:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運動自我設限量表之探索性驗證性因素分析
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:吳佳煇王澤惠林以正
作者(外文):Wu, Chia-hueiWang, Che-huiLin, Yi-cheng
出版日期:2004
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁139-148
主題關鍵詞:運動自我設限辯解降低努力探索性因素分析驗證性因素分析Self handicap scale for sportsExploratory factor analysisConfirmatory factor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:48
本研究主要目的在於利用不同的研究樣本,進行探索性與驗證性的因素分析,來被視「運動自我設限量表」的因素結構。本研究參與者為581位台灣大學學生,參與者在隨機分派為兩個研究樣本後,分別用以進行探索性因素分析與驗證性因素分析。探索性因素分析的結果顯示,本量表具有「辯解」與「努力」等兩個自我設限的潛在因素,而驗證性因素分析則確立了二因素結構為較佳的模式,並且篩選出七題較為理想的測量題目。在未來研究中,研究者將可視議題需要利用此量表中的兩個次量表進行運動員自我設限的相關研究,籍以了解不同自我設限相關的心理與行為歷程與處置策略。
The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of the "Self Handicap Scale for Sports" by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with different samples. There were 581 students at National Taiwan University who participated in this study. The participants were first randomly assigned into two independent samples. The exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were then conducted respectively with these two samples. The result of exploratory factor analysis revealed that there were two factors underlying this scale, including "making excuse" and "reducing effort". Moreover, the results of confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-factor structure model and retained seven items. In the future, researchers were suggested to use these two subscales, i.e., "making excuse" and "reducing effort", to study relevant issues of self-handicapping, and to develop effective coping strategies.
期刊論文
1.Carron, A. V.、Prapavessis, H.、Grove, J. R.(1994)。Group effects and self-handicapping。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,16(3),246-257。  new window
2.Hausenblas, H. A.、Carron, A. V.(1996)。Group cohesion and self-handicapping in female and male athletes。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,18(2),132-143。  new window
3.Rhodewalt, F.、Saltzman, A. T.、Wittmer, J.(1984)。Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of practice in self-esteem protection。Basic and Applied Social Psychology,5(3),197-209。  new window
4.Strube, M. J.(1986)。An analysis of the self-handicapping scale。Basic and Applied Social Psychology,7(3),211-224。  new window
5.Berglas, Steven、Jones, Edward E.(1978)。Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36(4),405-417。  new window
6.Ryska, Todd A.、Yin, Zenong、Boyd, Michael(1999)。The Role of Dispositional Goal Orientation and Team Climate on Situational Self-Handicapping among Young Athletes。Journal of Sport Behavior,22(3),410-425。  new window
學位論文
1.陳偉瑀(2001)。競爭情境及回饋方式對高、低自我設限學生在運動練習行為、運動表現及歸因的影響(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rhodewalt, Frederick(1990)。Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory, self-protective acts。Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn't。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE