本研究為中文版流暢狀態量表(Flow State Scale簡稱FSS)初步研究結果呈 現，目的在於檢驗Jackson & Marsh(]996)的運動流暢狀態量表修訂為中文版的建構 效度與內部一致性信度。本研究以國內大專甲乙組11個運動項目(男227名，女137 名)，共計364名學生為受試對象。本研究進行探索性因素分析後發現Jackson & Marsn(1996)研究中原有的九個流暢向度中挑戰與技巧平衡、動作與知覺合一、清 晰的目標、立即的回饋、控制感與不費力的專汪六向度融合為同一向度，重新命 名為「專注與回饋」向度;但原量表之自成性經驗、喪失自我的意識及時間感的 改變三向度不變。本研究亦發現修訂後之流暢狀態量表四個向度內部一致性介 於.64到.95之間。研究結論指出語意、文化上差異可能是中文版流暢狀量表與原 量表不一致的原因。本研究建議後續研究者可以質化研究探索國內選手在流暢經 驗上的感受或者以驗證性因素分析進一步驗證本量表的因素結構。

　　　　　The purpose of this study was to explore the validity and reliability of Flow StateScale(FSS)of Chinese version.With double translation procedure, this study adrninisteredJackson& Marsh(1996)FSS to364 intercollegiate student athletes(M=227, F=137,mean age= 20.87±3.73). Factor analysis revealed the Chinese version of FSS hadonly four factors named as ,concentration and feedback, loss of self-consciousness,autotelic experience and distortion oftime. The original factors C-S balance, cleargoal, action-awareness merging .unambiguousfeedback, concentration task at hand and sense of control were meraged into a new factornamed "concentration and feedback". Cronbach a coefficients revealed that all four factorswere internally consistent. This study suggested that further research may adopt qualitativeapproach to explore flowexperience with Chinese athletes. Also, the researchers interested inpresent study mayadopt confirmatory factor analysis and multiple sample multiple-traitapproach to validated theflow experience with Chinese athletes.