:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國稅務會計人員執行兩稅合一績效之影響因素
書刊名:中山管理評論
作者:許崇源 引用關係蔡英地
作者(外文):Hsu, Chung-yuanCai, Ying-di
出版日期:2002
卷期:10:2
頁次:頁231-259
主題關鍵詞:兩稅合一績效知識經驗能力Integrated income tax systemPerformanceKnowledgeExperienceAbility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:39
本研究連用Libby(1995)之續效模型,探討我國稅務會計人員執行兩稅合一續效之影響因素,根據Libby(I995)之續效模型,續效決定於知識及能力,而知識則受經驗與能力之影響。本文以「年度結算申報」、「未分配盈餘加徵10%計算與申報」、「兩稅合一租稅規劃」三工作勝任能力來衡量會計人員執行兩稅合一之績效,知識則依「新」、「舊」分為兩稅合一知識與一般營利事業所得稅知識,並以「教育程度」衡量一般解決問題能力;以「職業屬性」、「年資」、「在學教育」衡量經驗。 研究結果發現,影響「一般營利事業所得稅知識」高低之因素包含職業屬性、年資,而不受一般解決問題能力、在學教育(主修科系)所影響;影響「兩稅合一知識」高低之因素則為職業屬性、一般解決問題能力及「一般營利事業所得稅知識」,而不受年資及在學教育(主修科系)所影響。知識越高者,執行與該知識相關之工作續效越好,故「一般營利事業所得稅知識」高低與執行「期未結算申報」續效呈正相關;「兩稅合一知識」與「未分配盈餘加徵10%的計算與 申報」續效呈正相關;「一般營利事業所得稅知識」、「兩稅合一知識」亦與「租 稅規劃」相關。一般解決問題能力與執行兩稅合一相關工作續效,則無顯著關係。 本研究亦發現受試者普遍認為兩稅合一後相關工作較兩稅合一前困難,但除了中小企業之稅務會計人員外;其他屬性(會計師業、記帳業及大企業)之稅務會計人員則大都認為自己「能勝任」兩稅合一後相關工作。受試者亦認為外部教育機構所開立之兩稅合一進修班或研討會對其在兩稅合一知識的吸收上,幫助最大。此外,我們發現雖然記帳業者之知識測試成績較會計師低,但其自我績效評估則較會計師為優,值得供未來研究參考。
This study employs Libby's Antecedent and Consequence of Knowledge Model (1996) to investigate the determinants of performance on implementing the new tax System - the integrated income tax system. According to Libby's model, performance is a function of knowledge and ability, and experience and ability are the antecedent of knowledge. Performance measured is focused on three types of task, the filing of tax return, the computation of undistributed earnings for 10% extra enterprise income tax, and tax planning under the integrated income tax system. Knowledge is defined as “specific knowledge in the integrated income tax regulations” and “generalenterprise income tax knowledge”. General problem-solving ability is measured by education level, and experience is caught by the subject’s career attribute, career duration and school instruction. The survey results show that the career attribute and career duration have impact on the general enterprise income tax knowledge. Career attribute, general problem­solving ability and general income tax knowledge determine the specific knowledge in the integrated income tax regulations. The results also support that those who possess more knowledge perform better while they are doing their jobs, which related to what they had learnt before. So, those with sufficient "General income tax knowledge" performs better in “the fiIing of tax return” and those with sufficient "knowledge in the integrated income tax regulations" also performs well in “thecomputation of 10% extra income tax on undistributed earnings.” Meanwhile, “General income tax knowledge” and “specific knowledge in the integrated income tax regulations” are related to the performance of “tax planning”. In addition, we also find that the bookkeeping agents grade themselves more optimistic than the CPA does, although the knowledge score of the bookkeeping agent is lower than CPA's score.
期刊論文
1.Bonner, Sarah E.、Walker, Paul L.(1994)。The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge。The Accounting Review,69(1),157-178。  new window
2.Birnberg, J. G.、Shields, M. D.、Young, S. M.(1990)。The case for multiple methods in empirical management accounting research (with an illustration from budget setting)。Journal of Management Accounting Research,2(1),33-66。  new window
3.Bonner, S. E.、Pennington, N.(1991)。Cognitive process and knowledge as determinants of auditor expertise。Journal of Accounting Literature,10(1),1-50。  new window
4.Anderson, J. R.(1982)。Acquisition of cognitive skill。Psychological Review,89(4),369-406。  new window
5.Ashton, R. H.、Brown, P. R.(1980)。Descriptive Modeling of Auditors' Internal Control Judgments: Replication and Extension。Journal of Accounting Research,18(1),269-277。  new window
6.Bonner, S. E.(1990)。Experience Effects in Auditing: The Role of Task-Specific Knowledge。The Accounting Review,65(1),72-92。  new window
7.Bonner, S. E.、Lewis, B. L.(1990)。Determinants of auditor expertise。Journal of Accounting Research,28(3),1-28。  new window
8.Frederick, D.(1991)。Auditors' Representation and Retrieval of Internal Control Knowledge。The Accounting Review,66(2),240-258。  new window
9.Hamilton, R. E.、Wright, W. F.(1982)。Internal control judgments and effects of experience: Replications and extensions。Journal of Accounting Research,20(2),756-765。  new window
10.許崇源(20000300)。兩稅合一制對我國營利事業所得稅會計處理及投資人財務報表使用之影響。會計研究月刊,172,49-59。  延伸查詢new window
11.杜榮瑞(19980300)。知識、誘因與會計決策--除誤途徑。管理學報,15(1),27-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Libby, R.、Luft, J. L.(199307)。Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment。Accounting, Organizations and Society,18(5),425-450。  new window
13.戚務君、俞洪昭、許崇源、曹美娟(20010700)。兩稅合一制度下股東可扣抵稅額揭露之價值攸關性。會計評論,33,77-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.許崇源、俞洪昭、洪盈斌、戚務君(20000400)。兩稅合一制度對公司屬性與股票報酬關聯性之影響。會計評論,32,81-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.杜榮瑞(19980600)。行為會計研究之回顧:問題與典範。中山管理評論,6(2),293-330。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Abdolmohammadi, M. J.、Wright, A.(198701)。An Examination of the Effects of Experience and Task Complexity on Audit Judgments。The Accounting Review,62(1),1-13。  new window
17.Ashton, R. H.(1974)。An experimental study of internal control judgments。Journal of Accounting Research,12(1),143-157。  new window
18.Ashton, R. H.(1976)。Cognitive changes induced by accounting changes: experimental evidence on the functional fixation hypothesis。Journal of Accounting Research,14(Supplement),1-17。  new window
19.Frederick, D. M.、Libby, R.(1986)。Expertise and auditors' judgments of conjunctive events。Journal of Accounting Research,24(2),270-290。  new window
20.Anderson, J.(1987)。Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-method Problem Solution。Psychological Review,94(2),192-210。  new window
21.林世銘、蔡松棋、巫鑫(1996)。實施兩稅合一教戰守策。實用稅務,264,14-26。  延伸查詢new window
22.Davis, J. S.、Bonner, S. E.、Jackson, B. R.(1992)。Expertise in corporate tax planning: The issue identification stage。Journal of Accounting Research,30(Supplement),1-28。  new window
23.Tan, Hun-Tong、Libby, R.(1994)。Modeling the determinants of audit expertise。Accounting, Organizations and Society,19(8),701-716。  new window
24.Shields, M. D.(1995)。An empirical analysis of firms' implementation experiences with activity-based costing。Journal of Management Accounting Research,7,148-166。  new window
會議論文
1.陳聽安、蘇建榮(1997)。兩稅合一制度及其效果之分析。沒有紀錄。13-54。  延伸查詢new window
2.戚務君、俞洪昭、許崇源(2000)。The nature of corporate Income tax under full imputation tax regime: A test of the functional fixation。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
學位論文
1.蘇導民(1986)。我國採行兩稅合一之一般均衡分析(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭豊鈴(1989)。公司組織未分配盈餘課稅之探討,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.單騰笙(1997)。兩稅合一制在內生化成長模型中之探討,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊秀雄(1996)。政府租稅政策對公司資本結構暨資金成本影響之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.林宜龍(1999)。兩稅合一制對我國集團企業股利政策之衝擊,0。  延伸查詢new window
6.馬孝璿(1999)。兩稅合一對上市上櫃公司股利政策影響之探討,0。  延伸查詢new window
7.許白蘭(1999)。我國兩稅合一制度對多國籍企業之影響-對外投資事業之實證研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Neter, John、Wasserman, William、Kutner, Michael H.(1990)。Applied Linear Statistical Models。Richard D. Irwin, Inc.。  new window
2.陳英豪、吳裕益(1990)。測驗與評量。高雄:復文書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院賦稅改革委員會(1970)。專題研究彙編(一)。專題研究彙編(一)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院經濟建設委員會(2001)。全國經濟發展會議預備會議初步結論報告。全國經濟發展會議預備會議初步結論報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1998)。兩稅合一所得稅法疑議解答(修正版)。兩稅合一所得稅法疑議解答(修正版)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.簡茂發、郭生玉(1985)。測驗的編製。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Libby, R.(1995)。The Role of Knowledge and Memory in Audit Judgment。Judgment and Decision Making Research in Accounting and Auditing。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE