:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:文化、認同與國家安全
書刊名:遠景基金會季刊
作者:葉定國
作者(外文):Yeh, Ding-gwo
出版日期:2004
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁125-156
主題關鍵詞:國際關係安全研究文化認同International relationsSecurity studyCultureIdentity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:64
  • 點閱點閱:37
     冷戰結束後的複雜國際情勢,使得國際關係中安全的範圍和議題研究更為擴展,當前國際關係理論安全研究架構已無法滿足目前研究所需。在過去,文化及認同因素被認為是解釋國際現象的「最後選擇」,但目前它已經成為國際關係研究的重要課題,主流國際關係理論諸如新現實主義與新自由主義對這兩項議題也較以往更為關注。Latham認為在國際關係理論中,文化與認同等社會學面向因素的探討是一項「強勁的知識開展動作」。由此衍生的諸多觀點,如建構主義(constructivism)、反思主義(reflectivism)、後現代主義(postmodernism)、女性主義(feminism)等,它們在國際關係研究領域中也愈來愈受到重視。本文嘗試透過文化與認同因素的分析,重新檢視國際關係的安全研究,同時探究它們在安全研究領域中所產生的影響。
     This article argues the important influence of culture and identity in national security studies. In my viewpoint, I think culture and identity have become powerful elements in security studies. After Cold War, The material factor is not only the basic of national security, at the same time, the culture clash has become another potential factor that influence the national and international security. The 911 are the best example. In this article, I try to survey the international relations theory by culture and identity factors, and try to know the influence of culture and identity in security research of international relations. I have three points of conclusion: 1. Culture and identity have become important factors of national security. 2. The scholar of mainstream international theory (like neo-realism and neo-liberalism) have pay more attention to culture and identity research. 3. It is very important that combine the cultural and material factors of national security research. The effective culture strategy will improve the function of national security policy.
期刊論文
1.Lapid, Yoself(1989)。The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivism Era。International Studies Quarterly,33(1),235-254。  new window
2.Haftendorn, H.(199103)。The Security Puzzle:Theory-Building and Discipline-Building in International Security。International Studies Quarterly,35(1),3-18。  new window
3.袁鶴齡(20000700)。國家認同外部因素之初探--美國因素、中國因素與臺灣的國家認同。理論與政策,14(2)=54,141-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Rosen, Stephen Peter(1995)。Military Effectiveness: Why Society Matters。International Security,19(4),5-31。  new window
5.Newman, E.(2001)。Human Security and Constructivism。International Studies Perspectives,2(3),239-251。  new window
6.Farrell, Theo(2002)。Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program。International Studies Review,4(1),49-72。  new window
7.莫大華(19980800)。「安全研究」論戰之評析。問題與研究,37(8),19-33+86。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.莫大華(19960900)。「安全研究」之趨勢。問題與研究,35(9),61-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Alexander, J. C.、Smith, P.(1993)。The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies。Theory and Society,22,151-207。  new window
10.Heller, A.(2002)。911, or Modernity and Terror。Constellations,9(1),53-65。  new window
11.Latham, R.(0)。Moments of Transformation。Items,47,1-8。  new window
12.Linklater, A.(1994)。Dialogue, Dialectic and Emancipation in International Relations at the End of the Post-War Age。Millennium,23,119-131。  new window
13.Maclean, J.(1983)。Political Theory, International Theory and Problems of Ideology。Millennium: Journal of International Studies,10。  new window
14.McGuire, M.(2002)。Shifting the Paradigm。International Affairs,78(1),1-28。  new window
15.Raymond, G. A.(1997)。Problems and Prospects in the Study of International Norms。Mershon International Studies Review,41,205-246。  new window
16.Vayrynen, R.(0)。不連續世界中的集體暴力:區域性現實與全球性錯覺。國際社會科學雜誌,4(4)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.翁明賢(2001)。突圍:國家安全的新視野。臺北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Booth, K.、Smith, S.(1995)。International Relations Theory Today。New York, NY:Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
3.Der Derian, James(1995)。International Theory: Critical Investigations。New York, NY:New York University Press。  new window
4.Buzan, Barry Gordon、Wæver, Ole、De Wilde, Jaap(1998)。Security: a New Framework for Analysis。Lynne Rienner Publishers。  new window
5.Alagappa, Muthiah(1998)。Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences。Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press。  new window
6.Morgenthau, Hans Joachim(1972)。Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace。Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
7.Lapid, Yosef、Kratochwil, Friedrich V.(1996)。The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory。Boulder, Colo.:Lynne Rienner Press。  new window
8.Booth, Ken(1991)。New Thinking about Strategy and International Security。London:Harper Collins Academic。  new window
9.Said, Edward W.、王志弘、王淑燕、郭菀玲、莊雅仲、游美惠、游常山(1999)。東方主義。臺北:立緒文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.張勝軍、劉小林、Rosenau, James N.(2001)。沒有政府的治理。南昌:江西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.王逸舟(1999)。國際政治學--歷史與理論。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.Walker, Robert B. J.(1993)。Inside/ Outside: International Relations as Political Theory。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts:Little Brown。  new window
14.Wendt, Alexander、秦亞青(2000)。國際政治的社會理論。上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Katzenstein, Peter Joachim(1996)。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Rosenau, J. N.、Davids, V.、Maaurice, A.(1972)。The Analysis of International Politics。The Analysis of International Politics。New York, NY。  new window
17.Therborn, G.(1993)。The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology。The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology。London, UK。  new window
18.Fukuyama, F.、張美惠(2000)。歷史終結與最後一人。歷史終結與最後一人。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.施正鋒(2001)。美中臺三角關係--由新現實主義到建構主義。臺北:前衛出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Holsti, K. J.、李偉成、譚溯成(1996)。國際政治分析架構。國際政治分析架構。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
21.Youngs, G.、黃競涓(2000)。全球時代的國際關係。全球時代的國際關係。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
22.Comarroff, J. L.、Stern, P. C.(1995)。New Perspectives on Nationalism and War。New Perspectives on Nationalism and War。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
23.Faure, G. O.、Rubin, J. Z.(1993)。Culture and Negotiations。Culture and Negotiations。Newbury Park, CA。  new window
24.Fitzgerald, T. K.(1993)。Metaphors of Identity。Metaphors of Identity。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE