:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論認識的「意向」--知識傳遞可能之探討
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:李政達
作者(外文):Lee, Vence Jen Ta
出版日期:2006
卷期:33:5=384
頁次:頁101-118
主題關鍵詞:意向認識抽向概念知識語言實在論IntentionCognitionAbstractConceptKnowledgeLanguageRealism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:45
人類知識的傳遞依賴言語,言語仍一意義系統的組合與運用,而言語系統的基本元素依傳統哲學語言,即是概念。概念乃作為知識傳遞之語言的內涵,然概念在士林哲學的理論中卻必然為普遍的。本文為了堅守士林哲學實在論的脈胳來探討知識傳遞的可能,故在討論順序上由「普遍概念」的說明開始。而由於普遍概念是透過理性抽象所得,因此在說明了普遍概念之後進而說明「士林哲學的抽象」。進一步由於多瑪斯(Aquinas, Thomas, 1224/5-1274)主張普遍概念乃是普遍意向,本文接著將討論引至「意向於認識的功能」問題之上。續之藉?意向的特性指出「普遍概念的存在方式」。在解釋了上述問題之後,再將問題導回言語於士林哲學的脈胳裡如何達致「知識傳遞的可能」。最後於文末以簡短的「小結」作為本文的結論。
The communication of knowledge relies on language. While language is the combinations and applications of a particular system of meanings, and the essential elements of language system are, as traditional philosophy calls, concept. Determined to explore the possibility of communicating knowledge in the context of scholastic realism, this article first explains “universal concept.” Since universal concepts are the results of rational abstraction, after the explanation of universal concept, we are about to illustrate the “abstractness of scholasticism.” Moreover, due to the fact that Thomas Aquinas claimed that universal concept was universal intentional, this article will discuss the “functions of intention for cognition.” Then we will point out, via the features of intention, “the ways of universal concept to exist.” After explaining the forementioned questions, the issue at stake will be re-directed back to how language achieves the “possibility of communicating knowledge” in the context of scholasticism. At last, this article is finalized with “the conclusion.”
期刊論文
1.李政達(20040700)。士林哲學感性認識論。哲學與文化,31(7)=362,19-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李政達(20050700)。士林哲學的時空觀--以亞里斯多德哲學為例。哲學論集,38,87-113+274-276。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李政達(200507)。論分量於知識之實在意義。International Journal of Philosophy,39-56。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃美貞(1974)。聖多瑪斯認識行為本體論闡微(博士論文)。輔仁大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Van Steenberghen, Fernand(1989)。Philosophie fondamentale。Montréal:Québec:Edition du Preambule。  new window
2.Thoma, Aquinas Saint、Rowan, John P.(1974)。In Metaphysics (Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle)。先知出版社。  new window
3.Van Riet, Georges(1960)。Problemes d'épistémologie。Louvain:Paris。  new window
4.Phillips, R. P.(1954)。Modern Thomistic Philosophy。Westminster, Maryland:The Newman Press。  new window
5.Lalande, A.(1951)。Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie。Paris:Presses Universitaire de France。  new window
6.Copleston, Frederick。A History of Philosophy。  new window
7.Grenet, P. B.(1962)。Les 24 theses Thomistes (De l'evolution a l'existence)。Paris:P. Tequi。  new window
8.Glare, P. G. W.(1997)。Oxford Latin Dictionary。Oxford:The Clarendon Press。  new window
9.Thomas, Aquinas Saint、Fathers of English Dominican Province(1948)。Summa Theologica。NY:Benziger Brothers, Inc.。  new window
10.Hume, David、Selby-Bigge, L. A.(1988)。A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-1740)。Oxford:Cambridge University Press:Clarendon Press。  new window
11.Lonergan, Bernard(1958)。Insight: A Study of Human Understanding。New York:London:Philosophical Library Inc:Longman & Todd。  new window
12.關永中(2000)。知識論(一)--古典思潮。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Gadamer, Hans-Georg(1975)。Truth and Method。New York:The Continuum Publishing Corporation。  new window
14.王臣瑞(2000)。知識論。臺北:台灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.Aristotle、Barnes, Jonathan(1984)。The Complete Work of Aristotle。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brentano, F.(1967)。The Distinction between Mental and Physical。Realism and the Background of Phenomenology。NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE