:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:能力分班、補習與學習成效的關聯:從地域特徵與學校屬性談起
書刊名:教育與多元文化研究
作者:劉正 引用關係楊承祥許湘翎
作者(外文):Liu, JengYang, Cheng-hsiangHsu, Hsiang-ling
出版日期:2018
卷期:17
頁次:頁41-79
主題關鍵詞:地域特徵能力分班補習學校屬性學習成效Regional characteristicsAbility groupingCram schoolingSchool attributesAcademic performance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:520
  • 點閱點閱:55
期刊論文
1.林忠正、黃璀娟(20091200)。補習文化。人文及社會科學集刊,21(4),587-643。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Gamoran, Adam、Nystrand, Martin、Berends, Mark、LePore, Paul C.(1995)。An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping。American Educational Research Journal,32(4),687-715。  new window
3.Cheung, C. K.、Rudowicz, E.(2003)。Academic outcomes of ability grouping among junior high school students in Hong Kong。The Journal of Educational Research,96(4),241-254。  new window
4.彭森明(20061200)。大專校院招生能兼顧卓越與公平嗎?。考試學刊,1,11-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林大森、陳憶芬(20061200)。臺灣高中生參加補習之效益分析。教育研究集刊,52(4),35-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Pallas, A. M.、Entwisle, D. R.、Alexander, K. L.、Stluka, M. F.(1994)。Ability-group Effects: Instructional, Social, or Institutional?。Sociology of Education,67(1),27-46。  new window
7.Carbonaro, W.(2005)。Tracking, students' effort, and academic achievement。Sociology of Education,78(1),27-49。  new window
8.黃毅志、陳怡靖(20050600)。臺灣的升學問題:教育社會學理論與研究之檢討。臺灣教育社會學研究,5(1),77-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Broaded, C. Montgomery(1997)。The limits and possibilities of tracking: Some evidence from Taiwan。Sociology of Education,70(1),36-53。  new window
10.謝小芩、楊挽北(2003)。「能力編班」長期追蹤調查--能力分班無法因材施教。人本教育札記,173,34-36。  延伸查詢new window
11.Huang, Min-Hsiung(2009)。Classroom homogeneity and the distribution of student math performance: A country-level fixed-effects analysis。Social Science Research,38(4),781-791。  new window
12.Schofield, Janet Ward(2010)。International evidence on ability grouping with curriculum differentiation and the achievement gap in secondary schools。Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education,112(5),1492-1528。  new window
13.劉正(20061200)。補習在臺灣的變遷、效能與階層化。教育研究集刊,52(4),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.駱明慶(20010600)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊,29(2),117-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊,19,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.謝孟穎(20030600)。家長社經背景與學生學業成就關聯性之研究。教育研究集刊,49(2),255-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.黃敏雄(20080600)。班級同質程度、家庭背景及數學表現:運用雙重差分法的跨國分析。臺灣社會學刊,40,1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.黃毅志、陳俊瑋(20080300)。學科補習、成績表現與升學結果--以學測成績與上公立大學為例。教育研究集刊,54(1),117-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Borg, W. R.(1965)。Ability grouping in the public schools: A field study。Journal of Experimental Education,34(2),1-97。  new window
20.Dreeben, R.、Barr, R.(1988)。The formation and instruction of ability groups。American Journal of Education,97(1),34-64。  new window
21.Francis, B.、Archer, L.、Hodgen, J.、Pepper, D.、Taylor, B.、Travers, M. C.(2017)。Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ability grouping in England: A discourse analytic account。Cambridge Journal of Education,47(1),1-17。  new window
22.Gamoran, A.(1986)。Instructional and institutional effect of ability grouping。Sociology of Education,59(4),185-198。  new window
23.Gamoran, A.、Mare, R. D.(1989)。Secondary school tracking and education inequality: Compensation reinforcement, or neutrality?。American Journal of Sociology,94(5),1146-1183。  new window
24.Van Houtte, M.、Demanet, J.、Stevens, P. A. J.(2012)。Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference?。Acta Sociologica,55(1),73-89。  new window
25.Nomi, T.(2010)。The effects of within-class ability grouping on academic achievement in early elementary years。Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,3(1),56-92。  new window
26.Rees, D. I.、Brewer, D. J.、Argys, L. M.(2000)。How should we measure the effect of ability grouping on student performance?。Economics of Education Review,19(1),17-20。  new window
27.Slavin, R. E.(1990)。Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis。Review of Education Research,60(3),471-499。  new window
28.Zeidner, M.、Schleyer, E.(1999)。The effect of educational context on individual difference variables, self-perceptions of giftedness, and school attitudes in gifted adolescents。Journal of Youth and Adolescence,28(6),687-702。  new window
29.陳怡靖、鄭燿男(20000700)。臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷--檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在臺灣的適用性。國家科學委員會研究彙刊.人文及社會科學,10(3),416-434。  延伸查詢new window
30.張春興(19850600)。國中編班教學問題之調查研究(2):國中生對現行編班教學方式的看法。教育心理學報,18,17-37。  延伸查詢new window
31.陳寬政、王德睦、陳文玲(19860600)。臺灣地區人口變遷的原因與結果。人口學刊,9,1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.陳奕奇、劉子銘(20081200)。教育成就與城鄉差距:空間群聚之分析。人口學刊,37,1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王麗雲、游錦雲(2008)。高中環境對學生學習影響之評估:以臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫進行檢證。「臺灣高中教育政策檢討與展望」研討會,國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心(主辦) 。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Gamoran, A.(2009)。Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice。Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research。  new window
學位論文
1.王儷蓉(2006)。編班方式對於國中生學習成就的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳博政(1982)。國中能力分班、教師期望與教師教學態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張春興(1987)。希望的追尋與挫折。台北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
2.Oakes, Jeannie(1985)。Keeping track: How schools structure inequality。Yale University Press。  new window
其他
1.人本教育基金會(2002)。2002年國中違反常態編班狀況調査報告,http://hef.yam.org.tw/research/08/08-03.doc。  延伸查詢new window
2.人本教育基金會(2003)。2003年各縣市升學編班狀況調查報告(臺中縣市除外),http://hre.pro.edu.tw/UserFiles/s4(1).doc。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃光國(2003)。教改萬言書:終結教改亂象,追求優質教育,http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~iaezcpc/c-edu%20reform.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.張善楠、黃毅志(1999)。臺灣原漢族群、社區與家庭對學童教育的影響。臺灣原住民教育。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Gamoran, A.(2010)。Tracking and inequality: New directions for research and practice。The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education。London:Routledge。  new window
3.Good, T.、Marshall, S.(1984)。Do students learn more in heterogeneous or homogeneous group?。The social context of instruction。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
4.Hallian, M. T.、Ellison, B. J.(2006)。The practice of ability grouping。School sector and student outcomes。Notre Dame, IN:University of Notre Dame Press。  new window
5.Kulik, J. A.(2004)。Grouping, tracking, and de-tracking: Conclusions from experimental, correlational, and ethnographic research。Can unlike students learn together?。Greenwich, CT:Information Age。  new window
6.Bourdieu, P.(1986)。The forms of capital。Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE