:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論梁啟超對老子思想的評析
書刊名:通識研究集刊
作者:黃淑基
作者(外文):Huang, Sue-chi
出版日期:2005
卷期:7
頁次:頁83-97
主題關鍵詞:梁啟超老子時代意義先秦道家Liang Chi-chauLau-tzeMeaning of the timeEarly period of Chin dynastyTaoist
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
梁先生對老子哲學的評論與解析,或許以哲學研究者的角度來看,其論不深,且並未完全忠於老子學說的原意。對於現代學者欲更深入了解老子的哲理,可能沒有太多實質上的幫助。不過,若我們回歸梁先生當時寫作的時代背景來看,梁先生運用了在當時非常新進的西方學術的分析手法來處理老子哲學中的問題。而且他的論述理論都與當時的社會背景與時代潮流密切吻合,這是非常不容易的。梁先生之解老子哲學,不是給學者專家看的,而是站在推廣中國文明意識的立場上,將老子哲學推廣給一般大眾能予以實用、實踐的。此一特殊的解老手法,或許也只有身為革命家的梁先生有勇氣為之。
About Mr. Liang Chi-Chau’s critics and analysis of the Lau-Tze’s philophy, in philosophical researchers’ point of view, we might think that he didn’t do an effective work and was not in accordance with the original thoughts of Lau-Tze’s Theory. His discourse may not have much essential help for modern scholars deeply understanding the Lau-Tze’s philosophy. But, if we go back to the hereat time when Mr. Liang was writing about it, we could find out that Mr. Liang used the grand new analysis with western academics to solve the questions in the Lau-Tze’s philosophy. Also, his discourse and theory closely matched with the social background the climate of the period. It is very difficult to do this. What Mr. Liang solved Lau-Tze’s Philosophy is not be viewed by scholars but is promoted for the general use on the situation that stands on generalizing conscious of Chinese civilization. It may only be the revolutionist, Mr. Liang Chi-Chau, has the courage doing this special solution of analyzing Lau-Tze’s philosophy.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE