、陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂、蔡秀涓（2008）。臺灣政府文官調查研究文集（一）：方法篇。取自https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/srda_freedownload.php?recid=2023&fileid=11068
銀慶貞、陶宏麟、洪嘉瑜（2012）。補習對考大學真的有用嗎？經濟論文叢刊，40（1），73-118。
劉正（2006）。補習在臺灣的變遷、效能與階層化。教育研究集刊，52（4），1-33。
潘瑛如、李隆盛（2014）。中文版公共服務動機量表之信效度驗證。測驗學刊，61（1），135-158。
蔡良文（2010）。人事行政學—論現行考銓制度。臺北市：五南。
關秉寅（2014）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查：教育與勞力市場的連結-2001/2003年高中職五專學生樣本2009年調查（公共版）（C00303_2）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
關秉寅（2015）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查：教育與勞力市場的連結-2001/2003年高中職五專學生樣本2010年調查（公共版）（C00303_3）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
關秉寅（2017a）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查：教育與勞力市場的連結-2001/2003年高中職五專學生樣本2015年調查（公共版）（E10259_4）【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
關秉寅（2017b）。從學校到勞力市場：簡介「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」及其後續追蹤調查。中國統計學報，55，25-41。
關秉寅、李敦義（2010）。國中生數學補得愈久，數學成就愈好嗎？傾向分數配對法的分析。教育研究集刊，56（2），105-139。
蘇婉雯（2017）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查（TEPS-B）簡介。學術調查研究資料庫通訊，60，12-16。
Andersen, L. B., Pallesen, T., & Holm Pedersen, L. (2011). Does Ownership Matter? Public Service Motivation Among Physiotherapists in the Private and Public Sectors in Denmark. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 10-27.
Asseburg, J., & Homberg, F. (2018). Public Service Motivation or Sector Rewards? Two Studies on the Determinants of Sector Attraction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 82-111.
Barfort, S., Harmon, N. A., Hjorth, F., & Olsen, A. L. (2019). Sustaining Honesty in Public Service: The Role of Selection. AEJ: Economic Policy, 11(4), 96-123.
Barsoum, G. (2020). Why is the Public Sector the Employer of Choice among Women in the Middle East? A Gendered Qualitative Inquiry into PSM in a Global Context. Review of Public Personnel Administration. (online version)
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560-569.
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2015). Public Management and Governance (3 ed.). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
Bozeman, B., & Su, X. (2015). Public Service Motivation Concepts and Theory: A Critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700-710.
Brewer, G. (2003). Building Social Capital: Civic Attitudes and Behavior of Public Servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 5-25.
Bright, L. (2011). Does Public Service Motivation Affect the Occupation Choices of Public Employees? Public Personnel Management, 40(1), 11-24.
Bullock, J. B., Hansen, J. R., & Houston, D. J. (2018). Sector Differences in Employee’s Perceived Importance of Income and Job Security: Can These be Found Across the Contexts of Countries, Cultures, and Occupations? International Public Management Journal, 21(2), 243-271.
Bullock, J. B., Stritch, J. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2015). International Comparison of Public and Private Employees’ Work Motives, Attitudes, and Perceived Rewards. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 479-489.
Chen, C.-A., Chen, D.-Y., & Xu, C.-W. (2018). Applying Self-Determination Theory to Understand Public Employee's Motivation for a Public Service Career: An East Asian Case (Taiwan). Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 365-389.
Chen, C.-A., Chen, D.-Y., Liao, Z.-P., & Kuo, M.-F. (2019). Winnowing Out High-psm Candidates: The Adverse Selection Effect of Competitive Public Service Exams. International Public Management Journal, 1-22.
Choi, Y. (2017). Work Values, Job Characteristics, and Career Choice Decisions: Evidence From Longitudinal Data. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 779-796.
Choi, Y., & Chung, I. H. (2017). Attraction-Selection and Socialization of Work Values. Public Personnel Management, 46(1), 66-88.
Christensen, R. K., & Wright, B. E. (2011). The Effects of Public Service Motivation on Job Choice Decisions: Disentangling the Contributions of Person-Organization Fit and Person-Job Fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 723-743.
Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public-Service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499-518.
Dong, H.-K. D. (2014). Individual Risk Preference and Sector Choice: Are Risk-Averse Individuals More Likely to Choose Careers in the Public Sector? Administration & Society, 49(8), 1121-1142.
Fischer, C., & Schott, C. (2020). Why people enter and stay in public service careers: the role of parental socialization and an interest in politics. International Review of Administrative Sciences. (online version)
Fowler, L., & Birdsall, C. (2019). Are the Best and Brightest Joining the Public Service? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(3), 532-554.
Goodsell, C. T. (2000). Bureaucratic Bashing. In J. M. Shafritz (Ed.), Defining Public Administration (pp. 128-131). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Hanna, R., & Wang, S.-Y. (2017). Dishonesty and Selection into Public Service: Evidence from India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 262-290.
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1-28.
Holt, S. B. (2018). For Those Who Care: The Effect of Public Service Motivation on Sector Selection. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 457-471.
Hou, J. W. (1993) Public-private wage comparison: A case study of Taiwan. Journal of Asian Economics, 4(2), 347-362.
Houston, D. J. (2000). Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713-728.
Hughes, J. (2007). The Ability-Motivation-Opportunity Framework for Behavior Research in IS. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07).
Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294.
Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, P., Liu, B., Palidauskaite, J., Pedersen, L. H., Perry, J. L., Ritz, A., Taylor, J., & De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the Structure and Meaning of Public Service Motivation across Populations: Developing an International Instrument and Addressing Issues of Measurement Invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79-102.
Kjeldsen, A. M., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2012). Public Service Motivation and Employment Sector: Attraction or Socialization? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899-926.
Ko, K., & Jun, K.-N. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of Job Motivation and Career Preference of Asian Undergraduate Students. Public Personnel Management, 44(2), 192-213.
Korac, S., Lindenmeier, J., & Saliterer, I. (2020). Attractiveness of public sector employment at the pre-entry level - a hierarchical model approach and analysis of gender effects. Public Management Review, 22(2), 206-233.
Korac, S., Saliterer, I., & Weigand, B. (2018). Factors Affecting the Preference for Public Sector Employment at the Pre-Entry Level: A Systematic Review. International Public Management Journal, 22(5), 797-840.
Krueger, A. B. (1988). The determinants of queues for federal jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41(4), 567-581.
Lee, G., & Choi, D. L. (2016). Does Public Service Motivation Influence the College Students’ Intention to Work in the Public Sector? Evidence From Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 145-163.
Leeper, J. T. (2018). Margins (R packages). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/margins/margins.pdf
Lepak, D. P., Liao, H., Chung, Y., & Harden, E. E. (2006). A Conceptual Review of Human Resource Management Systems in Strategic Human Resource Management Research. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 25, pp. 217-271). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who Wants to Work for the Government? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395-404.
Liu, B., Hui, C., Hu, J., Yang, W., & Yu, X. (2011). How well can public service motivation connect with occupational intention? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 191-211.
Llorens, J. J., & Stazyk, E. C. (2011). How Important Are Competitive Wages? Exploring the Impact of Relative Wage Rates on Employee Turnover in State Government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(2), 111-127.
Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67, 40-53.
Niu, L. (2018). A review of the application of logistic regression in educational research: common issues, implications, and suggestions. Educational Review, 72(1), 41-67.
Norris, P. (2003). Is there still a public service ethos? Work values, experience, and job satisfaction among government workers. In Donahue J. D. & Nye J. S. Jr (eds), For the People: Can We Fix Public Service? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Oberfield, Z. W. (2014). Becoming Bureaucrats: Socialization at the Front Lines of Government Service. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.
Perry, J. L., & Vandenabeele, W. (2015). Public Service Motivation Research: Achievements, Challenges, and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 692-699.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681-690.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org/
Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414-426.
Rose, R. P. (2012). Preferences for Careers in Public Work: Examining the Government–Nonprofit Divide Among Undergraduates Through Public Service Motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(4), 416-437.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The Darker and Brighter Sides of Human Existence: Basic Psychological Needs as a Unifying Concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319-338.
Schneider, B. (1987). The People Make the Place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2007). How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 426-445.
Smith, T. J., & McKenna, C. M. (2013). A Comparison of Logistic Regression Pseudo R2 Indices. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 39(2), 17-26.
Steijn, B. (2008). Person-Environment Fit and Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 13-27.
Tett, R. P., & Simonet, D. V. (2011). Faking in Personality Assessment: A “Multisaturation” Perspective on Faking as Performance. Human Performance, 24(4), 302-321.
Tummers, L. G. (2019). Public Sector Stereotypes. Paper presented at the EGPA Permanent Study Group Behavioral Public Administration, Belfast.
UK Civil Service (2019). The International Civil Service Effectiveness (InCiSE) Index 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/about/partnerships/international-civil-service-effectiveness-index-2019#
Van de Walle, S., Steijn, B., & Jilke, S. (2015). Extrinsic motivation, PSM and labour market characteristics: a multilevel model of public sector employment preference in 26 countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 833-855.
Van der Wal, Z. (2015). “All quiet on the non-Western front?” A review of public service motivation scholarship in non-Western contexts. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 69-86.
Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Government Calling: Public Service Motivation as an Element in Selecting Government as an Employer of Choice. Public Administration, 1089-1105.
Vermeeren, B. (2015). Influencing public sector performance: studying the impact of ability-, motivation- and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices on various performance outcomes in the public sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(4), 717-737.
Vogel, D., & Kroll, A. (2015). The Stability and Change of PSM-Related Values Across Time: Testing Theoretical Expectations Against Panel Data. International Public Management Journal, 19(1), 53-77.
Vroom, V. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., . . . Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686.
Winter, V., & Thaler, J. (2016). Does Motivation Matter for Employer Choices? A Discrete-Choice Analysis of Medical Students’ Decisions Among Public, Nonprofit, and For-Profit Hospitals. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 762-786.
Wright, B. E. (2008). Methodological challenges associated with public service motivation research. In J. L. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service (pp. 80-98). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Wright, B. E., & Christensen, R. K. (2010). Public Service Motivation: A Test of the Job Attraction–Selection–Attrition Model. International Public Management Journal, 13(2), 155-176.
Wright, B. E., & Grant, A. M. (2010). Unanswered Questions about Public Service Motivation: Designing Research to Address Key Issues of Emergence and Effects. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 691-700.
Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K., & Pandey, S. K. (2013). Measuring Public Service Motivation: Exploring the Equivalence of Existing Global Measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197-223.
Wright, B. E., Hassan, S., & Christensen, R. K. (2017). Job Choice and Performance: Revisiting Core Assumptions about Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 20(1), 108-131.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：225（臺灣：222，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2446764 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68248013
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上